This is the place where the majority of the warbird (aircraft that have survived military service) discussions will take place. Specialized forums may be added in the new future
Post a reply

Update on Beech C-45 accident

Sun Aug 05, 2007 5:50 pm

I recieved a call from Stan Peterson re his accident in the CAF Twin Beech. He has serious injuries, broken femur, 3 ribs, minor cuts but not life threatening. The co pilot had cuts bruises no breaks, neither had any real burns. The cause appears to be failure of both engines due to loss of oil. They had those recycle or clean type drain valves on the lower clyinder rocker arms, and somehow they got left open. So a warning to anyone who has these on any radial, make sure they or closed preflight or I guess there is a spring loaded type that closes automatically. The plane had seat belts, but no shoulder harness and they hit trees on the way down breaking the windscreen. Stan kept control of the plane as best he could. They wern't that high when it happened.
Last edited by Bill Greenwood on Sat Aug 11, 2007 8:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Sun Aug 05, 2007 6:37 pm

Thank god nothing worse took place.

Sun Aug 05, 2007 6:49 pm

I am glad to hear that they both are ok , and neither had any real burns.
That is the most important thing.

The instructor pilot told the FAA inspector that he had simulated a right engine failure and the right propeller was feathered. Shortly thereafter, the left engine began running rough so they decided to bring the right engine back on-line. Shortly thereafter, both engines began running rough to the point that further flight could not be maintained.


Were they simulating a engine failure??? That is what the NTSB Preliminary said. Is that true?

http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20070730X01039&key=1

Re: Update on Beech C-45 accident

Sun Aug 05, 2007 7:22 pm

My R-755B2 has a drain valve on the lower oil return valve. I leave it closed normally - the only time I ever opened it was when I had a lock. (It didn't help) I don't have a proper 'clean-kit' but my understanding of the way they work is it is automatic. I'd rather deal with a messy belly than a real catastrophe.



Bill Greenwood wrote:I recieved a call from Stan Peterson re his accident in the CAF Twin Beech. He has serious injuries, broken femur, 3 ribs, minor cuts but not life threatening. The co pilot had cuts bruises no breaks, neither had any real burns. The cause appears to be failure of both engines due to loss of oil. They had those recycle or clean type drain valves on the lower clyinder rocker arms, and somehow they got left open. So a warning to anyone who has these on any radial, make sure they or closed preflight or I guess there is a spring loaded type that closes automatically. The plane had seat belts, but no shoulder harness and they hit trees on the way down breaking the windscreen. Stan kept control of the plane as best he could despite not being able to feather either engine. They wern't that high when it happened.

Sun Aug 05, 2007 8:24 pm

Why were they not able to feather the props?

The oil supply to the feather pumps comes from the bottom of the oil tank. The oil supply for the engines comes from a standpipe further up in the oil tanks. This assures a seperate oil supply for the props from the engines.

details

Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:16 pm

I don't know many details, I am not a D18 expert at all, I suppose the props feather by oil pressure and if all the oil ran out the open drains on both engines there was none left to feather the props. They had been practicing one engine, but I believe had unfeathered and gone back to both engine operation when the problem occured. They use the drains to sump out the oil in the lower clyinders when parked and recycle it, I think T-6 an T-28 owners may do the same. There may be a NTSB prelim report out.
Last edited by Bill Greenwood on Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:31 pm

Even if all of the oil ran out for the engines, there is still enough in the bottom of the tank to feather the prop, even if the engine is seized.

feather

Mon Aug 06, 2007 5:40 pm

Sky, it is always easy to fly a desk, or a desktop, and say how another pilot should have done it better. Perhaps you have a lot more experience with engine out twin landings than they do. My only one was in a T-34, about the easiest plane to land short of a glider. I hope I never have to do one for real in anything else. My post was to let folks know these guys survived and alert others to possible problem with the drains.

Mon Aug 06, 2007 11:34 pm

Bill, I think we have a misunderstanding here. I think the semi-question being posed here is that the oil tank on most P&W radials (especially those with Ham-Stan props) is setup where there should be sufficient oil left in the sump for the propeller hub in case of loss of engine oil to still be able to feather the propellers. So, if Stan was unable to get the props to feather, what could have happened to cause that "reserve" of oil to leave the engine and make it impossible to feather the prop?

My response to this is -

I'm not really even well acqainted with the D18, so my question is- was the aircraft equipped with feathering pumps? If not and the engines stopped too quickly, it's possible that there was insufficent pressure to feather the props. If it was equipped with feathering pumps, then it's a question that will have to be answered by the NTSB in the final report on the accident.

Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:35 pm

Sorry to bother everyone, but this is the first I've heard of this accident... when and where did it happen? Is it the same Beech that would have been in Niagara Falls this year?

Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:53 pm

Greg87 wrote:Sorry to bother everyone, but this is the first I've heard of this accident... when and where did it happen? Is it the same Beech that would have been in Niagara Falls this year?


I don't know if it was in Niagara Falls or not, but you can find out more here on the accident here:
http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/p ... hlight=c45

Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:55 pm

Here is a link to a follow up media story about the accident.
http://www.ktre.com/Global/story.asp?S=6871979&nav=2FH5
Glad they made it out!
Robbie

feather

Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:36 pm

I don't know much about feathering on the C45, but what difference does it really make? If both engines quit due to all the oil running out the drains you are going down. Feather may help the glide angle, or descent rate, but it isn't going to levitate. I am thankful they kept control.

Fri Aug 10, 2007 10:55 pm

Im just glad to know there were no life-threatening injuries...

Sat Aug 11, 2007 7:45 pm

Interesting discussion. Even if the drain was left open, it would take a long time for all the oil in a C45 to run out. There are standpipes to allow enough oil to remain in the event of a loss of oil for feathering, as was mentioned. Over the years of flying multi-engine aircraft I have come across a few that would have normal feather checks on the ground but would not feather in the air. On the C-45 I used to operate, we would feather each prop at least once a year in the air just to make sure it would still feather when needed.

My 2-cents fwiw.

Glenn
Post a reply