Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Jun 07, 2025 3:56 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 7:48 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7812
An RAAF Gloster Meteor with an "X-1' looking thing at Woomera Rocket Range I'm assuming in the late 40's.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAAF_Woom ... ge_Complex

Image

Image

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 8:17 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 3:01 pm
Posts: 145
Location: N Yorkshire
It's an Australian GAF Pika, one of 2 manned development aircraft to test systems and aerodynamics for the Jindivik target drone. According to Wiki, it first flew in I950, and one is preserved in the RAAF Museum. Think I'd prefer the Meteor myself...

First post by the way, been lurking for years though. Hi everybody :drink3:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 9:38 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1175
Location: Marietta, GA
How dodgy would it have been to fly a taildragger jet with no prop blast to add rudder authority?

Yikes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 06, 2020 10:41 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 9:56 am
Posts: 1545
Location: Brush Prairie, WA, USA
that's not that bigger then the Bede 5 :lol:, but probably better airplane, :( that i gave Jim my 5$ :cry:

_________________
GOOD MORNING, WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Press "1" for English.
Press "2" to disconnect until you have learned to speak English.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 12:02 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 12:27 am
Posts: 5607
Location: Eastern Washington
Being a jet taildragger it naturally reminds me of the Supermarine Attacker...
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supermarine_Attacker

If course the Attacker was much larger, as you would expect from an operational type.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 5:41 am 
Offline
KiwiZac
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2008 12:33 am
Posts: 1463
Location: Blenheim, NZ
And here I was, looking forward to a thread on the CAC CA-11 Woomera!

_________________
Zac in NZ
#avgeek, modelbuilder, photographer, writer. Callsign: "HANDBAG".
https://linktr.ee/zacyates

"It's his plane, he spent the money to restore it, he can do with it what he wants. I will never understand what's hard to comprehend about this." - kalamazookid, 20/08/2013
"The more time you spend around warbirds the sooner you learn nothing, is simple." - JohnB, 24/02/22


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 10:05 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:18 pm
Posts: 2048
Location: Meriden,Ct.
Paul Stroud wrote:
It's an Australian GAF Pika, one of 2 manned development aircraft to test systems and aerodynamics for the Jindivik target drone. According to Wiki, it first flew in I950, and one is preserved in the RAAF Museum. Think I'd prefer the Meteor myself...

First post by the way, been lurking for years though. Hi everybody :drink3:


Welcome aboard... :drinkers:

Phil

_________________
A man's got to know his limitations.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 10:34 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 14, 2006 7:18 pm
Posts: 2048
Location: Meriden,Ct.
Kyleb wrote:
How dodgy would it have been to fly a taildragger jet with no prop blast to add rudder authority?

Yikes.


I believe the M262 started out as a taildragger.

Phil

_________________
A man's got to know his limitations.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 11:46 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2007 7:43 pm
Posts: 1175
Location: Marietta, GA
phil65 wrote:
Kyleb wrote:
How dodgy would it have been to fly a taildragger jet with no prop blast to add rudder authority?

Yikes.


I believe the M262 started out as a taildragger.

Phil


No doubt. Imagine the difficulty of spooling those 2 engines up evenly to stay on the runway!


Last edited by Kyleb on Mon Dec 07, 2020 7:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 07, 2020 1:07 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Kyleb wrote:
How dodgy would it have been to fly a taildragger jet with no prop blast to add rudder authority?

Yikes.
Not to mention the bane of airport managers everywhere when the asphalt gets melted.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 5:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 144
Location: Salisbury Plain England
Yikes.[/quote]Not to mention the bane of airport managers everywhere when the asphalt gets melted.[/quote]

The aforementioned Supermarine Attackers were assembled and test flown from High Post airfield near Salisbury which only ever had grass runways. There was a hell of a lot of scorched grass on the runway.

BTW the largest aircraft to land at High Post was this B-36.
Attachment:
B36Boscombe.jpg



Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 5:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 3:13 pm
Posts: 433
Was that a landing or just an 'arrival'?

_________________
A Little VC10derness - A Tribute to the Vickers VC10 - www.VC10.net


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 08, 2020 12:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 144
Location: Salisbury Plain England
Archer wrote:
Was that a landing or just an 'arrival'?

Well it touched down on the (fortunately frozen) grass of High Post airfield but having crossed the Salisbury to Amesbury road it stopped just short of the boundary fence of Boscombe Down airfield, whose curving approach lights the B-36 crew had been following in the fog. The 'arrival' was close enough to a landing to allow the aircraft to be towed through the (removed) fence on to Boscombe Down's runway from where few days later it flew back home from.
To this day the bend in the road you can see is known as 'Low flying corner'


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 8:37 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:11 am
Posts: 2391
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Quote:
I believe the M262 started out as a taildragger.

Phil


Yup!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uj1HeF17ts8

https://www.military.com/video/operations-and-strategy/second-world-war/rare-ww2-german-me-262-take-off/2781572238001


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 09, 2020 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 3:13 pm
Posts: 433
Thanks Aeronut! Sounds like the crew had some memorable moments there.

_________________
A Little VC10derness - A Tribute to the Vickers VC10 - www.VC10.net


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 265 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group