Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed May 07, 2025 9:56 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 9:31 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3245
Location: New York
Most of us know that the B-24 was produced in the greatest numbers of any American military aircraft, and for a long time we thought that the Bf 109 held the global prize, until the 1990s when it became okay to admit that the Soviet Union had done something worthwhile in the war, including producing even more Il-2s than Germany produced 109s.

Sheer numbers, of course, are not the whole story if you are thinking about total production effort. It has occurred to many of us that the B-24's production record is all the more impressive considering that it is a heavy bomber, much larger and more complex than a fighter. But how impressive exactly? One way to get a handle on it is to multiply the number produced by the empty weight for various types to get the total pounds of each type made, reasoning that that is a decent proxy for the amount of human and industrial effort that went into each production program.

When you do this, you find that the B-24, by weight, was easily the most-produced military aircraft of the war, and probably the most-produced aircraft ever. 674 million pounds of them were made.

Less than half that tonnage (348 million pounds) of Il-2s were built, and still fewer Bf 109s (200 million pounds). In fact, the second most produced airplane of the war by weight (of the types that I thought to look up) was the B-17, at 460 million pounds. Even the Lancaster (269 million pounds) and B-29 (296 million pounds) outweighed the Bf 109 programme. Which puts the Allied heavy bomber campaign into perspective. The B-25 is right behind the 109 with 194 million pounds produced.

Still, the 109 edges out the other single-seat fighters. The logical American contender would be the P-47, produced in greater numbers and also heavier than any other U.S. fighter, but it was made to the tune of only 156 million pounds.

I also thought it might be fun to compare more modern aircraft, both military and civilian. Though made in much smaller numbers, the more successful represent a large production effort because of their sheer size. Two of the more conspicuously successful, the Boeing 747 and 737, have been produced to a greater extent (by weight) than any warbird except the B-24 (554 million pounds and 535 million pounds respectively). It's nice to think that society has poured as much resources into these types that form the backbone of air travel and have enriched our lives as some of our more effective weapons. Still, it is all the more amazing that more tons of B-24s were produced in about five years than 747s in 45 years.

Modern military aircraft haven't been produced in such great numbers, but they've gotten bigger and heavier. The C-130 has been produced to about the same tonnage as the immortal C-47. The F-4 phantom turns out to be America's most-produced fighter by weight, edging out the P-47 even though produced in only one-third the numbers.

Here's the table from which I drew these conclusions. The weights have to be taken as approximate, given that most of the aircraft concerned had different variants, often with very different weights.

Aircraft Wt # prod Total Pounds
B-24 36500 18482 674593000
B-747 380000 1458 554040000
B-737 69000 7755 535095000
B-17 36135 12731 460034685
Il-2 9612 36183 347790996
B-29 74500 3970 295765000
Lancaster 36457 7377 268943289
Bf 109 5893 33984 200267712
B-25 19480 9984 194488320
C-47 18135 10000 181350000
C-130 75800 2300 174340000
F-4 30328 5195 157553960
P-47 10000 15660 156600000
Fw 190 7060 20000 141200000
MiG-21 10079 11496 115868184
Spitfire 5090 20351 103586590
P-40 6350 13738 87236300
Hurricane 5743 14553 83577879
F-15 28000 1198 33544000

August


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 9:58 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7802
Now can you calculate how many rivets were used per sq. ft.? ... :wink:

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 6:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 7:25 pm
Posts: 522
Location: Travis AFB
Now look at weight Vs Man Hours

ratios of weight to man-hours for the principal types work out as follows:
By the numbers from the British

Airframe structure weight
Average man-hours
lb. structure weight per 1,000 man-hours
lb. thousands

FIGHTERS

Spitfire
2,055
15.2
135
Hurricane
2,468
10.3
240
Whirlwind
3,461
26.6
130
Tornado
3,600
15.5
233

BOMBERS

Battle
4,466
24
186
Whitley
9,557
52
184
Wellington
10,117
38
266
Manchester
15,650
52.1
300
Halifax
16,157
76
213
Stirling
26,630
75
314

the basic relations between weight and man-hours remained the same during the war, and the heavier aircraft continued to require much less manpower per pound of weight than the lighter ones.

Ref: http://www.ibiblio.org/hyperwar/UN/UK/U ... .html#fn89


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 335 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group