Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed May 14, 2025 3:14 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 9:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:50 am
Posts: 237
I once had access to it when Al White was still alive and now I wish I had been more diligent.

Does anybody have a copy or know where it can be found? All I can find on the web is the Wright Pat report for 1946 by USAAF.

Thanks,

Bill Marshall


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 12:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 14, 2005 12:23 am
Posts: 321
Go to the WWII Aircraft Performance site run by Mike Williams and Neil Stirling. They have Report NA-8284-A, P-51H of 9-25-44 revised 11-1-45.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 1:11 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 2:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:50 am
Posts: 237
Guys - thanks for the site ref to Mike Williams but I have that data.

The NAA report dated 9/44, then revised, is the Performance Calculation for submission to USAAF when first P-51H rolled off production line in Feb 1945. This calc was for 1650-9(at 90" with W/I) with racks at 9450 pounds

The Flight test at Wright Pat in April 1945 and Oct 1946 are the only one I know of by the Army.

It is curious that the USAAF 1945 tests were with racks and 9544 pounds gross weight - but the max top speed at 31K (450+) with 67" boost in the 1650-9 had the same speed as the 1946 tests at 90". Also interesting is that the critical altitude at 67" for the P-51H-1 was 30,750 ft, while the P-51H-5 CA at 90" was 21,200 ft - same engine theoretically.

NAA performed flight tests in Feb/Mar of 1945 at different configurations to get best climb performance in interceptor config - (no fuel in fuselage tank and no wing racks)... to get 487mph.. but I have no idea what else was different.

This is the Test that yielded the "487mph" top speed at 90" with W/I was completed in March, 1945... but I have not seen the report to understand what the precise configuration was.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Apr 20, 2009 5:50 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11319
Do you have the report number or title of the paper?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 3:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:50 am
Posts: 237
bdk wrote:
Do you have the report number or title of the paper?


Nope - it was a NAA Document but I don't have the exact date or title.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 5:14 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11319
That makes it a bit of a challenge. If it was a NACA report it would likely be publically available. As an NAA document it would be proprietary and maybe only available to historians willing to research the NAA archives, now residing with Boeing either in Cypress, CA or in the Puget Sound area.

The Boeing library does not list anything online for the P-51H.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 21, 2009 7:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:50 am
Posts: 237
I know - I actually tried those paths with futile results. Thanks for the feedback!

Regards,

Bill


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 276 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group