Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Tue May 13, 2025 4:48 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 10:48 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7802
.

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Last edited by Mark Allen M on Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 10:56 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:27 am
Posts: 2463
Location: Ellerslie Georgia, USA
Image

Man is that one Fug-Ugly airframe....British or French? Brits built a lot of Fug-Ugly aeroplanes

_________________
Kind Regards,
Gary Lewis
J.A.F.O.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 10:57 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 1:54 am
Posts: 5200
Location: Stratford, CT.
What's unusual about the Hellcat in the first shot? Can't see anything different or wacky.

_________________
Keep Em' Flying,
Christopher Soltis

Dedicated to the preservation and education of The Sikorsky Memorial Airport

CASC Blog Page: http://ctair-space.blogspot.com/
Warbird Wear: https://www.redbubble.com/people/warbirdwear/shop

Chicks Dig Warbirds.......right?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:01 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:34 pm
Posts: 2923
Warbird Kid wrote:
What's unusual about the Hellcat in the first shot? Can't see anything different or wacky.

The XF6F-4 sported 4 20MM cannons instead of the standard 6 .50cal...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:05 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:40 pm
Posts: 1471
Warbirdnerd wrote:
Warbird Kid wrote:
What's unusual about the Hellcat in the first shot? Can't see anything different or wacky.

The XF6F-4 sported 4 20MM cannons instead of the standard 6 .50cal...


It also sports the very large gear doors as found on the prototype Hellcat. Or could it be that the prototype was used to create the -4 Hellcat?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:08 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 12:40 pm
Posts: 1471
Mark Allen M wrote:
I know that's an FW190 on the right but can't make out what that is on the left

Image


The bird on the left is a Swedish FFVS J 22 fighter.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:16 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:34 pm
Posts: 2923
C VEICH wrote:
Warbirdnerd wrote:
Warbird Kid wrote:
What's unusual about the Hellcat in the first shot? Can't see anything different or wacky.

The XF6F-4 sported 4 20MM cannons instead of the standard 6 .50cal...


It also sports the very large gear doors as found on the prototype Hellcat. Or could it be that the prototype was used to create the -4 Hellcat?

From Wiki:
Quote:
Prior to the XF6F-2 the XF6F-1 prototype (02981) became a testbed for a projected F6F-4: the XF6F-4, which first flew on 3 October 1942, was armed with four 20mm M2 cannon and was powered by an R-2800-27. This model was rejected and 02981 was converted to an F6F-3 and also delivered to the navy


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:27 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7802
.

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Last edited by Mark Allen M on Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2006 9:17 pm
Posts: 697
Location: Deepinahearta, TX.
According to Wiki:

The Lockheed XP-49 (company Model 522) was an advancement on the P-38 Lightning for a fighter in response to U.S. Army Air Corps proposal 39-775. Intended to use the new 24-cylinder Pratt & Whitney X-1800 engine, this proposal, which was for an aircraft substantially similar to the P-38, was assigned the designation XP-49, while the competing Grumman Model G-46 was awarded second place and designated XP-50. Ordered in October 1939 and approved on January 8, 1940, the X-1800-powered XP-49 would feature a pressurized cockpit and armament of two 20 mm (.79 in) cannon and four 0.5 in (12.7 mm) machine guns. However, after two months into the contract a decision was made to substitute the Continental XI-1430-1 (or IV-1430) twelve cylinder liquid-cooled inverted vee engines for the X-1800. The XP-49, 40-3055, first flew on 11 November 1942. A crash landing on 1 January 1943 [1] occurred when the port landing gear failed to lock down due to a combined hydraulic and electric failure, and the XP-49 flew again on 16 February 1943 after repairs were made. The preliminary flight data showed that performance of the XP-49 was not sufficiently better than the production P-38, and with a questionable future for the XI-1430 engine, to warrant disruption of the production line to introduce the new model aircraft. Consideration of quantity production was therefore abandoned.

The aircraft was flown to Wright Field, and after various problems further work on the XP-49 was halted.


Mark Allen M wrote:
P-38 with some fancy looking power plants

Image


_________________
Cheers,

Craig

Facebook Groups:

U.S. Marine Corps Sikorsky HRS / CH-19 Helicopter Database
U.S. Coast Guard Sikorsky HO4S / HH-19 Helicopter Database


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 12:39 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5663
Location: Minnesota, USA
Brewster XA-32

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brewster_XA-32


Mark Allen M wrote:

Image


_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 1:15 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:11 pm
Posts: 3160
Location: MQS- Coatesville, PA
This is where the Wright Field folks ran out of ideas of what to do with this and kept dropping it from increasing heights until it bent and broke IIRC. I believe it was post war and the engines kept it from flying so they investigated structural failures with it.
Craig59 wrote:
According to Wiki:

The Lockheed XP-49 (company Model 522) was an advancement on the P-38 Lightning for a fighter in response to U.S. Army Air Corps proposal 39-775. Intended to use the new 24-cylinder Pratt & Whitney X-1800 engine, this proposal, which was for an aircraft substantially similar to the P-38, was assigned the designation XP-49, while the competing Grumman Model G-46 was awarded second place and designated XP-50. Ordered in October 1939 and approved on January 8, 1940, the X-1800-powered XP-49 would feature a pressurized cockpit and armament of two 20 mm (.79 in) cannon and four 0.5 in (12.7 mm) machine guns. However, after two months into the contract a decision was made to substitute the Continental XI-1430-1 (or IV-1430) twelve cylinder liquid-cooled inverted vee engines for the X-1800. The XP-49, 40-3055, first flew on 11 November 1942. A crash landing on 1 January 1943 [1] occurred when the port landing gear failed to lock down due to a combined hydraulic and electric failure, and the XP-49 flew again on 16 February 1943 after repairs were made. The preliminary flight data showed that performance of the XP-49 was not sufficiently better than the production P-38, and with a questionable future for the XI-1430 engine, to warrant disruption of the production line to introduce the new model aircraft. Consideration of quantity production was therefore abandoned.

The aircraft was flown to Wright Field, and after various problems further work on the XP-49 was halted.


Mark Allen M wrote:
P-38 with some fancy looking power plants

Image


_________________
Rich Palmer

Remember an Injured Youth
benstear.org
#64- Stay Strong and Keep the Faith

BOOM BOOM, ROUND ROUND, PROPELLER GO

Don't Be A Dilbert!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:19 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 7:13 pm
Posts: 5663
Location: Minnesota, USA
Nakajima Ki-87


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakajima_Ki-87

http://www.warbirdsresourcegroup.org/IJ ... aki87.html

http://blog-imgs-44.fc2.com/m/i/n/mini0 ... import.jpg

http://www.geocities.jp/tokugawa_navy/C_Ki-87.jpg


Mark Allen M wrote:

Image


_________________
It was a good idea, it just didn't work.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 2:39 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
The French looking double everything is the SNCAC NC-1071 which started out as the NC-1070 with two piston engines, 1947.

Blohm & Voss were handed the development contract to the Me-155 and it became the BV HA 155 a high altitude interceptor, contracts issued just days before the war ended.

The Buck Rogers art deco looking jet is the CAPRONI N-1 which used a buried twin row piston engine to turn the inlet compressor and the aft fuselage/ tail cone had to be removed to light off the jet part, usually with a huge flame until it got going.

The smiling Germans are leaning on a rather sorry looking Yakovlev AIR 15 from about 1936.

The Swedish FFV was designed and built while under embargo by the U.S. for engines and/or engine parts so the Swedes went ahead and did all their own R&D and metallurgy and turned out a first rate copy of the P&W WASP SC-3G-neener-neener.

The BREWSTER XA-32 'GRIZZLY' was the last airframe produced by Brewster, an ill handling P.O.S. About the time this pig hit the air, the War Dept caught up with Brewster and their shenanigans and moved quickly to close them up there's a BEST BUY or COSTCO located on the site of the old factory. GOOGLE BREWSTERS history on Wikipedia, what a chain of scams and blunders.

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 19, 2005 1:14 am
Posts: 854
The Inspector wrote:
The smiling Germans are leaning on a rather sorry looking Yakovlev AIR 15 from about 1936.

Do you mean AIR-14?

I don't know a helluvalot about this thing but I believe the AIR-14 was the prototype and production models were designated UT-1. There was a similar 2-seat design designated UT-2; both were trainers. Here's a few more images of UT-1s, including another view of the ship in the photo Mark posted...

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


And a shot of some UT-2s...

Image


Fade to Black...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 3:39 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2012 1:48 pm
Posts: 7802
.

_________________
“Knowing what’s right, doesn’t mean much unless you do what’s right.”


Last edited by Mark Allen M on Fri Aug 31, 2012 12:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 28 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: flyingsailor and 283 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group