Sun Oct 11, 2009 8:49 pm
Sun Oct 11, 2009 8:56 pm
Sun Oct 11, 2009 8:58 pm
Sun Oct 11, 2009 9:15 pm
Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:29 pm
Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:37 pm
Sun Oct 11, 2009 10:48 pm
Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:49 am
Mon Oct 12, 2009 7:58 am
Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:20 am
Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:23 am
Mon Oct 12, 2009 9:59 am
Fouga23 wrote:And dummy question: What's the use of hand propping an engine? And for an Extra 300L. Don't those things have starter motors? Don't know anything about round engine thingies, Just think they look cool as coffe tables :p
Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:09 am
retroaviation wrote:Fouga23 wrote:And dummy question: What's the use of hand propping an engine? And for an Extra 300L. Don't those things have starter motors? Don't know anything about round engine thingies, Just think they look cool as coffe tables :p
The Extra has a cheap plastic firewall fitting for the heavy starter wire to go through (why they didn't just put the starter relay in front of the firewall is beyond me). So, after a few years of time, the plastic eventually melted, causing the cable to touch the stainless steel firewall, thus making the starter inop. Naturally, we didn't know that was the issue until after a fair amount of troubleshooting was done though, as the symptoms initally just pointed to the starter itself.
This particular airplane used to have hard starting issues, especially when hot, so we suspect that's what caused the plastic to melt over time. Anyway we solved the hard starting problem by adding a "shower of sparks" unit to the aircraft and it typically would start on the first or second blade when hot. Soooooo, in one of those instances where we needed to get going (I believe we were trying to get home before weather set in later in the day), the starter quit working, so I thought I'd give it propping it a try. With the pilot in place, and the normal starting procedure being done (other than me swinging on the prop), it was really a non-event. There is no way, however, that I'd try that on any fuel injected opposed engine that didn't have either impulse couplings on the mags or this hot little shower of sparks set up. Also, I knew this plane and it's habits very well, so the comfort factor of propping it was way up there. Had this been an airplane I wasn't familiar with, I likely wouldn't have tried it.
Sorry to hijack the thread.
Gary
Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:21 am
retroaviation wrote:The two most awkward airplanes I've hand propped are the T-6 and an Extra 300L.![]()
Gary
Mon Oct 12, 2009 12:12 pm