Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 11:16 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 1:29 pm
Posts: 88
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Doc Hospers at the Vintage Flying Museum in Fort Worth asked me to work on a display of prop blades to go with some of the engines in our engine display room. He sent me into the abyss to pull what I initially thought was a blade from a B-17, but upon closer examination it's either 1) not from a B-17 or 2) maybe an alternate blade style or 3) from something else entirely.

Here's what I know:
Our B-17 has the paddle style blades that have a fairly constant chord until almost at the root. This blade has what I would call a more common style of tapering chord down to the root. I'll get a picture.

Here's what is written on the blade:
SER NKSR-140
DWG 6359-18
LOW 24 AT 42
HIGH 90 AT 42 ('90' not clearly legible could be another number)

Stamped at the base: AMS 4130 CONT NOW 535 AC 25049 SHANK 56155 CHG-L

The blade is approximately 72" long and almost exactly 12" at the widest.
Any clues?

_________________
Hawkeye Poole
https://www.youtube.com/c/hawkeyepoole
franklin@pgctv.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:31 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
hawkeyepoole wrote:
Doc Hospers at the Vintage Flying Museum in Fort Worth asked me to work on a display of prop blades to go with some of the engines in our engine display room. He sent me into the abyss to pull what I initially thought was a blade from a B-17, but upon closer examination it's either 1) not from a B-17 or 2) maybe an alternate blade style or 3) from something else entirely.

Here's what I know:
Our B-17 has the paddle style blades that have a fairly constant chord until almost at the root. This blade has what I would call a more common style of tapering chord down to the root. I'll get a picture.

Here's what is written on the blade:
SER NKSR-140
DWG 6359-18
LOW 24 AT 42
HIGH 90 AT 42 ('90' not clearly legible could be another number)

Stamped at the base: AMS 4130 CONT NOW 535 AC 25049 SHANK 56155 CHG-L

The blade is approximately 72" long and almost exactly 12" at the widest.
Any clues?

Possibly A-26, B-25 and/or Avenger

Rich

_________________
Rich Palmer

Remember an Injured Youth
benstear.org
#64- Stay Strong and Keep the Faith

BOOM BOOM, ROUND ROUND, PROPELLER GO

Don't Be A Dilbert!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 11:58 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 9:29 pm
Posts: 1484
Location: Stockton, California
Rich is correct. The blade designation 6539A-18 is used on the B-25 and the A-26 but the TBM used the 6539A-12 so it would be too short for the TBM.

The NK in the serial number means it was made by Nash Kelvinator and the contract being AC (Air Corps) 535...is a typical WWII contract so I would easily bet it was made during the war.

B-25 blades are quite desirable these days. Ask Jaybo he will certainly give you the straight poop on its value.

_________________
To donate to the PV-2D project via PayPal click here http://www.twinbeech.com/84062restoration.htm

We brought her from: Image to this in 3 months: Image Help us get her all the way back Image

All donations are tax deductible as the Stockton Field Aviation Museum is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. Tell a friend as the Harpoon needs all the help she can get.

Thank you!

Taigh Ramey
Vintage Aircraft, Stockton, California
http://www.twinbeech.com
'KEEP ‘EM FLYING…FOR HISTORY!'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 9:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2005 1:17 pm
Posts: 153
Location: Lebanon, Tennessee USA
B-25 blade for the 23E50 hub
Most of the TBM's (and DC-4's) I've flown, had 6507's.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 1:29 pm
Posts: 88
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Thankx guys! I'll ID it as a 'likely' B-25 blade. This one is a non-serviceable unit. It'll just be a display piece. I may polish it up to make it pretty, and then re-stencil the data on the front surface. This particular blade, and its two sisters had most likely been on static display somewhere for years. Last night I stripped off: Clear, Black, Teal Blue, Red, Pale Green paint. Even the rubber boot had several coats of paint on it. The blade tip on this particular one looks like it was dipped into sand while running. The black paint appears to have been put on with a paint brush.

Can someone explain the "24 AT 42" and "90 AT 42" on the stencil? Reads like a tolerance, but of what?

_________________
Hawkeye Poole
https://www.youtube.com/c/hawkeyepoole
franklin@pgctv.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 10:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 10:20 pm
Posts: 237
Location: Palatine, Illinois
hawkeyepoole wrote:
Can someone explain the "24 AT 42" and "90 AT 42" on the stencil? Reads like a tolerance, but of what?


Those are the pitch angles - 24 degrees min - 90 degrees max (feathered).
However, I cannot remember what 42 means...

_________________
-Bill
B-17E 41-2595 "Desert Rat" Restoration Team


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 5:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 8:22 pm
Posts: 12
Location: Lakewood, CO
Probably measured at 42" radius from the center.

_________________
Years ago I started off with nothing ... and I still have most of it left.
-----------------------------------------
You know that as soon as they make something "idiotproof" they'll just invent a better idiot!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 1:29 pm
Posts: 88
Location: Fort Worth, TX
It's not likely a radius measurement. Each blade is 72" long for a radius of somewhere in the 75-78" range.

_________________
Hawkeye Poole
https://www.youtube.com/c/hawkeyepoole
franklin@pgctv.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 9:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 10:20 pm
Posts: 237
Location: Palatine, Illinois
hawkeyepoole wrote:
It's not likely a radius measurement. Each blade is 72" long for a radius of somewhere in the 75-78" range.


I believe TEN is right.
The blade pitch would be 90 degrees as measured 42" from the
centerline of the hub. It is not the blade length (prop radius),
which is what I believe you are suggesting.

_________________
-Bill
B-17E 41-2595 "Desert Rat" Restoration Team


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 14, 2009 11:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 1:29 pm
Posts: 88
Location: Fort Worth, TX
DOH! I misread the post the part "measured AT 42 inches". I just took a tape measure to the blade. 42" isn't quite at the widest part of the blade, but just shy, so that sounds reasonable to me. I learn something every day here!

_________________
Hawkeye Poole
https://www.youtube.com/c/hawkeyepoole
franklin@pgctv.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], MKD1966 and 239 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group