I don't have to do this, but for good manners, I will.
I asked Scott to delete the link, sight unseen, which he did. It appears I may have been a bit hasty, or over-reacted. Several people here have made good points, which I do take on board. I also appreciate the tone of the posts. Thank you, and this is not a disagreement, but an explanation, which I feel people are owed.
The reason I asked is simple. I was talking to the dedicated, passionate Mosquito crew a week before the accident, the same day the P-38 crashed with another fatality at Duxford. I had been talking safety with the P-38 pilot that morning, as ever, learning. I do not wish to revisit that particularly bleak week in British aviation, although I can understand that some have good reason for wishing to do so, as well as those who just like to watch crashes which is why u tube is full of them.
In this specific case, and in the case of the P-38 accident, I had the unenviable task, with Paul Coggan, of producing the AAIB accident reports in full in
Warbirds Worldwide. As you can imagine, we took extra-special care to ensure no errors crept in to those reports. We worked hard to ensure that the lessons, and none of the speculation, and no voyeuristic interest was disseminated as widely as possible in the Warbird community as we could, in that pre-internet era. For those operating Merlin engine aircraft the advice was sent out by Rolls Royce at the time (IIRC) and the lessons from the accident were thoroughly publicised at the time - I do not agree that the film or raw data has significant importance to the user-end of the report - back then. Time has elapsed, and there are new warbird operators on the scene who may not be conversant with the accident or conclusions.
King makes a good point regarding a professional accident investigation interest, but I would add that a good deal of most accident raw material is not released to the public domain, although accident investigation professionals, or those that need to know can get access to it, for good reasons.
There are no operational Mosquitos anywhere in the world, and while it's highly likely there will be, u-tube will
not be the means by which the crew brief on that accident and risk. Of course there are other types that can usefully use the lessons. But I do not agree that a video is a better means of the
operator understanding what actually happened than a full AAIB report, as kindly posted by D Fisher.
I'm not a pilot, nor an operator, I'm simply a writer on vintage aviation. I am passionate about the prevention of censorship. But there are exceptions. I'm not advocating the video be destoyed; but the viral nature of the internet has many issues.
However, I have very personal reasons for not wishing to view the link (and the one to the P-38 accident) and significant concerns over those links as posted on u-tube. Randy's right that no-one here is likely to be ghoulish about the matter, but the link
without the accident report does NOT explain the accident and is likely to engender casual speculation which some would find offensive. I'm highly appreciative of the tone of the discussion so far, which is why I've chosen to post.
If the price of re highlighting the AAIB report
here is a few kids on u-tube watching what they see as a computer-game level accident, then it's an acceptable price to pay.
I trust people can understand my position, I've troubled to explain my rationale, and the fact that I did work hard to ensuring that the lessons from accidents (sadly, these were not the only ones we ran in WW) were publicised for the warbird community.
I also trust people will understand that I am not keen to enter debate on the matter, for good, if personal reasons - but that I am not discounting the points made here by others either.
While I'm here, though I would like to pick up on Randy's last point:
Randy Haskin wrote:
Safety is not just something we pay lip service to. Safety is a mentality. Safety is a CULTURE that, frankly, the warbird community has not thoroughly institutionalized.
Sadly I have to agree, and I'm greatful a current military pilot said it, rather than me. The culture and mentality is NOT yet good enough in warbird operations. We all need to look to ourselves and be less forgiving of second-rate performance. I'm not pointing fingers, or trying to tell those, with skills I do not have, how to do it. I'm simply saying safety is no accident.
Thank you.
Link. The British Air Accident Investigation Branch:
http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/home/index.cfm
Edited to add ling to AAIB original accident report:
http://www.aaib.dft.gov.uk/publications ... 501355.cfm