Airframe Identification?
Posted: Wed Dec 04, 2013 10:25 pm
Need some identification help from the Harvard experts here. Sorry this is a bit long winded.
The T-6 I'm doing a static restoration on is identified by the NMUSAF as an AT-6B, and there are data plates in the plane that show the serial number that supports their records. However, there are a number of anomalies that just don't add up. My theory contains some reasonable assumptions, but I don't have enough solid information to reach a definite conclusion. This airframe was "acquired" from a civilian owner for use as a display on the grounds of Chanute Air Force Base back in 1985.
This "AT-6B" has some peculiarities.
First, the tail section appears to be from a Harvard, as it has the slot window on the top of the fuselage just forward of the vertical stab, and has a rectangular baggage compartment door. It also has the cut-out for a nav light on the top spine of the fuse.
The second indicator is the cockpit finishing strips. They appear to be mostly identical to the finishing strips shown in RCAF EO-05-55A-1 Pilots Operating Instructions and identified as Harvard Mk IV. They are completely different than those shown in the engineering drawings for SNJ/AT-6 models that I've found. The difference from Mk II and MK IIA right side strips are small angle brackets that appear to hold light bulbs to illuminate the radio control panels in both the front and rear cockpits in the Mk IV.
The instrument panels and two electrical panels are definitely AT-6D, and the Radio Call tag on the front panel has the number 80705. Of course I have no proof these were original to the airframe.
Putting together these facts, and after a little online research, I think this airframe might be a Harvard Mk III. I found this quote from a New Zealand Harvard site.
"In October 1943, the first of the RNZAF's new Mk III Harvards arrived. These all metal aircraft had a different electrical system from the Mk II, being 24 volt. They also had the US style cockpit layout as opposed to the British style Mk II that had been supplied under the Empire Air Training Scheme (or also known as the Commonwealth Air Training Plan)."
From what I can determine it appears the Harvard MkIII production coincided with AT-6D production.
The missing link for me are those cockpit finishing strips. If the Mk III contained British radio equipment, and, had finishing strips basically identical to the later Harvard Mk IV, then it would seem to be strong evidence that we have a MkIII airframe here.
I know I'm drawing a lot of conclusions on circumstantial evidence, but the pieces of the puzzle I have seem to fit my theory. I'm hoping there are some MkIII owners/experts that can help me verify my conclusions.
Here are the pics of the right side finishing strips I mentioned.




The T-6 I'm doing a static restoration on is identified by the NMUSAF as an AT-6B, and there are data plates in the plane that show the serial number that supports their records. However, there are a number of anomalies that just don't add up. My theory contains some reasonable assumptions, but I don't have enough solid information to reach a definite conclusion. This airframe was "acquired" from a civilian owner for use as a display on the grounds of Chanute Air Force Base back in 1985.
This "AT-6B" has some peculiarities.
First, the tail section appears to be from a Harvard, as it has the slot window on the top of the fuselage just forward of the vertical stab, and has a rectangular baggage compartment door. It also has the cut-out for a nav light on the top spine of the fuse.
The second indicator is the cockpit finishing strips. They appear to be mostly identical to the finishing strips shown in RCAF EO-05-55A-1 Pilots Operating Instructions and identified as Harvard Mk IV. They are completely different than those shown in the engineering drawings for SNJ/AT-6 models that I've found. The difference from Mk II and MK IIA right side strips are small angle brackets that appear to hold light bulbs to illuminate the radio control panels in both the front and rear cockpits in the Mk IV.
The instrument panels and two electrical panels are definitely AT-6D, and the Radio Call tag on the front panel has the number 80705. Of course I have no proof these were original to the airframe.
Putting together these facts, and after a little online research, I think this airframe might be a Harvard Mk III. I found this quote from a New Zealand Harvard site.
"In October 1943, the first of the RNZAF's new Mk III Harvards arrived. These all metal aircraft had a different electrical system from the Mk II, being 24 volt. They also had the US style cockpit layout as opposed to the British style Mk II that had been supplied under the Empire Air Training Scheme (or also known as the Commonwealth Air Training Plan)."
From what I can determine it appears the Harvard MkIII production coincided with AT-6D production.
The missing link for me are those cockpit finishing strips. If the Mk III contained British radio equipment, and, had finishing strips basically identical to the later Harvard Mk IV, then it would seem to be strong evidence that we have a MkIII airframe here.
I know I'm drawing a lot of conclusions on circumstantial evidence, but the pieces of the puzzle I have seem to fit my theory. I'm hoping there are some MkIII owners/experts that can help me verify my conclusions.
Here are the pics of the right side finishing strips I mentioned.



