Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 6:13 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 12:33 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7822
Grumman J4F-2 Widgeon "Petulant Porpoise" c/n 1330 BuNo 32976, which now is on static display at the Pima Air & Space Museum.

"This Widgeon was built by Grumman in Bethpage, NY and was accepted by the Navy on September 20, 1943. It served with support squadrons in Seattle, Washington and Memphis, Tennessee until 1948 when it was turned over to the Edo Corporation to be modified for testing of new seaplane hull designs. Modifications included a new landing gear design that retracts up along side the fuselage rather than into it. Painted yellow, redesignated E-175 and given the name “Petulant Porpoise” it was assigned to the National Advisory Committee on Aeronautics (NACA) and based at Langley Field, Virginia. The first hull shape tested was a half scale replica of the Martin XP5M-1. Over the next five years the aircraft was used to test other experimental hull designs."
https://pimaair.org/visit/museum-aircra ... man/j4f-2/

Specifications:
Wingspan 40 ft
Length 31 ft 1 in
Height 11 ft 5 in
Weight 4,525 lbs (loaded)
Max. Speed 153 mph
Service Ceiling 14,600 ft
Range 800 miles
Engines 2 Ranger L-440-5, 200 hp
Crew 2 and 4 passengers

Image
Washington DC May 1956.

Image
Currently on static display at the Pima Air & Space Museum.

_________________
Zero Surprise!!...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 12:58 pm 
Offline
WRG Editor
WRG Editor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 5614
Location: Somerset, MA & Johnston, RI
Obviously at some point they shortened the nose, I wonder why? I like the look of the longer nose but I can imagine it would be a bit of an issue breaking waves.

_________________
Scott Rose
Editor-In-Chief/Webmaster
Warbirds Resource Group - Warbird Information Exchange - Warbird Registry

Be civil, be polite, be nice.... or be elsewhere.
-------------------------------------------------------
This site is brought to you with the support of members like you. If you find this site to be of value to you,
consider supporting this forum and the Warbirds Resource Group with a VOLUNTARY subscription
For as little as $2/month you can help ($2 x 12 = $24/year, less than most magazine subscriptions)
So If you like it here, and want to see it grow, consider helping out.


Image

Thanks to everyone who has so generously supported the site. We really do appreciate it.

Follow us on Twitter! @WIXHQ


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 1:48 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:31 pm
Posts: 1123
Location: Caribou, Maine
The "Petulent Porposies" was originally designed to test hull shapes, and I assume this would have extended to hulls. So what is now on the Pima specimen is the last tested design.

The plane was once part of the NASM collection, stored outside for many years, and then traded (along with the F8F prototype) to Darryl Greenamyer for the F8F-2 Conquest speed-record holder.

_________________
Kevin McCartney


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 3:28 pm 
Offline
WRG Editor
WRG Editor
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 4:43 pm
Posts: 5614
Location: Somerset, MA & Johnston, RI
old iron wrote:
The "Petulent Porposies" was originally designed to test hull shapes, and I assume this would have extended to hulls. So what is now on the Pima specimen is the last tested design.

The plane was once part of the NASM collection, stored outside for many years, and then traded (along with the F8F prototype) to Darryl Greenamyer for the F8F-2 Conquest speed-record holder.


Cool, didn't realize it was a test bed, just thought it was experimental. Thanks for the clarification

_________________
Scott Rose
Editor-In-Chief/Webmaster
Warbirds Resource Group - Warbird Information Exchange - Warbird Registry

Be civil, be polite, be nice.... or be elsewhere.
-------------------------------------------------------
This site is brought to you with the support of members like you. If you find this site to be of value to you,
consider supporting this forum and the Warbirds Resource Group with a VOLUNTARY subscription
For as little as $2/month you can help ($2 x 12 = $24/year, less than most magazine subscriptions)
So If you like it here, and want to see it grow, consider helping out.


Image

Thanks to everyone who has so generously supported the site. We really do appreciate it.

Follow us on Twitter! @WIXHQ


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 3:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 1:42 am
Posts: 546
There were at least five different hulls that were tested on the Widgeon. We have three of them. Two of them are on display. One on the plane and one sitting along the wall behind it. We didn't have room to put the third one out. None of them are the long nosed one that shows up in most of the historical photos. If you look closely at the photo you can see the bazillion bolts that hold the top and bottom halves of the plane together.

James


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 26, 2019 6:37 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:40 pm
Posts: 1471
Seen the old girl many times but never noticed, until today, the very non-standard "star and bar" insignia. Interesting stuff.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 27, 2019 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 2:20 pm
Posts: 149
Interesting. I was at Pima a year or so ago, and saw this plane. Obviously didn't do a good job looking at it to understand its R&D history.

Looks like in the old photo with the longer nose/hull, there were additional "vertical stabilizers" on the horizontal. No surprise really since the longer nose would be directionally destabilizing, thus requiring additional vertical stab to aid in flying qualities/handling.

_________________
Greenville Flyers: The Legacy of Allied Pilots Who Flew at Greenville Army Airfield


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 5:18 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 8:41 pm
Posts: 1469
Location: North Texas
Found a photo of her in the Ginter PBM book this afternoon. Sitting next to the XP5M-1/M-270 reasearch bird.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 30, 2019 3:01 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4701
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
We got the Then & Now - here's the in-between, from the March 3, 1978 issue of Trade-A-Plane; note it's wearing the test hull for the Martin XP5M-1:
Attachment:
Grumman Widgeon Petulant Porpoise - 3-3-78.jpg
Grumman Widgeon Petulant Porpoise - 3-3-78.jpg [ 469.72 KiB | Viewed 1032 times ]

From Leon Cleaver's (Woodsy Airfield) scrapbook.

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: JohnB and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group