M16 vs. 51

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.

This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply
Jack Cook
  • Jack Cook
  • Posts: 11475
  • Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
  • Location: Salem, Oregon

M16 vs. 51

Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:26 pm

Image
I'll take the M16 :!: :!:
The Inspector
  • The Inspector
  • Posts: 7961
  • Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
  • Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.

Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:18 am

about a push on mileage -and the same on buzz factor, swingin' 4 .50's over to change lanes or blowing the doors off a St Louis plasticmobile (vette) :D
muddyboots
  • muddyboots
  • Posts: 2595
  • Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 6:08 pm
  • Location: Mississippi

Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:33 am

that mustang is about 75% plastic now too :)
Robbie Roberts
  • Robbie Roberts
  • Posts: 1179
  • Joined: Thu Mar 20, 2008 5:04 am
  • Location: Merchantville, NJ

Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:37 am

And Vettes (Cor, Not Chev) are fiblegrass- uh, fiberglass, anyway... Not plastic...

Robbie :roll:
John Dupre
  • John Dupre
  • Posts: 1216
  • Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:52 pm
  • Location: Hudson, MA

Sun Dec 21, 2008 11:43 am

Robbie Roberts wrote:And Vettes (Cor, Not Chev) are fiblegrass- uh, fiberglass, anyway... Not plastic...

Robbie :roll:


The British term is GRP Glass Reinforced Plastic :wink:
Jack Cook
  • Jack Cook
  • Posts: 11475
  • Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
  • Location: Salem, Oregon

???

Sun Dec 21, 2008 12:29 pm

I was sitting on this when I took the photo 8)
Image
Image
Post a reply
Switch to full style

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.

phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.

Board index