Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Apr 30, 2025 11:40 pm


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:03 pm
Posts: 235
Anyone know what the correct model Waltham 22809-A 8 day clock for a 1949 T-6G model?

Image
Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 3:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:29 am
Posts: 40
Parts book says. AN-C99 or AN5743-1.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 28, 2014 4:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:03 pm
Posts: 235
If you look at the T-6G /Lt-6G parts catalog - AN 01-60FF A-4 page 42-43

-8 Clock - Aircraft type All (Spec. N0. AN-C99 or AN57431-1
Part # 1776 AN 05-35A6 (EG) manufactured by ELGIN
Part # 22809A AN 05-35A7 (WW) manufactured by WALTHAM



All three clocks shown above are WALTHAM 22809-A clocks but there are THREE variances in face plates for the same 22809-A part number.

What I should have clarified is whats the correct face plate of the three shown for a 1949 T-6G model?


So far my research points to the middle clock face listed above. I'm hopefully looking to acquire two matching clocks soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:29 am
Posts: 40
In North American's T-6 by Dan Hagedorn pg 143 the panel has clock that appears like your third image. The photo is small.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 8:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:03 pm
Posts: 235
I was able to track down a ww2 Aircraft clock specialist. He had about 30 or so used clocks he could built to replace mine. According to the part numbers for the G model it could have been the first or second picture. The part numbers match exactly for either face just depends at what time the order was placed. The third picture is actually a later vintage and doesn't have radium on the face.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 08, 2014 9:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:03 pm
Posts: 235
Boom.... scored 2 matching refurbished AN5743-1 Waltham 8 day clocks. Completely stock, cleaned and oiled.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2014 7:04 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
Recently had an FAA ASI look over a P-51 and he wanted a report of a survey of A/C records to show no radium was in any intruments.
Part of the conversation included this, and I quote-
"When you crash the last thing you want to deal with is a hazardous material cleanup."

_________________
Rich Palmer

Remember an Injured Youth
benstear.org
#64- Stay Strong and Keep the Faith

BOOM BOOM, ROUND ROUND, PROPELLER GO

Don't Be A Dilbert!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2014 7:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2014 8:44 am
Posts: 39
Location: Brisbane
Name and shame!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2014 3:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:03 pm
Posts: 235
51fixer wrote:
Recently had an FAA ASI look over a P-51 and he wanted a report of a survey of A/C records to show no radium was in any intruments.
Part of the conversation included this, and I quote-
"When you crash the last thing you want to deal with is a hazardous material cleanup."



Thats pretty interesting.... is there a mandate saying no radium face plates in aircraft ?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 09, 2014 10:35 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
Speeddemon651 wrote:
51fixer wrote:
Recently had an FAA ASI look over a P-51 and he wanted a report of a survey of A/C records to show no radium was in any intruments.
Part of the conversation included this, and I quote-
"When you crash the last thing you want to deal with is a hazardous material cleanup."



Thats pretty interesting.... is there a mandate saying no radium face plates in aircraft ?

I don't know of anything specific (FAA wise) but the Gov types seem to jump on anything radioactive. This FAA guy wanted us to borrow a geiger counter to test the cockpit. You might want to discreetly do your own research.
Remember Jeff Pearson's ordeal.
I know the Gov loan A/C have had instruments removed and notices painted on A/C regarding this.
Radium emits Alpha particles which I'm told won't penetrate the skin. Danger is in ingesting material by breathing dust or transfer to mouth as in the workers sharpening brush tips by using their lips. Very inert I'm told otherwise, however, fly using them at your own risk.

_________________
Rich Palmer

Remember an Injured Youth
benstear.org
#64- Stay Strong and Keep the Faith

BOOM BOOM, ROUND ROUND, PROPELLER GO

Don't Be A Dilbert!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group