Warbird Information Exchange

Check the link to see how the planes will be positioned in the new building at the NMUSAF scheduled to open in 2015. Interesting they are bringing the C-39/DC-2 out of storage for placement the new building. It will be one heck of an addition to the museum campus. http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/shared ... 30-003.jpg

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!

Noticed a small error where they labeled the VC-118 a Lockheed aircraft.

Walt

_________________
If God had intended airplane engines to have horizontally-opposed cylinders, Pratt & Whitney would have built them that way.

It's going to be nice...especially the Presidential gallery for people who can't make itto the Annex.

I remember when it was just one building and everyone thought it great (Though I do miss the chapel display overlooking the WWII/modern side of the building).
And when it was two buildings, we thought it really great. (Back in the 84-85, they had an AF-wide effort to collect money for it from active duty members).
The third building is super...though putting one of the B-1s I used to work with made me feel old).

Now, what can you say? Neat.
It's almost tempting enough to move back to the Dayton area..

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.

Which columbine aircraft is that? I can't make out the roman numerals. Is that columbine II which is parked outin the desert currently rotting away? I had heard they were gonna try and get it, but have they actually taken ownership yet?

Edit: never mind, Columbine III has been at the NMUSAF for a while now, though I don't remember seeing it when I was there in 2007. Maybe I just didn't tour that area.

Sorry to get sort of off topic, But now I'm a little confused. I know Columbine II is privately owned and was stripped partly, but what complete aircraft does Pima have that has columbine painted on it? As I thought their was only two columbine aircraft, Pima ( which I thought was III) and II.

_________________
Tyler Pinkerton
Active Member of Air Heritage Inc. of Beaver Falls, PA.
Aircraft: C47B, C-123K, Fairchild F-24, Funk Model B, L-21B, T-28B, T-34B
Static: F-4C Phantom II, F-15A, T-3 Provost

Columbine III has been at NMUSAF since at least my first visit in 1978, but she's always been in the "Annex" hangar on the other side of the field from the main museum along with the rest of the Presidential aircraft.

Here's a pic of the Columbine at Pima I took in 2004. There's no Roman numeral after the name, so I assume it's the first.



SN

Does anyone know if a specific C-5 Galaxy has been picked for display yet? Hopefully a Vietnam, Isreali lift, Gulf war I and II vet. I vote for a paint job in the early delivery C-5A scheme of gray and white- best looking by far. Current gray is a boring and Euro One cammo was ugly. I assume the C-141C is the Hanoi Taxi. Love the trash haulers!

Must have thought V stood for Vega.

_________________

All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)

I would guess most are.I agree about your paint comments.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.
Note political free signature.
I figure if you wanted my opinion on items unrelated to this forum, you'd ask for it.

Is Sequestration going to delay the opening of this? Or is it all private money going to it?

Where are they going to put the C-17 that they got last year?

Know what you mean. At least the C-141 is gray & white. I'd still rather see the C-5 land, get pickled, and brought inside asap just as she is, dings and all. I was told that today's gray was made so as to be environmentally friendly - as such, it weathers fast and becomes chalky sitting outside, it wouldn't look good if the C-5 gets stuck out for too long.

Ken

_________________
"Take care of the little things and the big things will take care of themselves."

The new building is being built entirely with funds raised by the Air Force Museum Foundation. Sequestration should not have any effect on the construction of the new building. It looks like the C-17 will be left outside for now. I'm sure once the new building is up and is open to the public, the foundation will start fund raising for yet another building to house the C-17, the Swoose and all the experimental aircraft. I hope I live long enough top see that!

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!

_________________
Ain't no sunshine when she's gone!

Does anyone know if there will be elevated viewing platforms in this building. It sure gives a different perspective on the aircraft when you look down on them. By the way what does the LN stand for?

Learning Node:
http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/shared ... 30-002.jpg
http://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/shared ... 47-001.jpg

hopefully the usaf museum will cherry pick some of the aircraft slated for removal from the downsizing of the warner robbins museum in Georgia. how does 1 museum downsize while another grows?? it's like talking out of both sides of your mouth. I thought this sequestration / castration was across the board. I realize the usaf museum is oz for all of us, but come on!! the Georgia museum was certainly not a truckstop!!

_________________
tom d. friedman - hey!!! those fokkers were messerschmitts!! * without ammunition, the usaf would be just another flying club!!! * better to have piece of mind than piece of tail!!