Sat Mar 06, 2010 11:58 pm
Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:16 am
Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:31 am
bipe215 wrote:Having conversations in open cockpit airplanes....with no intercom.
Steve G
Sun Mar 07, 2010 1:24 am
Randy Haskin wrote:CAPFlyer wrote:Which of "the avionics" did they get right? It all seemed cheese to me. I've never done photo recce with a pod before, but I've been involved with plenty of ISR in a McDonnell Douglas aircraft that shares a lot of avionics with the Hornet, and nothing I've used looks anything like that.
Sun Mar 07, 2010 2:26 am
The prop engine sounds for the jet airliner in "Airplane". Oh wait, that may have been on purpose.
Sun Mar 07, 2010 6:14 am
Ethan wrote:Is there any aviation movie that doesnt have something wrong with it ?
Sun Mar 07, 2010 6:19 am
CAPFlyer wrote:I don't know about the specific screens they used for the "recce" pages, but the front end pages were recreated directly from the NATOPS manual for the F/A-18E and various pictures of the real thing by the Project Magenta crew - http://www.schiratti.com/bel/index.html
Sun Mar 07, 2010 7:18 am
Sun Mar 07, 2010 7:48 am
Garth wrote:The protagonist takes off from Eglin in an F-15C. Flies over the US in an F-15E. Then lands at Nellis in an F-15C, but one with a different s/n than the one he left in.
Sun Mar 07, 2010 8:22 am
Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:21 am
oscardeuce wrote:Mr Solo, a parsec is a unit of length, not time.
Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:48 am
Randy Haskin wrote:oscardeuce wrote:Mr Solo, a parsec is a unit of length, not time.
Well, as the discussion goes, being able to do the Kessel Run in a particular number of Parsecs is a display of prowess in jumping to lightspeed. Ergo, being able to do it in less segments of length (via jumps) than the other competitors.
Sun Mar 07, 2010 1:27 pm
Sun Mar 07, 2010 1:56 pm
Sun Mar 07, 2010 2:21 pm