Wed Feb 23, 2011 12:40 pm
Wed Feb 23, 2011 12:51 pm
wendovertom wrote:Still irked that it has lost the T-Birds paint.![]()
Tom P.
Wed Feb 23, 2011 12:54 pm
Wed Feb 23, 2011 1:15 pm
mustangdriver wrote:Rick, can you tell us anything on the new scheme? Like will it an honor a specific squadron or veteran? Or is it a surprise?
Wed Feb 23, 2011 8:37 pm
Wed Feb 23, 2011 8:44 pm
Warbird Kid wrote:warbird1 wrote:Who says they're too dangerous? Where did that come from?
Poor choice of words on my part. I meant that the CF can't obtain an F-105 to fly due to government restrictions. Yet they've already obtained two vietnam era jets through congressional help and now have a third (Im assuming the sale for the F-100 was facilitated completely in the private sector since this was already a privately owned flyable warbird).
Im going to also assume that the TA-4, F-4, and F-100 are just as deadly as the F-105 (Strictly speaking in a combat scenario). Looking at it from the government's point of view: They see this organization (The Collings Foundation) operating WW II and Vietnam era aircraft in a safe and professional manner with a very long respectable track record. Since this organization is expanding there Vietnam collection and have already proved of being capable of operating 2 high profile former combat jets, and now just obtained a third, what would the holdup be to acquire an 105? Is there something Im missing that makes the Thunderchief more of a hazard to the government than what's already out there?
Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:34 pm
cco23i wrote:Here's what they should paint it as:
These are when the 20th was in Libya
Plus guys, I'm sorry after 27 years of crewing I can't stand the thunderbirds.
Scott
Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:46 pm
Wed Feb 23, 2011 9:50 pm
Wed Feb 23, 2011 10:04 pm
cco23i wrote:If I remember these are from a 1968 deployment.
Scott
Wed Feb 23, 2011 10:08 pm
mustangdriver wrote:The Collings Foundation is very good about honoring many people with their aircraft. They even change up some of the schemes from time to time. I think everyone has presented great schemes, and I like the one that they are doing too. So down the road maybe they will do the same with this one. For right now I am just happy this one is not on a pole! I am thankful to the past owner for maintaining this aircraft, and to the CF for picking up the legacy from here.
Wed Feb 23, 2011 10:53 pm
Wed Feb 23, 2011 11:15 pm
cco23i wrote:Here's one from 66 so I am not sure about whaen they got rid of the buzz numbers.
Scott
Thu Feb 24, 2011 12:17 pm
Thu Feb 24, 2011 5:08 pm