Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Jun 26, 2025 3:18 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 8:01 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4969
Location: PA
A pretty interesting topic here I think that tends to bring up some good detail and discussion. "What if" Pearl Harbor: had the sinking of a Japanese midget sub from the USS Ward and PBY had been given directly to high command faster? If the Japanese aircraft that had been picked up on radar was not mistaken for the incoming B-17 flight from California? Or Washington was able to send out a message of the Japanese impending war to Kimmel and Short?

Regarding the airforce on Oahu...many of these pilots where high timed pilots with lots of experiance flying the P-36 and P-40. Not all aircraft would have been ready but I would think at lest a good portion of them would have been able to get ready and in the air to meet the Japanese. The rest could have been dispersed around the airfields rather then the sitting ducks being lined up close together. Those few that did get airborne gave a good account. But one has to take into account the Japanese arrived over Oahu with no air opposition so that caused lax I think in fighter protection helping the success in our few pilots in combat. It is hard to ponder what if when you factor in several things. At lest fewer of our fighters would have been destroyed on the ground.

Also perhaps PBY in joint with USAAC B-18's, O-47's, etc would have been sent out to look for the Japanese fleet.

:?:

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 8:42 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:52 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Hudson, MA
You are asking a lot to expect the Navy and Air Corps to begin joint operations within a few days prior of PH based on orders from Washington. Then there is the disparity in aircraft ranges and crew training. The PBY crews could tell the difference between types of ships but I doubt any of the Air Corps types could have.

As for warnings getting out earlier and faster preparation by the US forces think about this, double Japanese losses and halve American ones and what do you get? 60 Japanese aircraft lost and 1 American BB total loss and 2 BBs sunk and salvaged later, 1500 personnel lost and what only 150 planes destroyed. Still a pretty lopsided Japanese victory. Then there are the intangibles maybe Nevada gets outside the harbor only to be torpedoed in deep water for a total loss. Maybe the Japanese, realizing they have not had as great a surprise as they wanted decide to make up for that by continuing to attack and a third wave avoids the thoroughly alerted vessels in order to attack the fixed installations like dry docks, shops, and the tank farm. Maybe a recon aircraft supporting additional attacks finds the Enterprise and the Japanese regroup to attack her with the several hundred aircraft they still have.

Even if all of that happens to the US the long range outcome is much the same except the Japanese get another 6 to 12 months before the A bomb ends the war.

_________________
"I can't understand it, I cut it twice and it's still too short!" Robert F. Dupre' 1923-2010 Go With God.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 10:12 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 2716
Location: St Petersburg FL, USA
I seem to recall one of the War Colleges did a similar scenario. The outcome for the US Navy was something like 2-3 times the losses with just a slight increase in IJN losses. They had the US fleet sail out to meet the incoming fleet without the cover of the US Carriers. NOT a good outcome. I will dig and see if I can find the specifics on that study

_________________
Image
Aviation Illustration Website
http://shepartstudio.com/illustration/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:23 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Read Gordon W. Pranges book 'At dawn we slept' It covers a lot of the 'howcomes?' and 'whatifs' surrounding the run up to the IJN attack on Pearl Harbor, it seems that Roosevelt saw getting involved in the war as the quickest way to get America to shake off the lingering problems of the depression so things just sort of.....................happened.

In 1932 a wargame exercise was run by the Navy and came to the same conclusion that came about during the actual attack ,we were snoozing and got our butts handed to us in the attack. only I think the conclusions of the 1932 exercise came out quite a bit worse for US forces.

It's a facinating historical reference point.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 29, 2009 11:53 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:11 pm
Posts: 1559
Location: Damascus, MD
You can pretty much "what if" the entire Pacific War. At Midway, what if Bombing 8 actually found the Hiryu in the morning strike? Yorktown would have never been attacked, and probably would have been back in time for the October/November Guadalcanal battles as she was going to go stateside for an overhaul after Midway. It's possible that Yorktown could have shared the same level of reverence that the "Big E" did had it survived Midway and the rest of the war.

Or, another Midway one...if the production schedule for the TBF was about a month forward, the torpedo squadrons would have gone in with the TBF instead of the TBD. I think losses would have still been very heavy, but not nearly as catastrophic.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 12:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 10:28 pm
Posts: 788
Location: Washington State
As far as sending the B-17s after the Japanese fleet...Range, defenses and their own inexperience would have made a positive outcome unlikely.
-I can't see a good outcome with sending bombers out in a vague direction to find a fleet. Could they find them? Would thay have enough fuel to make it back to Hickam?
-Even if they did find the IJN ships, they would have been greatly outnumbered by Zekes. The majority of the B-17s were Ds (IIRC) with not the greatest defensive armament (as the RAF learned), it would not have been pretty for the 7th BG guys.
-And could they have even hit the moving ships which were throwing up defensive fire while dodging fighters?

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 6:12 am
Posts: 71
Location: Australia
Its funny. My wife gave me for christmas a map of the world jigsaw puzzle ( I still havent worked out why).

On Christmas day I studied that map and did my own what ifs and imagined how the Japanese ever thought they could hang onto the vastness of their front. Just from a logistics point of view it was doomed.

I also compared that to what the Germans were trying to achieve. Eventually I came up with a similar opinion albiet not on Logistic but cultural grounds.

Not meaning to start a food fight. Now go and check out the map of the Middle East. We are in trouble there. I wish there was another way to solve this problem. :cry:

_________________
aaaaaaaa


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 7:31 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:51 pm
Posts: 4669
Location: Cheshire, CT
And here I thought the thread was gonna be about the film "Pearl Harbor"! :lol:
"What IF" it was never made?!!! :lol:

We'd at least still have one more Tora Val flying!!!
Jerry

_________________
"Always remember that, when you enter the ocean or the forest, you are no longer at the top of the food chain."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:02 pm
Posts: 786
Location: US
the nips would have lost a few more planes, but the ending would have been the same as we were outnumbered. Remember they had a another strike ready to go if need be.


Last edited by jet1 on Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:02 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5748
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
Jerry O'Neill wrote:
And here I thought the thread was gonna be about the film "Pearl Harbor"! :lol:
"What IF" it was never made?!!! :lol:

We'd at least still have one more Tora Val flying!!!
Jerry

A good one Jerry!

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 11:07 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 5748
Location: Waukegan,Illinois
There are alot of "what ifs". I have always thought about "what if" D Day had failed. Most probably Russian troops would have reached the shores of the English Channel or we would have been dropping nukes all over Hitler's Reich before that could happen.

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!


Last edited by Pat Carry on Wed Dec 30, 2009 2:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 2:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:46 pm
Posts: 29
Location: La Selva Beach,calif.USA
What if we had F-14's..........http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=785nchHwII4

sorry could not resist. :twisted:
pretty cool flying in that clip


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 2:15 pm 
Offline
Probationary Member

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 7:53 pm
Posts: 3803
Location: Aspen, CO
It does seem incredible to me that the Japanese had the gall or guts or whatever to launch the attack in the first place, achieved complete surprise, then got cold feet and did not send in the final attack to really finish Pearl off.

Of course we are looking in hindsight we all we know of how little oposition we put up and what more damage could have been done. Yamamoto did not have an airiel view of Oahu during the battle, he had to rely on fragmented reports of fighter and bomber pilots, and pulled back too soon. Maybe they needed a recon plane high overhead to radio back a code.

A bigger victory would have perhaps given them another year of superiority in the Pacific, but they still would not have won the war.

Had American B-17s gone out and even found the carriers, they would likely not be able to hit a turning ship and few would have survived the Zeros.

_________________
Bill Greenwood
Spitfire N308WK


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 2:32 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:26 pm
Posts: 4969
Location: PA
Our fighters could have strafed the decks of the Japanese carriers. Even just a few planes on the desk been destroyed would stop all operation from that carrier. Don't forget we also had Naval aircraft at Ewa. Pactically everything avialable would have been sent out.

It is a big question why they did not go for the third strike. I would estimate the Japanese would have lost double their aircraft had they made the third wave. But then again they would have been able to damage or destroy the oil tanks and dry docks. Something they failed to do in the first two attacks.

_________________
Shop the Airplane Bunker At
www.warbirdbunker.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 4:27 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 3:34 am
Posts: 1021
Holedigger wrote:
I seem to recall one of the War Colleges did a similar scenario. The outcome for the US Navy was something like 2-3 times the losses with just a slight increase in IJN losses. They had the US fleet sail out to meet the incoming fleet without the cover of the US Carriers. NOT a good outcome. I will dig and see if I can find the specifics on that study


They mentioned that scenario too on the History Channel.

The loss of trained sailors was the biggest difference and would have affected the outcome.

As it was we were able to "update" the fleet and send out newer ships with experienced crews.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group