Mon Nov 29, 2010 9:36 pm
Tue Nov 30, 2010 8:34 am
Tue Nov 30, 2010 3:10 pm
Tue Nov 30, 2010 4:53 pm
P51Mstg wrote:I wouldn't use the term "airworthy" when refering to Kermit's P-63. Its in one piece and my Honda Accord is closer to flying than it is........
Mark H
Tue Nov 30, 2010 7:45 pm
Tue Nov 30, 2010 8:06 pm
L. Thompson wrote:Also, does anyone have a photo of the composite 43-11117/etc. when it was displayed at Malstrom AFB, Montana 1989-92? I don't recall ever seeing a published photo of it in Montana.
Malmstrom AFB wrote:Mr. Johansen,
Where did you get your information on 43-11117? Infact, we did have 43-11117 here but it was returned to the Air Force Museum at Dayton , Ohio , in 1999. Actually what we had was the remains of two crashed P-63s one of which was supposed to be 43-11117.
Be wary of displayed aircraft serial numbers in museums and air parks. Many have tail numbers that relate to an aircraft that may have been stationed at that location or flown by someone from that area. The Museum regulations allow that as long as the proper A/C serial number is displayed in small digits under the elevator pivot area and signage reflects that actual tail number.
I checked http://home.att.net/~jbaugher/1943_2.html and found the following:
43-10933/11132
Bell RP-63C-2-BE Kingcobra "flying target" version 11117 noted 1997 on display at Fantasy of
Flight
Museum ,
Polk City ,
FL as N91448
So, this is interesting since I didn’t send 43-11117 back to Dayton until 1999, and this was noted in 1997. You may want to contact the other museums direct to see if their display tail number is the correct one.
Malmstrom AFB wrote:Mr. Johansen,
Thank you for the information. I’ll attach it to the record file I have on 43-11117. I believe you are correct that what we had was from the photo you sent. I have included a photo of the rudder we had prior to shipment to Dayton.
Most military aircraft on display belong to the USAF Museum and are on loan to the various organizations and museums. What we are calling 43-11117 was nothing more than a pile of aluminum pieces all lumped in one spot. The supporting organization for our Museum had planned to restore the aircraft but did not have the funds or manpower required so the pile of parts (visible behind the rudder) sat for around 10 and started to collect other refuse. In 1999, the USAF Museum was looking for parts for another museum to complete a P-39/63 restoration. I had the parts, the Wing Commander wanted the pile gone, and back to Dayton they went. Did not think it was fair to retain the parts based on “someday” being able to restore it. I have asked Dayton , now they are called the National Museum of the Air Force, where 43-11117 is now. When I get a response I’ll forward it on to you.