bdk wrote:http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/systems/b-52d.htm
"AF33(600)-" is a prefix for the B-52D contract.
Looks like the contracts cited also included the E version, according to the linked reference:
"The aircraft were ordered under 4 separate contracts. The first, AF33(600)-28223, finalized on 31 August 1954, covered 50 aircraft; the second, AF33(600)-31267, signed on 26 October 1955, involved 51 B-52Ds
and 26 B-52Es-the next model in the series. Like preceding B-52s, the new planes were to be built at the Boeing Seattle plant. The other 2 contracts, AF33(600)-26235 and AF33(600)-31155, finalized on 29 November 1954 and 31 January 1956 respectively, totaled 69 B-52Ds
and 14 B-52Es-all to come from Boeing's new production facilities in Wichita, Kansas."
BDK, can you (or anyone, perhaps someone from 1950's USAF Procurement?) provide additional insight into the contract numbering system of that era? Specifically, I'd like to determine if the sequencing of the numbers is of significance in confirming that an item was actually ordered as OEM for the aircraft. The contract number on the T-19 module following the above prefix is 15676, which numerically precedes the ones cited above for the B-52D/E.
So either
a) specified OEM contracts were issued in order of the aircraft's production sequence or bill of material, with the final assembled/delivered aircraft as the final (i.e., numerically highest) contract #,
b) the contract for this item was issued for an aircraft preceding the contract cited, or
c) the contract numbering sequence is unrelated and I'm being totally anally-retentive, which is probably true regardless.
I'm still speculating that the drawing number starting with "B52D..." is an interesting clue.....
Still trying to figure out what a T-19 module actually does....