Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Apr 04, 2026 1:20 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 9:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:30 pm
Posts: 472
Location: Dallas/Fort Worth Texas
Glad to hear that the pilot is ok. I wonder where in Ft. Worth it was heading? We've already got one T-33, and I don't think we can fit a second one in the hangar with the 19 other planes we have!

Be careful out there everyone, there's been too many losses lately!

_________________
Bill Gorin
Vintage Flying Museum
http://www.vintageflyingmuseum.org
https://www.facebook.com/#!/group.php?gid=57513906106


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 10:08 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 1318
Location: Waukesha Wisconsin
CrewDawg wrote:
Glad to hear that the pilot is ok. I wonder where in Ft. Worth it was heading? We've already got one T-33, and I don't think we can fit a second one in the hangar with the 19 other planes we have!

Be careful out there everyone, there's been too many losses lately!


The T-33 in this mishap (former RCAF #648) wasn't headed to Ft. Worth, though the owner was described by the news article as being from that area. The Canadian Forces public affairs officer quoted by the newspaper was confusing this aircraft with former RCAF T-33 #165 that was recently ferried to the Ft. Worth area. Again, glad nobody was hurt, but I feel horrible for the owner and ferry pilot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 2:47 pm
Posts: 425
Source CADORS (Civil Aviation Daily Occurrence Reporting System)

Quote:
UPDATE Supplemental information received from T.S.B. Initial Notification [#A09O0137]: The privately-owned, U.S.-registered T-33 airplane (serial number 133648) was taking off on runway 24 at C.F.B. Trenton on an IFR ferry flight to Fort Wayne, Indiana. Immediately after the airplane became airborne, the left armament door opened. The pilot followed the AOI emergency procedure and landed the airplane on the remaining runway. The pilot was unable to stop in the approximately 2,000 feet distance remaining. As the airplane overran the runway end, the pilot steered it to the right to avoid the approach lights for runway 06. The airplane came to a stop within the airfield boundary. During the landing sequence, both tip tanks contacted the runway resulting in a fuel leak (but there was no fire). The pilot egressed uninjured. The airplane sustained substantial damage. The operator reported that the upper forward armament door latch appears not to have been properly engaged despite having been checked by two (2) people prior to flight. He also reported finding physical contact between the door and an internal shelf that may have affected the rigging of the door latches and associated mechanisms.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 4:30 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 10:14 am
Posts: 1695
Location: canada
Thanks for the post update Brian. I wondr if this will turn in to an A.D for airworthy T33's worldwide?

_________________
Cheers,
Peter

________


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 5:21 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3299
Location: Phoenix, Az
peter wrote:
Thanks for the post update Brian. I wondr if this will turn in to an A.D for airworthy T33's worldwide?


Most likely not, alot of the T-33s have had the nose bays reworked during thier lives. It sounds like a case of CYA.

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 2:21 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
Question for Paul and any other current T-33 drivers regarding this statement from the CADORS:

"The pilot followed the AOI emergency procedure and landed the airplane on the remaining runway. The pilot was unable to stop in the approximately 2,000 feet distance remaining."


What exactly does the manual say regarding an open armament bay on takeoff? What would happen if the aircraft continued the takeoff after the armament bay opened up and landed it after going around the pattern? Does it affect the aerodynamics so severely that it would cause aircraft controllability problems? Obviously there has to be a point beyond which you wouldn't abort the takeoff - like past your go/no-go speed, right? Two thousand feet remaining sounds like an awfully short distance to abort a takeoff at, especially for a jet. I'm not trying to second guess the pilot's decision to abort, but rather trying to understand what the Dash 1 says in regards to this situation.

Anyone?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 2:44 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:49 am
Posts: 1635
Location: Belgium
warbird1 wrote:
Question for Paul and any other current T-33 drivers regarding this statement from the CADORS:

"The pilot followed the AOI emergency procedure and landed the airplane on the remaining runway. The pilot was unable to stop in the approximately 2,000 feet distance remaining."



What exactly does the manual say regarding an open armament bay on takeoff? What would happen if the aircraft continued the takeoff after the armament bay opened up and landed it after going around the pattern? Does it affect the aerodynamics so severely that it would cause aircraft controllability problems? Obviously there has to be a point beyond which you wouldn't abort the takeoff - like past your go/no-go speed, right? Two thousand feet remaining sounds like an awfully short distance to abort a takeoff at, especially for a jet. I'm not trying to second guess the pilot's decision to abort, but rather trying to understand what the Dash 1 says in regards to this situation.

Anyone?

I Think he made a wise decision. I'd hate for the door to come off in flight and hit the tail or worse!

_________________
Magister Aviation
It's all in my book

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 2:50 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
Fouga23 wrote:
warbird1 wrote:
Question for Paul and any other current T-33 drivers regarding this statement from the CADORS:

"The pilot followed the AOI emergency procedure and landed the airplane on the remaining runway. The pilot was unable to stop in the approximately 2,000 feet distance remaining."



What exactly does the manual say regarding an open armament bay on takeoff? What would happen if the aircraft continued the takeoff after the armament bay opened up and landed it after going around the pattern? Does it affect the aerodynamics so severely that it would cause aircraft controllability problems? Obviously there has to be a point beyond which you wouldn't abort the takeoff - like past your go/no-go speed, right? Two thousand feet remaining sounds like an awfully short distance to abort a takeoff at, especially for a jet. I'm not trying to second guess the pilot's decision to abort, but rather trying to understand what the Dash 1 says in regards to this situation.

Anyone?

I Think he made a wise decision. I'd hate for the door to come off in flight and hit the tail or worse!


I'm not casting judgement, I just want to know what the manual says about it. I don't know if the door would have come off in flight. On some airplanes, open access doors/panels are not a serious threat, only an increase in drag and consequently fuel consumption. I don't know what happens on the T-33, hence my question.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 8:38 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3299
Location: Phoenix, Az
I don;t know about the T-33, but the F-80 manual does not say anything about ammo doors opening. I believe it is pilots choice as to land or go around. If there was any loose gear in the nose bay, such as canopy covers, I know I would not want to fly with the door open and run the chance of a canopy cover coming out and being sucked into the engine.

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 9:09 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 1318
Location: Waukesha Wisconsin
The open armament door will cause aircraft to yaw and disrupt lift to the point the airplane won't fly. It is possible to keep angle of attack and speed low to keep door from fully opening. Once fully open, you are toast. The key is gentle turns, low angle of attack and extend speedbrake to create a low pressure area and hopefully cause the armament door to close. The pilot at Trenton did the right thing IMHO.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:30 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
T33driver wrote:
The open armament door will cause aircraft to yaw and disrupt lift to the point the airplane won't fly. It is possible to keep angle of attack and speed low to keep door from fully opening. Once fully open, you are toast. The key is gentle turns, low angle of attack and extend speedbrake to create a low pressure area and hopefully cause the armament door to close. The pilot at Trenton did the right thing IMHO.


Wow, I didn't know it was that serious of a problem! Thanks for the input Paul! From what little I know about the T-33, it sounds like that might be one of the more serious problems you could encounter on takeoff. Are there any more serious takeoff emergencies, other than the obvious, like engine failure, fire, etc. that are that serious in nature, that one might not otherwise expect to be?

Given it's apparently highly serious potential for disaster, are any T-33 owners modifying their jets by either putting different or more secure fasteners on their armament bay doors, or possibly safety-wiring them shut? Or do most owners just use the door as originally made? Is there any requirement for easy, daily access to that bay prior to each flight, or is it one of those things that could easily be safety-wired shut with no adverse access/inspection issues?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 4:58 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 1318
Location: Waukesha Wisconsin
warbird1 wrote:
T33driver wrote:
The open armament door will cause aircraft to yaw and disrupt lift to the point the airplane won't fly. It is possible to keep angle of attack and speed low to keep door from fully opening. Once fully open, you are toast. The key is gentle turns, low angle of attack and extend speedbrake to create a low pressure area and hopefully cause the armament door to close. The pilot at Trenton did the right thing IMHO.


Wow, I didn't know it was that serious of a problem! Thanks for the input Paul! From what little I know about the T-33, it sounds like that might be one of the more serious problems you could encounter on takeoff. Are there any more serious takeoff emergencies, other than the obvious, like engine failure, fire, etc. that are that serious in nature, that one might not otherwise expect to be?

Given it's apparently highly serious potential for disaster, are any T-33 owners modifying their jets by either putting different or more secure fasteners on their armament bay doors, or possibly safety-wiring them shut? Or do most owners just use the door as originally made? Is there any requirement for easy, daily access to that bay prior to each flight, or is it one of those things that could easily be safety-wired shut with no adverse access/inspection issues?


Along with an engine fire/failure, the armament door is one of the most serious takeoff emergencies one can face in a T-33. Being fully loaded with fuel naturally exacerbates any problem such as a blown tire, open armament door etc. as you now have the additional issue of high gross weight and being able to get the airplane stopped during the abort in the available runway...whether to jettison fully loaded tip tanks on the abort which can create another obvious hazard. The flight manual leaves it up to the pilot depending on the situation and just says it should be considered but...... Historically armament door security has been attributed to human error so the issue of the electronics shelf on the Canadian Avionics Modernization Program aka "AUP" T-33s is a new one on me. Erring on the side of caution, a bunch of us have checked our AUP T-33s for shelf interference with the armamant door latch that was said to be a factor in the recent Trenton mishap and we found them to have plenty of clearance and functioning normally. I don't know of any owners that have modified their armament doors with redundant mechanisms...doesn't mean there aren't any out there. There isn't a reason to do that as long as the latches are functioning normally. He11, I'm not gonna put a safety wire on my canopy lock lever, just don't grope it in flight i.e. the usual care, concentration and situational awareness. There are preflight items in the armament compartment such as circuit breakers, brake reservoir, battery connections to name the big ones...maybe some operators don't preflight that stuff every time but I do...not saying I'm right or better, probably the treachery of my military training that makes me so anal. Having said all that, preflight armament door security is a high emphasis item in the flight manual preflight section and in any T-33 pilot training syllabus that's worth a sh1t since you're a dead man if it opens all the way, and likely a dead man if it's partially open. Again, my hat's off to the pilot of the recent Trenton mishap jet.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 5:04 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 6:08 pm
Posts: 2595
Location: Mississippi
T33driver wrote:
The pilot at Trenton did the right thing IMHO.


But what do YOU know? :P :lol:

I can only imagine that this would be a pucker factor 9 situation. Getting it down must have been a real adventure, eh?

_________________
"I knew the jig was up when I saw the P-51D-20-NA Mustang blue-nosed bastards from Bodney, and by the way the blue was more of a royal blue than an indigo and the inner landing gear interiors were NOT green, over Berlin."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 5:04 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 6:25 pm
Posts: 2760
Thanks a lot for that response Paul, that was most informative!

One last question - can that armament bay area be used for storage - i.e. - as a luggage storage area for cross country flights, etc.? If not, where is the baggage storage area on the T-33, if there is one?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jul 22, 2009 5:20 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:35 pm
Posts: 1318
Location: Waukesha Wisconsin
warbird1 wrote:
Thanks a lot for that response Paul, that was most informative!

One last question - can that armament bay area be used for storage - i.e. - as a luggage storage area for cross country flights, etc.? If not, where is the baggage storage area on the T-33, if there is one?


Muddy, I dunno sheeyat but yah the door popping open would be a huge pucker factor!!


Yes it can and I stow my intake/tailpipe plugs, and travel duffle in there. No two T-33 armament compartments are configured the same. I also have a luggage pod that attaches to the JATO mounts on the belly but haven't used it since there's an 8% fuel economy penalty and a speed limit and then the hassle of removing it for air show flying and reinstalling it after the airshow.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group