Thu Apr 09, 2009 4:46 am
JDK wrote:bootlegger wrote:Spitfires are one of my favourite aircraft but a 2 seater just doesnt turn me on. It just doesnt look right the extra canopy looks exactly like it is, an after thought.
The second hole isn't for looks - it's for rides. For that reason, there's a future for the two seaters. How do you think it would 'look' to you were you sitting in it? (NB alternative is 'no ride'.)
Thu Apr 09, 2009 5:24 am
bootlegger wrote: Is there no room in the rear to fit a jump seat like has been done in other fighters and not ruin the clean lines of the original?
Thu Apr 09, 2009 11:06 am
The (until last year) flying T.9 in the US (TE308) is down for repairs so the only flying examples anywhere are the five in the UK. There is a further example, the unique prototype T.8, under refurbishment in UK, possibly to fly later this year (previously in the US with Jack Erickson). Another, MH367, is under repair following a landing mis-hap in New Zealand earlier this year.Bluedharma wrote:Mark,
How many of those original 20 are still around? Is it just the 5 flying in the UK and the 1 here in the States? Are there any more being worked on?
Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:08 pm
Thu Apr 09, 2009 3:57 pm
www.dailymail.co.uk wrote:'Anyone could fly it straight and level,' says Peter Tuplin, managing director of Classic Aero Engineering, the company that has carried out the restoration.
'I could teach you to do that, though I wouldn't be much good at teaching you how to land it, unfortunately.
It's very easy to fly, but it's also very easy to get into trouble with.'
Thu Apr 09, 2009 4:31 pm
Fri Apr 10, 2009 12:33 pm
Tony Samuelson wrote:You have to fly a Spitfire to understand what the feeling is when you are taking off. I only ever did it once for real but the sensation is unforgettable. The Merlin engine is supercharged and it is necessary to pull full power to get the aeroplane off the ground. Getting the undercarriage up so that you can reduce the power is a top priority because twelve pounds of boost, which is the figure that comes into my mind, is only ever used in combat and, after five minutes of that, the engine has to be thrown away. As it speeds up along the runway the plane wants to yaw to the left and to compensate the pilot has to boot the right rudder with all his might. (Or it may be right yaw and left rudder. This is thirty years ago.). Meanwhile the engine is screaming and flames are belching from every exhaust port.
39. Take-off
At training and normal loads + 7 lb./sq.in. to + 9 lb./xq.in. boost is sufficient for take-off. After take-off, however boost should be increased (where applicable) to + 12lb./sq.in. to minimize the possibility of lead fouling of the sparking plugs.
Fri Apr 10, 2009 1:33 pm
Bluedharma wrote:I was reading the story by Tony Samuelson, that he posted regarding his adventures in a two seat spit in 1968-1969.
http://www.samuelson.co.uk/blog/?p=70#more-70
But I am somewhat confused by his statements.Tony Samuelson wrote:You have to fly a Spitfire to understand what the feeling is when you are taking off. I only ever did it once for real but the sensation is unforgettable. The Merlin engine is supercharged and it is necessary to pull full power to get the aeroplane off the ground. Getting the undercarriage up so that you can reduce the power is a top priority because twelve pounds of boost, which is the figure that comes into my mind, is only ever used in combat and, after five minutes of that, the engine has to be thrown away. As it speeds up along the runway the plane wants to yaw to the left and to compensate the pilot has to boot the right rudder with all his might. (Or it may be right yaw and left rudder. This is thirty years ago.). Meanwhile the engine is screaming and flames are belching from every exhaust port.
But on page 22 of the Spitfire IX, XI & XVI notes it says:39. Take-off
At training and normal loads + 7 lb./sq.in. to + 9 lb./xq.in. boost is sufficient for take-off. After take-off, however boost should be increased (where applicable) to + 12lb./sq.in. to minimize the possibility of lead fouling of the sparking plugs.
You don't have to throw the engine away after five minutes of 12...Right?
He also says engines last about 200 hours. They last longer than that??? don't they?
Cheers.
Sun Apr 19, 2009 11:12 am
Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:39 am
Mon Apr 20, 2009 11:37 am
Mon Apr 20, 2009 2:16 pm
Tue Apr 21, 2009 1:40 pm
Tue Apr 21, 2009 8:29 pm
SHAEF1944 wrote:The Daily Mail newspaper quoted him as saying: "I'm a great believer that things like this were built to be used, not to be museum pieces."