Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:10 pm
Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:15 pm
mustanglover wrote:Statistics only work for those who are presenting them
Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:22 pm
JDK wrote:mustanglover wrote:Statistics only work for those who are presenting them
Well, some statistics would be better than peanut retrieval. If we care about aviation we should be able to advocate for it. Yet, clearly, even here, people can't.
I'm not sure where the two and three dimensions particularly influence risk. You might as well say the cash requirement difference between cars and aircraft is a factor.
Wed Sep 10, 2008 12:09 am
JDK wrote:mustanglover wrote:Statistics only work for those who are presenting them
Well, some statistics would be better than peanut retrieval. If we care about aviation we should be able to advocate for it. Yet, clearly, even here, people can't.
I'm not sure where the two and three dimensions particularly influence risk. You might as well say the cash requirement difference between cars and aircraft is a factor.
Wed Sep 10, 2008 4:08 pm
Mike wrote:I wonder how many funerals of hockey players killed during the game you went to during those 7 years, versus how many aviation buddies killed in flying accidents your father helped bury over the years?
Aviation IS dangerous - fact. I base this on the numbers of people I've known (some close friends) killed over the years I've been involved in aviation, sadly, far more than in any other occupation I can think of.
Wed Sep 10, 2008 6:50 pm
Hellcat wrote:IMHO ... and I advocate aviation everyday, as well as everyone else here on WIX, that's why this website and others like it are around. WTF!
Sorry, but you'll never be able to change your friends or public perception on the dangers of aviation if aviation is not in your blood, it never will be. It is what it is.
Prove me wrong, and how are YOU changing public perception
Wed Sep 10, 2008 7:06 pm
Wed Sep 10, 2008 11:51 pm
Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:01 am
Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:05 am
Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:19 am
muddyboots wrote: It's all about perception, and a big engine with a buzz saw attached to it is going to get lots more attention (no matter how true) than a car. Everybody drives cars. They aren't scary, unless a teenager (or maybe Eric) is behind the wheel. We're used to cars. But you don't see a thousand airplanes zipping around all day with very few accidents. However, it seems like almost every time you see an airplane in the news or on TV...it's spiraling into the ground with a bunch of nuns tied to the wings, and there's a busload of challenged children singing "jesus loves me" in its trajectory. I mean, it's all about perspective and perseption, you know?
Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:28 am
ZRX61 wrote:muddyboots wrote: It's all about perception, and a big engine with a buzz saw attached to it is going to get lots more attention (no matter how true) than a car. Everybody drives cars. They aren't scary, unless a teenager (or maybe Eric) is behind the wheel. We're used to cars. But you don't see a thousand airplanes zipping around all day with very few accidents. However, it seems like almost every time you see an airplane in the news or on TV...it's spiraling into the ground with a bunch of nuns tied to the wings, and there's a busload of challenged children singing "jesus loves me" in its trajectory. I mean, it's all about perspective and perseption, you know?
The last big loss of spectator life at a car race (IIRC) was LeMans in '55(?) when the engine of a car that had just wrecked went thru the crowd at head height with fairly predictable results. Something like 80 deaths & in the video I saw there's a rather gruesome sound not unlike someone smashing cabbages with a large mallet..
Mass fatalities have been more recent at airshows (Rammstein etc)
Thu Sep 11, 2008 6:40 am
Thu Sep 11, 2008 12:13 pm
Thu Sep 11, 2008 1:03 pm
JDK wrote:Hellcat wrote:IMHO ... and I advocate aviation everyday, as well as everyone else here on WIX, that's why this website and others like it are around. WTF!
Actually there's also a fair ammout of big-watch posing and more wanna have a big-watch posing. How much that helps aviation is a question.Sorry, but you'll never be able to change your friends or public perception on the dangers of aviation if aviation is not in your blood, it never will be. It is what it is.
Must remember to not bother then.That's quite the self-fulfilling prophecy, and politely, I think it's also balls.
Prove me wrong, and how are YOU changing public perception
Oh, taking people to airshows who've never been 'because it's dangerous'.
Showing people around an aviation museum who've never been because...
Explaining how and why aircraft work, so people get some facts, rather than 'they all crash and everyone dies'...
Helping publicise the rebuild of a replica aircraft to show some aviation history to people who didn't care and wouldn't know because it's dangerous...
Writing about it, based on facts, because...
I could go on.
I've yet to meet someone who was passionate about aviation without ever seeing it. You've got to start somewhere.
Some people don't reckon it's about posing as a daredevil but trying to win friends and influence people. It can and does work; it may not be cool, or have a big-watch, but it might help stop getting your local airfield built over and closed down.
More relevantly to this thread, airshows, aerobatics (competition) and air racing should be regarded in their own niches as they have, IMHO, different types of risk acceptance and possible control - anyone got views on that?
Regards,