Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon May 05, 2025 4:43 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Low or No?!! ...
PostPosted: Sat Jul 06, 2024 4:06 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7802
This photo was taken at EAA Airventure 2018. Does this seem a bit low to start retracting the landing gear? As can be seen, the gear is already half way up.
Nothing negative, just wondering what others think.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Low or No?!! ...
PostPosted: Sat Jul 06, 2024 7:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:12 am
Posts: 310
Well... He's airborne and not using them anymore! Might as well put them away?

C2j


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Low or No?!! ...
PostPosted: Sat Jul 06, 2024 8:47 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3245
Location: New York
Premature retraction. At my age, I can relate.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Low or No?!! ...
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2024 3:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2020 2:36 am
Posts: 399
Location: 5nm W of Biggin Hill
As long as he didn't sink the way I once saw a T-6 drop after pulling in the gear up early on a grass airfield - the rear seater was a certain Sir Richard Branson, so had an unintended gear up landing been the case, it most certainly would have made the press! No damage done but had the grass been in need of a trim you'd probably have mowing evidence on the prop blades.

Don't know what it was about White Waltham - the only other time I visited that airfield, a British Airways VC-10 also got spectacularly low during several passes - a number of images can be seen on Jelle Hieminga's superb VC-10 website: https://www.vc10.net/Memories/WhiteWaltham.html


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Low or No?!! ...
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2024 6:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 8:45 am
Posts: 518
If he went straight into demonstration aerobatics from the take off then retracting the gear that early makes sense.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Low or No?!! ...
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2024 3:24 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 2:29 pm
Posts: 4525
Location: Dallas, TX
It very much depends on the length of the runway and what's on the end you're approaching. Sometimes you'd get stopped faster in a belly landing than with the wheels down. Having survived an unavoidable belly landing due to blown hydraulics, my view on getting the gear up has changed somewhat.

_________________
Aerial Photographer with Red Wing Aerial Photography currently based at KRBD and tailwheel CFI.
Websites: Texas Tailwheel Flight Training, DoolittleRaid.com and Lbirds.com.

The horse is prepared against the day of battle: but safety is of the LORD. - Prov. 21:31 - Train, Practice, Trust.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Low or No?!! ...
PostPosted: Sun Jul 07, 2024 4:40 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5595
Location: Eastern Washington
What does the manual say?

For fun, I checked my P-40 and P-47 pilot handbooks (both original and given to me by a friend who flew 47Ns postwar).

The P-40 says to raise the gear "...when a wheels down landing cannot be done on the remaining runway".

The Thunderbolt book just say to raise the gear "... when definitely airborne".
This Mustang is definitely airborne.

Of course some pilots have the attitude...
"We don't need no stinkin' manuals" (with apologies to John Houston's "The Treasure of the Sierra Madre").

Still, with the cost of a Merlin overhaul, new prop and radiator being what they are, I wouldn't have done that without a very good reason (which this pilot may of had).

I won't second guess him since he has more time in a Mustang than I do. :D

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Low or No?!! ...
PostPosted: Mon Jul 08, 2024 5:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 3:13 pm
Posts: 427
Apart from what the manuals say, any consensus on when to retract the undercarriage can be difficult to achieve. Retracting when you are no longer able to carry out a landing on the runway ahead of you is one useful piece of advice. The other one is to retract it when you have a positive rate of climb. Then of course you may have a max gear extended speed that you want to stay below.

All this is irrelevant when you have a pilot who just wants to demonstrate how pretty the aeroplane looks when low down with the gear up 8)

_________________
A Little VC10derness - A Tribute to the Vickers VC10 - www.VC10.net


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Low or No?!! ...
PostPosted: Tue Jul 09, 2024 4:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:12 am
Posts: 310
Sometimes it has to do with performance...

Attachment:
Gear up.jpg
Gear up.jpg [ 213.56 KiB | Viewed 2349 times ]


C2j


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], raconnel, Vital Spark and 297 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group