Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue May 13, 2025 10:40 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 3:13 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7802
All I could think of were a few of these. Most of us know what they were and how, for the most part, most of these proposals and ideas didn't quite work out.

Image
The XB-41 project was developed to test the escort bomber concept. Because there were no fighters capable of escorting bomber formations on deep strike missions early in World War II, the Air Corps authorized tests for heavily armed bombers to act as escorts and protect the bomb-carrying aircraft from enemy fighters. Both the XB-40 and XB-41 projects were failures for a variety of reasons -- they were unable to effectively defend other aircraft, the were too slow to keep up with formations returning from bombing missions, they were too heavy, and the basic flight characteristics were changed drastically by the added drag and center of gravity changes introduced with the additional turrets.

Image
The XB-41 was modified from an early production model B-24D (S/N 41-11822) and included 14 .50-cal. machine guns mounted in pairs in a Bendix chin turret, two Martin power turrets on the dorsal (top) fuselage, a belly turret, left and right waist positions, and a tail turret. The XB-41 was completed in late 1942 and testing was done in early 1943. Flight tests were very disappointing and the XB-41 project was quickly canceled.

Image
B-24 Liberator (serial number 42-7580) nicknamed "Hap Hazard" of the 445th Bomb Group with a modified nose

Image
The XB-40 was developed to test the bomber escort concept. Early in World War II, before long-range fighters like the P-51D became available, the Air Corps developed plans to modify bombers with additional defensive armament. These aircraft would accompany regular bomber formations and provide protection from attacking fighters. Unfortunately, the modified escort bombers were not maneuverable enough to protect large formations. They were also excessively tail heavy and overweight. A standard B-17F formation returning from a mission (after bomb release) outpaced the escort bombers. The YB-40 participated in only a few operational missions in mid-1943 before being withdrawn from service.

Image
The prototype XB-40 was modified by Lockheed Vega (Project V-139) by converting the second production B-17F-1-BO (S/N 41-24341). Defensive armament consisted of 14 .50-cal. machine guns in seven gun positions: chin turret, two dorsal turrets, ball turret, two waist positions and the tail. The first flight of the XB-40 was on Nov. 10, 1942. Twenty service test aircraft were ordered (Vega Project V-140) as YB-40 along with four crew trainers designated TB-40. Because Vega had higher priority production projects, the YB-40/TB-40 assembly job was transferred to Douglas.

Image
In the spring of 1943, the 327th Bomb Squadron of the 92nd Bomb Group, RAF Alconbury, was assigned 12 YB-40s for operational combat tests. The first mission was flown on May 29, 1943, and after less than 10 missions the aircraft were withdrawn from service. Most were converted back to the standard B-17F configuration.

Image
The chin turret installation pioneered on the B-40 series aircraft was soon adopted for late model B-17Fs and became standard equipment on the B-17G.

Image

Image

Image
Photo states: Boeing B-17E Flying Fortress 41-9112 "The Dreamboat" gunship tail

Image
Photo states: Boeing B-17E Flying Fortress 41-9112 "The Dreamboat" gunship tail

Image
A very modified and heavily armed B-26

Image
Well armed B-25 with the 13th AF New Caledonia July 20, 1943

Image
B-25 with the 13th AF New Caledonia July 20, 1943

Image
One of Pappy Gunn's guns? I believe 390th BS 42nd BG B-25D

Image
B-25 with the 490th Bomb Squadron 341st Bomb Group

Image
B-25H with the 13th AF

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 4:41 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7802
More 'guns' ...

Image
Installation Of Six 50 Cal. Machine Guns In The Nose Of A North American B-25 Of The 490Th Bomb Group, 341St Bomb Group, China

Image
The weird Consolidated XB-24J

Image
Consolidated XB-24J

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 4:48 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7802
One of the coolest looking B-25's. The 'H' model.

Image
North American B-25H-5-NA (SN 43-4448) with K-24 12-inch forward shooting camera installation (above the nose .50-cal. machine guns). (U.S. Air Force photo)

Image
B-25H full frontal view

Image
B-25H factory photo

Image
B-25H factory photo

Image
North American B-25H takeoff. (U.S. Air Force photo)

Image
North American B-25H-1-NA (SN 43-4110, the 6th production H model). (U.S. Air Force photo)

Image
A nice color shot of a PBJ-1H

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:29 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7802
For no other reason than their just very cool ...

Image
A test P-47 Thunderbolt (serial nuimber 44-88335) with 'Zero Rail' rocket installation fitted to the wings.

Image
A test P-47 Thunderbolt (serial nuimber 44-88335) with 'Zero Rail' rocket installation fitted to the wings.

Image
A test P-47 Thunderbolt (serial nuimber 44-88335) with 'Zero Rail' rocket installation fitted to the wings.

Image
A test P-47 Thunderbolt (serial nuimber 44-88335) with 'Zero Rail' rocket installation fitted to the wings.

Image
Republic F-84E loaded with various type rockets.

Image
Republic F-84E loaded with various type rockets.

Image
Republic F-84E loaded with various type rockets.

Image
Republic F-84E loaded with various type rockets.

Image
Republic F-84E loaded with various type rockets.

Image
A P-47 Thunderbolt of the 78th Fighter Group fitted with a 20mm cannon, 24 October 1944.

Image
A P-47 Thunderbolt of the 78th Fighter Group during a machine gun test, July 1943.

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 5:31 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7802
And even more cool ...

Image
Boeing B-17G Flying Fortress With Glide Bombs

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2015 6:44 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 4:08 pm
Posts: 63
Location: Left Coast
Thank you for the great photos. What must it have been like on the flight deck of a B-25 with six .50s blazing away in the nose?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2015 6:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:07 am
Posts: 282
Location: Grosse Pointe, Michigan
Mark Allen M wrote:
And even more cool ...

Image
Boeing B-17G Flying Fortress With Glide Bombs


Great stuff as usual, Mark - thanks! A couple of adds to this one:

Aircraft is Boeing-built 43-38498, equipped with external bomb racks as factory standard. The GBU-10 guided bombs were developed by Douglas; however, Douglas B-17s were not being equipped with external racks so a Boeing-built aircraft was assigned to the GBU test program. After tests were completed she was used for aircrew training. During a navigation training flight from Memphis, Tenn. to Wichita, Kans. on 21 Oct. 46 the number 3 engine suffered a runaway prop and subsequent fire which resulted in an emergency landing at Chanute, Kansas Municipal Airport (which only had a 2,200-foot runway). There wasn't sufficient fire-fighting equipment immediately available to knock down the fire and she was a total loss.

_________________
Daviemax
Researcher of Post-War B-17 History
Maintains database of B-17s used from 46- on.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2015 9:29 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:00 pm
Posts: 2147
Location: Utah
Great stuff Mark! I wonder how well that F-84 flew with the heavy rocket loadout.

Tom P.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2015 11:57 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:11 pm
Posts: 1917
Location: Pacific Northwest USA, via North Florida
Sometime in the early 90s at a display my group set up, I talked with a WW2 vet who swore he helped put a quad-50 mount from a halftrack into a B-24, into the waist gunner station area. This was somewhere in the PTO but sadly I didn't get too many details other than that as I was leaving the event I was at when I talked with him.
I think one might be able to fit in there if you did a lot of work to the plane and the mount, but I don't see where the use would be for all that work.
Also, I've never been able to find any reference to this anywhere.

_________________
Life member, 91st BG Memorial Association
Owner, 1944 Willys MB #366014
Former REMF (US Army, O3)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2015 12:43 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2010 12:51 pm
Posts: 1185
Location: Chandler, AZ
p51 wrote:
Sometime in the early 90s at a display my group set up, I talked with a WW2 vet who swore he helped put a quad-50 mount from a halftrack into a B-24, into the waist gunner station area. This was somewhere in the PTO but sadly I didn't get too many details other than that as I was leaving the event I was at when I talked with him.
I think one might be able to fit in there if you did a lot of work to the plane and the mount, but I don't see where the use would be for all that work.
Also, I've never been able to find any reference to this anywhere.


It would give you some decent firepower for low level oblique strafing. Think pre-Spooky.
Exchanged for the ball turret and associated retraction equipment the weight is pretty much a wash - especially if you used a/c power instead of the Briggs and Stratton generator

_________________
Lest Hero-worship raise it's head and cloud our vision, remember that World War II was fought and won by the same sort of twenty-something punks we wouldn't let our daughters date.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 04, 2015 10:41 pm 
Offline
Aerial Pirate
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2004 11:46 pm
Posts: 2002
Location: South San Francisco, CA (next to SFO Airport)
Awesome set Mark, thanks for posting.

_________________
Roger Cain
www.sfahistory.org
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Stearman/


We must limit politicians to two terms:
one in office and one in jail.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 272 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group