Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed Jun 18, 2025 2:05 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2020 2:51 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7815
Type 407 and Type 421 Wellington Mark V
Second and first prototypes respectively: three were built, designed for pressurized, high-altitude operations using turbocharged Hercules VIII engines.
Wellington Mark VI
One Wellington Mark V with Merlin 60-series engines, high-altitude prototype only.

In response to Operational Requirement OR.94 calling for a bomber capable of operating at a cruising height of 35,000 feet over 2,200 miles, Vickers proposed the Mk.V and Mk.VI variants of the Wellington, around which Specifications B.23/39 and B.17/40 were written. The aircraft were fitted with a pressurised cabin in the forward fuselage and ultimately a 12 feet increase in wingspan. The two variants differed mainly in their powerplants, with the Mk.V having the Hercules Mk.VIII and the Mk.VI the Merlin 60; prototypes of both were built at Vickers’ Experimental Section site at Foxwarren, Cobham, a few miles from Weybridge. They first flew in 1940 and 1941 respectively, but a change in air staff policy led to second thoughts about the value of high-flying bombers and consequently only the Mk.VI was ordered into limited production, with sixty-four being built at Weybridge between May 1942 and January 1943 and assembled at Smith’s Lawn temporary airfield in Windsor Great Park. Testing at A&AEE Boscombe Down commenced with W5795 but on 12 July 1942 the aircraft dived at high speed from altitude, breaking up before it reached the ground, with the loss of Sqn Ldr Cyril Colmore and his crew. The probable cause was the failure of a propeller blade which penetrated the pressure cabin and hit the pilot. In December 1942, a production Mk.VI DR484 was used to demonstrate its true performance and included a cruising altitude of 34,000 feet (which the aircraft took fifty minutes to reach), an estimated range of 1,100 miles, and a height over the target of 37,100 feet.

The aircraft was operated by a crew of four; pilot, navigator, bomb aimer and wireless operator, all housed in the forward pressure cabin. The need for air gunners was removed as the turrets were to be operated remotely from the cabin and sighted via a periscope. In the event the only service use was with one flight of 109 Squadron which received four aircraft (W5801, W5802, DR480, DR484) as GEE trainers and for Oboe trials in concert with Mk.ICs T2513 and X9678 of the Telecommunications Flying Unit (TFU) Defford, Worcestershire with trials also being flown from Tempsford. The remainder of the Mk.VI fleet was struck off charge and scrapped between March 1943 and August 1944.

A Mk.VI DR480 was to be have been fitted with a British Thomson-Houston built W.2B jet engine in November 1942, but these trials were delayed until 26 January 1943 and the aircraft was re-allocated for use at TFU Defford without being converted

Type 407 and Type 421 Wellington Mark V were the second and first prototypes respectively: three were built, designed for pressurised, high-altitude operations using turbocharged Hercules VIII engines.

Wellington Mark VI

The Mk VI was developed at the same time as the Mk V, but using Rolls Royce Merlin 60 engines, providing 1,600 hp. These proved more successful than the Hercules III engines used in the Mk V, but high-altitude flight provided problems of its own, as many of the liquids used in the aircraft froze in the extreme cold. Sixty four Mk VIs were produced, and it was intended to use them with pathfinder squadrons to mark targets for the main bomber force, but by the time the Mk VI was ready for service the Mosquito had appeared, and was very obviously better suited to the role. The Mark VIs never saw combat, though two were flown by a service squadron for a short time, presumably as operational evaluation. Most of the Mark VI bombers were converted to “Wellington Mark VIG” trainers for the Gee radio precision bombing system. The surviving Mk VIs were scrapping in 1943.

Mk.V Type 407, 421, 426, 436, 440, 443 – 3 built

Hercules III 1,425 hp. High-altitude bomber to operate up to 40,000 ft. Prototypes R3298 & R3299 first flown August 1940. One further aircraft W5766. Type 443 one aircraft for Hercules VIII tests

Mk.VI Type 431, 439, 442, 443, 449 – 64 built

Wing span 86 ft 2 in length 61 ft 9 in height 17 ft 8 in, gross weight 30,450 lb, service ceiling 38,500 ft, range 2,275 miles with 1,500 lb bomb load. Merlin 60 1,600 hp. High-altitude bomber. Prototype W5795 plus 63 production aircraft, some used as GEE trainers by one flight of 109 Squadron which received 4 aircraft.

https://weaponsandwarfare.com/2019/03/1 ... -variants/

Image
Vickers Wellington V first prototype, R3298. A pressurised high-altitude bomber

Image

Image

Image

Image

_________________
Zero Surprise!!...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2020 6:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 2:01 pm
Posts: 271
Another great thread on another British oddball, amazing how far you can go with a fabric covered design and a structure designed for airships.

It would be interesting to know where these pictures were taken, the prototype Lancaster and a very early Stirling can be seen in the background of one shot and a Westland Whirlwind fighter in another.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2020 6:23 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7815
That would be Boscombe Down I believe. (Spelling)

_________________
Zero Surprise!!...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2020 3:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2008 4:00 pm
Posts: 144
Location: Salisbury Plain England
Having spent 30 years at Boscombe Down, I spend more time looking at the background of these photos trying to work out where on the airfield they were taken. At the time of these Wellington photos the airfield was still all grass, but the laying of concrete runways and then major landscaping to accommodate Hardened Aircraft Shelters in the 1970's have changed the look of the airfield. The hills outside the wire on the other hand have (mostly) remained unchanged since the days when the locals were building Stonehenge.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2020 4:01 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 4:19 pm
Posts: 1594
These look to have been taken over by the 'tower' side, near to where the solar farm is now. Some of those trees are still there!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2020 5:21 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 2:01 pm
Posts: 271
Many thanks, I was thinking Boscombe but couldn't be sure.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2020 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:06 am
Posts: 871
Location: Midland, Texas
One of the last operational/test duties of the Wellington, were two hybrids (W5389 and W5518) with Merlin 62 engines, a Mk II fuselage, Mk VI wings and a Whittle turbojet engine in the tail. "Between 1944 and 1945 at least 15 types of jet engines were evaluated in these high-flying test-bed Wellingtons, and a total of 512 hours was completed in 366 separate flights." Quote and image from pages 362-363, "Vickers Aircraft since 1908" by C. F. Andrews and E. B. Morgan, 1989. Just FYI. Randy


Attachments:
Hybrid Wellington.jpg
Hybrid Wellington.jpg [ 117.99 KiB | Viewed 2755 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 17, 2020 5:09 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7815
Image

_________________
Zero Surprise!!...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 18, 2020 4:54 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
not a lot of jet-powered airplanes in history with fabric covering I suspect. Maybe just the Vampire/Venom series?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2020 6:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:20 pm
Posts: 368
Location: UK
The high altitude Wellington has always baffled me. If they were going to design a pressurised aircraft, what had they been taking to make them think a Wellington was a good starting point?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2020 9:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 11:44 pm
Posts: 255
dhfan wrote:
The high altitude Wellington has always baffled me. If they were going to design a pressurised aircraft, what had they been taking to make them think a Wellington was a good starting point?

Something to do with the geodesic fuselage construct? Or maybe it was just laying around and somebody "Hey, we're not doing anything with that."


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2020 10:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 3:13 pm
Posts: 433
The geodetic construction was easy to modify, and in my view they were not looking for a pressurised aircraft (which would necessitate a new design) but an aircraft with a pressurised crew cabin.
From C.F. Andrews' "Vickers Aircraft since 1908" :
Quote:
In the autumn of 1938 the Air Staff requested Vickers to investigate the possibilities of using the Wellington as a high-altitude bomber to operate at 35,000 ft with a maximum ceiling of 40,000 ft, using a pressurised cabin. This meant marrying a pressure vessel to the geodetic airframe, which was theoretically a contradiction in terms. However, it was carried out most successfully, the cabin being attached by means of integral feet anchored to the nodal point of the geodetic structure. This scheme allowed the cabin to expand and contract independently of the rest of the structure.

_________________
A Little VC10derness - A Tribute to the Vickers VC10 - www.VC10.net


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 25, 2020 10:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 10:06 am
Posts: 871
Location: Midland, Texas
Archer, I was just about to post the same info from that source. Here is an image from the same page of the pressure cabin structure.

Randy


Attachments:
Wellington pressure cabin.jpg
Wellington pressure cabin.jpg [ 167.19 KiB | Viewed 2186 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 29, 2020 3:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 3:13 pm
Posts: 433
These photos aren't all that exciting to look at, but these are some of the remains of the Vickers Experimental Works at Foxwarren, Cobham, where the first high-altitude Wellingtons were built. Later, this venue was also used to build the Viking, Valiant and Vickers 1000 prototypes. There was no runway here, aircraft left the site disassembled and were moved to Wisley for test flying.


Attachments:
Foxwarren.jpg
Foxwarren.jpg [ 331.79 KiB | Viewed 2055 times ]
Foxwarren2.jpg
Foxwarren2.jpg [ 367.75 KiB | Viewed 2055 times ]

_________________
A Little VC10derness - A Tribute to the Vickers VC10 - www.VC10.net
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jun 09, 2020 5:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 01, 2015 9:18 am
Posts: 20
They flew a Dart turboprop testbed Wellington in 1948 Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ErrolC, Google [Bot], kalamazookid and 261 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group