warbird2 wrote:
Yanks museum is far from being in financial trouble. Most of their planes are fully restored and flyable, they just are not flown. Pima can not fly most of their airplanes no matter who pays for what because a lot of them belong to the air force.
Most of evergreens collection is flyable as well, they are far from financial trouble, but they do have some planes on loan from the military.
So private air museum's such as Pima, McMinnville, Yanks, etc. have several very nice warbirds that are static only and I would assume are feeling the pinch of the poor economy. I wonder if these museums have or would be willing to part with a few of their aircraft to private owners such as Paul Allen, Rod Lewis etc. who seem to want to collect airworthy examples. OK OK after reading my above paragraph twenty seven times over I finally get how a couple of you are getting confused on the "financial trouble" deal. I'll say it once again, Sorry! for the confusion, I was NOT in anyway accusing ANY museum of being in financial trouble. OK last time I hope, I was NOT trying to state that any one particular museum was in ANY financial trouble. But I would bet they ALL, whether it be a museum, owner, club, boy scout troup, whatever, are feeling some sort of poor economic pinch as we all are, but that does not equate to me accusing them of being in financial trouble. That I can assure you of, If not, I'm going to buy the first museum I can find that's for sale. So please do me a great big favor and lose the "financial trouble" BS ... it doesn't exist in my questions. And also the debate about what should fly and what shouldn't doesn't exist here either. It was just mean't to be a few simple questions about what
privately owned museum aircraft would you like to acquire and make airworthy. Again sorry for the confusing questions but don't twist it so much. geezz!!!
