This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:28 pm

Yeah, I just want to see 927 on that field!!!!! :D

Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:34 pm

Warbird Kid wrote:Wonder if it would be possible to reconstruct the grass strip at Geneseo much like how Kermit did his B-29 capable runway at Fantasy of Flight? This would probably put a few minds to ease as far as strength and capability.


Aside from being grass and therefore sensitive to nose wheel aircraft, I'm not so sure that the runway really needs any work. I've landed on it before and it's pretty smooth and is definitely well established. There have certainly been a number of heavies that have flown off of the strip including a C-54, C-121, B-24, C-123, and C-130. Maybe someone else that has actually flown a large aircraft off of the field has better input since I've only landed there in a T-cart and Cherokee.

The areas that really need work IMO would be the taxiways, especially the parallel taxiway.

Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:42 pm

Jerry O'Neill wrote:They might need 6,000 feet for a B-29. I think the CAF's protocol for take off and landing the B-29 is 6K feet minimum.


6,000 ft. of paved runway.

Wed Sep 16, 2009 1:58 pm

retroaviation wrote:
Jerry O'Neill wrote:They might need 6,000 feet for a B-29. I think the CAF's protocol for take off and landing the B-29 is 6K feet minimum.


6,000 ft. of paved runway.


:lol: Wouldn't be willing to give it a shot on some turf Gary? :wink:

Wed Sep 16, 2009 3:06 pm

Not me. I'm done messing with that Organization and their airplanes.

Gary

Wed Sep 16, 2009 4:31 pm

Jamie, I was in the back of a B-25 sliding past center stage with Brickendon and Tavenor! Fun ride, landed right after a rain shower!
Anti-skid would have been nice but don't think it would have mattered on grass!

Wed Sep 16, 2009 4:40 pm

85,000 pounds of Slip-N-Slide!!! Yup, that would be REAL fun! :shock:

Wed Sep 16, 2009 4:41 pm

No date that the B-23 will be shipped to Geneseo still?

Wed Sep 16, 2009 7:18 pm

Warbird Kid wrote:No date that the B-23 will be shipped to Geneseo still?


Im working on collecting donations for that.

Wed Sep 16, 2009 8:27 pm

Nathan wrote:
Warbird Kid wrote:No date that the B-23 will be shipped to Geneseo still?


Im working on collecting donations for that.


Keep it up good buddy! I didn't even know you were helping on the B-23, cool! I think the target for getting it here in November-ish, not sure though.

- Austin Hancock

Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:28 pm

retroaviation wrote:
Jerry O'Neill wrote:They might need 6,000 feet for a B-29. I think the CAF's protocol for take off and landing the B-29 is 6K feet minimum.


6,000 ft. of paved runway.


How about 6,000 feet of PSP instead?
Would that work Gary! :lol:

Thu Sep 17, 2009 8:45 am

:lol:
Post a reply