Jack Cook wrote:
Having a had a cousin who was killed by a drunk driver I'm just
not finding the humor in this.

I'm with you on this one. There are times when I think the old Hebrew method of stoning for those who commit certain capitol offenses - might not be such a bad idea. Brutal, yes, graphic, yes - but do you think that people would get the point? If one person, who was guilty of a crime died, but it woke people up to the consequences of their actions, and 50% of them stopped drinking and driving and good folks didn't die needless deaths, then maybe it would really be worth it. Folks just get off too easy. I've heard of stories where someone had a habit of getting drunk, had accidents before, killed more than one person in a crash, and only served a minimal amount of time. That's just WRONG.
Certainly getting smashed to death in a car is brutal as well. Now if there is legitimate grounds for dispute over the situation - fine. I'm all for everyone getting a fair trial, but if you can prove to me that someone knowingly took a risk and did something that stupid anyway - well, they don't have my sympathy. They needed to find another way to deal with the stress in their life, or whatever it was that caused them to drink irresponsibly.
Mind you, I'm talking about situations where actual deaths are involved. Not the Wagstaff situation.
Ryan
_________________
Aerial Photographer with
Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites:
Texas Tailwheel Flight Training,
DoolittleRaid.com and
Lbirds.com.
The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31
- Train, Practice, Trust.