Interesting the article glosses why the Aussies might want some - they were, after all secondhand Royal Australian Navy machines.
They're old, tired thirdhand bombers (strike/attack if you like), not fighters.
Quote:
It must be nice for a country to decide it can forgo an attack element to its air force.
Why spend your money when your friends will save your bacon if bad guys come knocking?
NZ is not 'a n other' country, but in a unique geo-political situation. Friends and bad guys aren't even on the horizon (literally, if you look at a map). If you look at air defence capability needs as against big dick posturing in the "I've got an air force" game, New Zealand has and has had no need for such a force. Since 2001 the New Zealanders have had a good deal of cash go to more useful things - hospitals, say - than keeping a very few of un-needed fighter jocks happy with toys.
An attack by Australia or the US on NZ as well as unthinkable wouldn't be turned away by a bunch of 1960s ex-Navy bombers. Other airborne 'threats' to New Zealand don't exist.
Future threats to NZ? Ummmm....
Of course such views are unthinkable for many.