Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri May 02, 2025 4:38 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 9:08 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7800
.

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Last edited by Mark Allen M on Fri Aug 31, 2012 10:28 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:22 am
Posts: 536
Location: Tampa, Florida
HE-111-Z Zewing or something like that. was a glider transport for the ME 323 or ME 321

_________________
My racing will fund my warbirding. Hopefully...

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/#!/ChristopherDeshongRacing
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ChrisDRacing


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 11:14 am
Posts: 215
AMAZING PHOTOS!!!!! :drink3:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2012 10:20 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
Zwilling, it means 'twin' and it was very much better than the original setup on the 321 glider of using three ME-110's in what was called 'troika schlep' where all it took was one engine on one airplane to sneeze and all three tow aircraft would most likely collide into each other.

The other two gliders are GOTHA 242 troop gliders.

FHC's airplane was modified in the field as far as I've read. I forgot to note that the two A6M-2K's shown are factory built as they have the anti spin strakes on the fuselage ahead of the horizontal stabs like the spin preventer strakes installed on Tiger Moths

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Last edited by The Inspector on Tue Aug 21, 2012 2:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 11:44 am
Posts: 844
Location: DAL glidepath
Very cool photos, thanks for posting.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:17 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7800
StangStung wrote:
Very cool photos, thanks for posting.


Of course, my pleasure. Still hoping someone will enlighten me on my first question. I haven't found anything on the subject yet. Sorry if it's an "amateuristic" question but I don't recall anyone ever asking it. :wink:

1. Did B-17's, B-24's or any large Commonwealth bombers ever fly combat missions against mainland Japan during the war? I have never heard of missions using these types, but I haven't researched the thought much. Anyone have any evidence to offer?

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 587
The C-46 was used in the ETO on a limited basis for Operation VARSITY--24 MAR 45. The 313th TCG was equipped with them. The 313th was possibly the most experienced TCG in the ETO having been involved in every airborne drop since Sicily, as well as providing the cadre for the formation of the 9th TCC Pathfinder School/Group.

The unit shown with code 5X is the 29th TCS of the 313th TCG. Dropped elements of 3rd Bn 513th Parachute Infantry Regiment of the 17th Airborne Division

313 TCG lost 14 C-46s on 24MAR45 alone. (29 TCS lost two) Veterans tell me they reeked of avgas fumes.

MACRs for the 29 TCS aircraft lost state that the nose code and radio call letters were "battleship grey"...which can be interpreted as a pale blue...and appear to photograph white.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 10:54 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7800
Thx Pathfinder for the info.

How about a couple Interesting canopies. Never seen a Malcolm type hood on a P-47 or an F2G type canopy on an FG-1? and vise versa?

Image

Image

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2012 4:26 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:52 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Hudson, MA
I once did some volunteer restoration work with a man who had done nose art on B-24s in the Pacific and they were flying missions against Japan itself at the end of the war from Okinawa. My father in law's Navy transport was used to move B-24 ground crews to Okinawa as well. I don't think the B-17 ever flew combat missions against mainland Japan. Though it may have been possible against the northern most islands flying from Alaska.

_________________
"I can't understand it, I cut it twice and it's still too short!" Robert F. Dupre' 1923-2010 Go With God.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:19 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 12:28 pm
Posts: 1195
[quote="Mark Allen M"]First a couple of questions for the history experts.

1. Did B-17's, B-24's or any large Commonwealth bombers ever fly combat missions against mainland Japan during the war?

One footnote on the often forgotten heavy, the B-32 Dominator, which did fly a few photo-recon runs over mainland Japan very late in the war.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consolidat ... _Dominator


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: OD/NG and 317 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group