shrike wrote:
The older date is when the pattern was made, the newer date is the casting date. Even Continental found this confusing, and discontinued the practice.
TCM no longer supports the A-series engine, and keeps no data therefor. They have done this with a number of newer engine series as well, which can make dealing with them even more frustrating that usual.
The data plate would have been their regular commercial plate, which has a slot for customer serial number, in this case USAAF.They don't survive stripping, so lots of them are just blank pieces of metal with a serial number stamped in the corner. It wasn't until the 60's that TCM consistently used a plate with all of the information stamped or engraved.
Blank plates are still available NOS - pm me.
Thank you for that information, Continental was probably still manufacturing a few civilian engines in early 1942, would they have used the same steel plate as the military engine or the aluminum plate found on many pre-war engines. Were the plates hand or machine stamped and what font was used. Which designation was on the plate A-65 or O-170 and did the plate have the contract order number on it like some of the Lycoming plates. Did they use both the AAF serial number and the continental number or just the Continental #. We need all of that specific information in order to restore the current plate or fabricate an exact replica with FAA authorization.
Finally were the plates silk screened or enameled. I sure would like to find an original to answer all of those questions.
Thanks again for the answer on the 2nd casting date.
Best Regards,
Steve