Warbird Information Exchange

Tu-4 (Russian B-29 variants)

In the realms of unknown......I am impressed by how many variations were tried out and tested!!!!

First the original which I hope one day a book will be written on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-4

Now have a look at some of these: https://ruslet.webnode.cz/technika/ruska-technika/letecka-technika/a-n-tupolev/tu-4-bull/

Disassembly of the General H. Hap Arnold


Tu-4 with Tu-91 engine / airframe testbed: https://www.britmodeller.com/forums/index.php?/topic/234998856-bull-and-boot-tu-4-bull-with-tu-91-boot-attached-soviet-engine-testbed/


TU-70 passenger variant: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-70




Tu-75 military transport: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-75




Tu-80 long range bomber: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-80



Tu-85 another long range version: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-85





Some cool pics:



Contra rotating and engine test beds:
https://oldmachinepress.com/2015/05/28/dobrynin-m-250-vd-3tk-and-vd-4k-aircraft-engines/

There already is a book on the Tu-4: in the Aerofile series IIRC.

thank you quemerford!!!

Just ordered this one. There are 2 versions but I got the hardcover.

https://www.amazon.com/Tupolev-Tu-4-Soviet-Strategic-Bomber/dp/0764347977

We seem to always see the same photos of the TU-75.
I wonder if there are any more?
I'm surprised they didn't make a variant with the Stratocruiser/C-97 fuselage. Seems like a no-brainer to make a roll-on - roll off transport.
Aldo, more the '85 has a B-50-size vertical stabilizer.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.

Very interesting windows on the Tu-75. May I assume pressurized sections with the round windows, and unpressurised sections with the square windows? I note different natural metal sheens on the different sections often indicating a different type of skin. Were there tunnel(s) between the sections like the B-29/Tu-4?

That copy sure has a long serial number.

Gotta say, this thread is the biggest collection of Bull I've ever seen!

Don't forget the turbo-prop conversions done by the Chinese including at least one AWACS version with dish on top, one of which is preserved at Datangshan.

https://s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/abpi ... -large.jpg

There was a story doing the rounds a few years ago that Beijing had made enquiries with Moscow about whether the Russians had any Tu-4 spares available, prompting lots of speculation about whether the PLAAF still had some in service!

Nice new pic of the Chinese AWACS version LysanderUK! Thank you for sharing.

Must be an interesting story on how the airframe ended up in China and who and how the engines swap was made! Must be worthwhile of a good story also!

Makes me think that the moving ahead of the engines with nacelle extensions must be related to the CG change due to the radar array! Must have been fun to fly!!!!!

Nothing to do with the radar, it was to keep the same CG with turbine engines installed, which are lighter than the radial engines, the B-17F that had the turbines fitted to it did the same thing.

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook

Tks Matt!

So a typical HP to weight ratio is a lot higher on a turbine! Including new tech material props!

Makes a lot of sense!

You see it on almost all piston designs that have been converted to turbines...DC-3s, AG ships, Otters, Bonanzas...

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.