Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri May 02, 2025 10:39 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:18 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
They have certainly come a long way! 8)

_________________
.
.
Sure, Charles Lindbergh flew the plane... but Tom Rutledge built the engine!

Visit Django Studios online or Facebook!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 2:29 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 3:37 pm
Posts: 2755
Location: Dayton, OH
Actually if I'm not mistaken, This is conglomeration of atleast 3 maybe 4 airframes. IIRC the Serial No.s are listed on previous threads. And the Ball turret depicted is the one from the Bar in Greenly CO.

Plans are to head up again this coming weekend. So I'll keep ya posted.

Would be great to have a WIX gatheing at Grimes Field one weekend and turn some wrenches and buck some rivets on the Champagne Lady. hint hint :D

Shay
____________
Semper Fortis


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 7:56 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 02, 2006 9:10 am
Posts: 9719
Location: Pittsburgher misplaced in Oshkosh
I am in for that. I am only two hours away

_________________
Chris Henry
EAA Aviation Museum Manager


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 8:32 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
Ztex wrote:
The corrugated material is inside the wing, under the skin.

You can see it here in one of Bill's pictures of Chuckie. This hole is where the inboard fuel bladder goes.
Image


Thanks for that Zane! I learned something new! I wasn't aware. Does anyone know what the purpose of that corrugated skin is? Why not just put the regular non-corrugated skin there instead?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 9:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 6:21 am
Posts: 21
I believe it adds strength. Two pieces of aluminum same thickness. One is flat, one is corrugated. The flat piece will bend, the other will not. Look at the Ford Trimotor.

Great to see this bird coming along. I love the noseart idea. And where are all the rest of the aircraft located? Different hanger I am guessing?

john

_________________
"You know you've landed with the wheels up when it takes full power to taxi."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 9:13 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
Warbirdjohn wrote:
I believe it adds strength. Two pieces of aluminum same thickness. One is flat, one is corrugated. The flat piece will bend, the other will not. Look at the Ford Trimotor.

Great to see this bird coming along. I love the noseart idea. And where are all the rest of the aircraft located? Different hanger I am guessing?

john


So, it's purely for structural integrity then? Why doesn't the B-29 have it?

Any one know of any other aircraft from W.W.Il that utilizes that concept of corrugated metal?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 9:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 10:20 pm
Posts: 237
Location: Palatine, Illinois
tom d. friedman wrote:
i wondered the same thing as warbird 1, but i can't figure where that crinkled corregated metal fits in with the construction of a 17. is it some form of a working jig??


The B-17 uses truss ribs with a sheet of corrugated metal used as stiffeners,
instead of individual stringers. The outer skin is then riveted to the corrugation.
The sheet thickness varies over the span of the wing. The corrugated skin for
the stress panels under the fuel tanks are made from thicker material.

Finding corrugated 2024-T3 - that's a feat!

_________________
-Bill
B-17E 41-2595 "Desert Rat" Restoration Team


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 9:38 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
Corrugated skin is a 1930s method.
P-38 has a similar construction in center wing and outer wing.
Center wing actually has a inner skin, corrugation and then outer skin between the main spar and the rear spar.
Rich

_________________
Rich Palmer

Remember an Injured Youth
benstear.org
#64- Stay Strong and Keep the Faith

BOOM BOOM, ROUND ROUND, PROPELLER GO

Don't Be A Dilbert!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 10:22 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
51fixer wrote:
Corrugated skin is a 1930s method.
P-38 has a similar construction in center wing and outer wing.
Center wing actually has a inner skin, corrugation and then outer skin between the main spar and the rear spar.
Rich


I didn't know that. Thanks for that info, Rich. Anyone have pix of the P-38 setup?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:50 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11319
Lockheed Electra (think Amelia Earhart) has corrugated inner wing structure just like the P-38.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:55 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
bdk wrote:
Lockheed Electra (think Amelia Earhart) has corrugated inner wing structure just like the P-38.


Thanks BDK, I didn't know that either! So, it sounds like the corrugated strengtheners were pretty popular on the early Lockheed models. Did any of that transition into the jet age, i.e. P-80's, etc.?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 6:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 4:42 pm
Posts: 441
Interesting post. I've just finished reading the first part of a series of articles published about the Handley Page Victor[1], one of the British V bombers (the others being the Vulcan and the Valiant) in Le Fana de L'Aviation[2]. Amazing aircraft, never thought its first flight was in 1952.

Now, in the text is stated (loose translation):

"Because the aircraft should operate mostly at high altitude, the thickness of most of exterior covering panels of the wing was determined by the interior pressure of the fuel. Because this last [the fuel] was distributed, these panels were build using a sandwich technique: corrugated skin between sheets of plane metal skins, riveted to the interior of the wing and point welded to the exterior. This process produced a remarkable smooth covering, but originated a few problems because all the weld points needed to be inspected for quality purposes. A program was developed, using an automatic, remotely controlled X-Ray machine. This was the first time that the working skin of an aeroplane was point welded"

I'm still amazed, 1952 and it still looks sci-fi.

[1] For the Victor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Handley_Page_Victor
[2] n 481, December 2009. This mag just made 40 years, let's hope it keeps going strong

_________________
rreis

If you want pictures, see rreis@flickr


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 7:17 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Great report. I too, wasn't aware of the corrigated inner skin on the B-17 wing, but had come across it elsewhere.

One other is the Boulton Paul Defiant, used in the fuselage as a strengthening liner.

Image

Uh, oh, GREMLINS! :lol:

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 1:03 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11319
warbird1 wrote:
So, it sounds like the corrugated strengtheners were pretty popular on the early Lockheed models. Did any of that transition into the jet age, i.e. P-80's, etc.?


T-33 didn't so I suspect the P-80 didn't either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 8:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:05 pm
Posts: 913
Location: ELP
The placard on the fwd fuselage shows the serial as 44-85813. I know that several airframes have donated parts for this restoration, but for some reason 813 sounded very familiar. Digging through some ancient Instamatic shots (remember C126 film?) I found a shot of 813 at Alamogordo, NM in about 1977. At that time she was owned and operated by Black Hills Aviation. In 1980 (?) she crashed on takeoff and supposedly the remains were bulldozed into a pit and buried.

They are poor shots, but here goes:

Image

Image

Image

_________________
Had God intended for man to fly behind inline engines, Pratt & Whitney would have made them.

CB

http://www.angelfire.com/dc/jinxx1/Desrt_Wings.html


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 80 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 326 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group