SaxMan wrote:
This seems like some pencil pusher going REALLY overboard with the destruction of military assets to prevent reuse.
That's the nature of any bureaucracy...a "one size fits all" mentaility.
The worker who wrote the salvage bid thinks...."the book says destroy old military aircraft so they can't be used by bad guys...so that's what I do".
Even if it's an impossibility.
In other words, the rule/law doesn't differentiate between a F-14 and a F-102. Probably because the people who wrote the rules don't know the difference, and the person enforcing them doesn't know either. Just doing what the book says. They can't be expected to think critically or know about the subject they're enforcing. They're drones, counting the days until retirement and keeping a eye on their Thrift Savings Plan (a sort of govt 401K) account