Fight2FlyPhoto wrote:
I'm glad you have brought up this "other side of the coin" to ponder. It's easy to get caught up in the splendor of these machines and think that everyone just has to love them. But the reality is they represent some very horrible decisions people were forced to make, such as taking the lives of other men and women. And the horror of being shot at yourself, and losing friends. I believe it is just as important to hear the stories of those who do not like our preservation of them as those who praise it. I also think it is important to share their opinions as much as those who are pleased by these restorations.
I believe the business of restoring and preserving these machines is two-fold. On one hand you're preserving a specific story from a military perspective, but you're also telling a story of innovation and technology. After walking through an entire hangar worth of warbirds going through their annual inspections, it is absolutely astonishing what advances in technology took place during such a short period of time. You're also telling the story of the designers, engineers, assemblers, etc. not "just" the men on the front lines.
I agree - and that's part of the reason to keep these airplanes around, and preserved, and displayed both in the air or on the ground; because it's important that we never forget what happened in our past. It's important that we remember it, and it's important that those people and stories who are our past, both good and bad, happy and sad, heroic and tragic, be remembered. The B-25 that limped home with a dead tail gunner cut in half by cannon fire - that's a horrible memory for anyone who was part of that story to have to remember, and I can completely understand their desire to want to forget it, but at the same time I think it's very, very wrong for us to allow that story and that sacrifice to be forgotten. It's a complex issue, and you have to respect everyone's opinion on it because just about everyone is coming at it from their own unique perspective.