Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jul 07, 2025 7:38 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Dec 28, 2014 11:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2014 10:57 pm
Posts: 4
Location: McKinney, TX
Hi, all!

Can anyone help me out with some Yaquisition questions? I'll take answers, websites or Harrassments. Whatever you've got.

First, my biggest concern is maintenance (both special and routine). Are mechs and parts readily available?

Second, where can folks get some training?

Third, are there any must haves or have nots in the quest for the plane (like the western electrics)?

Fourth, are there any Yak Brokers/Gurus that specialize in Yakquisitions?

Finally, can a case be made for a Warbird of another make/model with better operating costs (and what could that be)? Requirements would still have to be 2-place and at least gentleman aerobatics.

Thanks for all the help!

P.S. If there are any Pitts S-2 guys out there I'd love to pick your brain for some cost of ownership basics as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 11:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 26, 2004 5:15 pm
Posts: 167
Location: Georgetown Tx
PM sent

_________________
"Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 11:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 7:20 am
Posts: 306
beware they need a spar strap if not already done. engines are low tbo, they arnt much faster than a cessna @ 5x the fuel :drink3:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 5:09 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
Look at the Nanchang CJ-6A, very similar to the Yak-52, but it is a military trainer and can do acro.

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 5:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 10:20 am
Posts: 681
Location: Belgium
Matt Gunsch wrote:
Look at the Nanchang CJ-6A, very similar to the Yak-52, but it is a military trainer and can do acro.

I don't undersand your last comment : the Yak-52 can do acro

_________________
Sorry for my bad English:-(


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 5:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 7:20 am
Posts: 306
Iclo wrote:
Matt Gunsch wrote:
Look at the Nanchang CJ-6A, very similar to the Yak-52, but it is a military trainer and can do acro.

I don't undersand your last comment : the Yak-52 can do acro


nanchang is a lot stronger


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 7:53 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
Darth JBell wrote:

Finally, can a case be made for a Warbird of another make/model with better operating costs (and what could that be)? Requirements would still have to be 2-place and at least gentleman aerobatics.
.

Iclo wrote:
Matt Gunsch wrote:
Look at the Nanchang CJ-6A, very similar to the Yak-52, but it is a military trainer and can do acro.

I don't undersand your last comment : the Yak-52 can do acro


I was responding the original posters comment about being aerobatic,

I know the Yak-52 can do acro, I have done several years of maint on one, and flown several CJs.

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Dec 29, 2014 11:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2014 10:57 pm
Posts: 4
Location: McKinney, TX
Thanks for the inputs, guys. Please keep them coming!

Yeah, the Yak 52 won't be super quick. I'd love a T-28 or even a T-33 or L-39 for some more speed and altitude, but I imagine their cost of ownership to be through the roof.

Concerning the CJ in this aspect, isn't it only slightly quicker with the fully retractable gear because of the less powerful engine?

Also, is the maintenance more cost effective than the Yak?

I guess what I'm asking is what would the case be for a CJ over a Yak? Fewer ADs? Lower Cost of ownership? Ease of maintenance (availability of parts and Mechs)?

Sorry for all the rookie questions and thanks again for the help!

- Josh


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:07 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
Dunno, I'd consider a Yak 18T. Performance about halfway between the 52 and CJ-6 with greater range than either, and the possibility of taking either 2 extra people or a fair amount of stuff while retaining the acrobatic performance.
Any one of them and you'll need to invest in a few scuba tanks<G>

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:15 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
If I had my choice, I would go with the CJ, more of them flying than Yak-52s.
Maint is about the same, I just love chasing freekin air leaks..

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 2:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 7:20 am
Posts: 306
agree with shrike, yak-18T is the go, 4 seats, fully aerobatic, 400hp, good for touring, retractable, no major problems


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 9:35 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2005 9:41 am
Posts: 540
Other than getting an hour or so of dual in a Yak-52 about 20 years ago and being around a few transient Yaks of various flavors, I think over the years I have heard talk of various conversions to convert some of the pneumatic systems to hydraulic (brakes and/or ?) and electric (starter). Is that correct? I remember back in the late '80s or early '90s a Su or Yak stopping in on a Sunday afternoon and leaking all of his air. Try finding a high pressure source in my town on a Sunday afternoon! I think we finally tracked down a soda machine vendor with a CO2 tank and rounded up enough fittings to make it work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 2:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2014 10:57 pm
Posts: 4
Location: McKinney, TX
The 18T, huh? Can't say I've even thought of it until ya'll mentioned it. Something else to think about for sure.

Since we're tossing around options, here's my actual airplane mission:
- Aerobatic (at least gentlemanly rolls/loops/Cuban 8s, etc.)
- Something to share with family members (not necessarily all at once)
- Must sound cool and look cool (Warbirds would be great, but a Pitts does this too)

Feel free to chew on it and let me know if I'm off or missing anything.

Also, let me say thanks to the PMs I got. I'm too much of a Newb to be allowed to PM back, but I truly appreciate all the information!

- Josh


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 7:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 07, 2011 5:06 pm
Posts: 16
Location: Kenmore, WA. USA
IAR-823...enough said. :)

True military liaison/armament trainer

IO-540 290hp (can be upgraded to 320hp), 4-place. True underwing hardpoints. Fully aerobatic. Cruise at 145KIAS all day. Built strong like ox (da).

Company very famous (IAR) and still in business, although they do helos now.

IAR823.com

=Bob=


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Dec 30, 2014 9:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 2:48 pm
Posts: 418
Location: Houston, Texas
There is a fairly active Yak/CJ specific forum at:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewforum.php?f=6

There's also a lot of good info on Richard Goode's website:

http://www.russianaeros.com/products/

The Yak-18T would be a great choice, although they are not that common in the US. With any Yak one thing to consider is the amount of fuel they can carry; as built they were really only designed for short aerobatic or general training hops, and thus won't provide the cross-country range you might be used to with your average Cessna. There are a number of additional tank modifications available to increase the range on 52s and 18Ts - some of these are easily retrofittable; some are not.

A CJ-6A re-engined with the M-14P (360hp) or M-14PF (400hp) would also be an excellent choice for an all-round sporty-warbirdy aircraft. A stock CJ-6A with the standard 285 hp engine is a fun ride, but a bit of a dog IMHO compared to a Yak-52.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group