p51 wrote:
Pat Carry wrote:
To get National Museum status, is that an offical title bestowed upon an institution by some sort of committee? Just how does that work?
I always wondered that as well. For example, many in the railroad preservation field have taken exception to the train museum in Green Bay calling themsevles the "National railroad museum," as a similar named museum in England really
is the national museum. Green Bay isn't in that class at all.
How about the "National Museum of WW2" in New Orleans? The name is a joke, if you've actually been there.
In the US, a National Museum must be so designated by Congress. The National Museum of WWII in New Orleans has been so designated. According to its web site, the National Museum of WWII Aviation has applied for, but not yet received, such a designation. See:
http://www.worldwariiaviation.org/index ... resolutionIn most other countries a national museum is defined as one owned and run by the national government.
It's not clear what criteria Congress uses to award a museum the designation of being the US's "National [Subject] Museum", but the NMWW2A's Congressional sponsor represented in introducing its bill that "the National Museum of World War II Aviation in Colorado Springs, Colorado is the only museum in the United States that exists to exclusively preserve and promote an understanding of the role of aviation in winning World War II." Hmm.
For what it's worth, since it's been mentioned, the National Railroad Museum in Green Bay received its Congressional designation in 1956. It does not appear that the National Airline History Museum is a real National Museum, but it's hard to be sure. It strikes me as a bit deceptive to name your museum the "National [Subject] Museum" or "National Museum of [Subject]" if it is not a designated National Museum, but I don't know if it's specifically prohibited.
And if you're wondering about the web site's reference to the process being tabled because of Congressional Rule 28:
http://www.gop.gov/about/rules?rule-28August