Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Thu Jun 19, 2025 3:42 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 3:51 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:10 am
Posts: 1132
Location: Cambridge, New Zealand
Here are some photos taken today at Avspecs Ltd at Ardmore, Auckland, of the Mosquito and Spitfire currently under rebuild.

http://rnzaf.proboards.com/index.cgi?ac ... read=15714

_________________
The Wings Over New Zealand Forum http://rnzaf.proboards.com

The Wings Over New Zealand Show http://www.cambridgeairforce.org.nz/WONZ_Show.html

Wings Over Cambridge http://www.cambridgeairforce.org.nz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 9:46 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 10:14 am
Posts: 1694
Location: canada
Wow she looks beautiful!

_________________
Cheers,
Peter

________


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 08, 2012 9:56 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:15 pm
Posts: 1399
Location: San Diego CA
Very nice! :drink3: They are going to be stunners when done!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 7:18 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:10 am
Posts: 1132
Location: Cambridge, New Zealand
More photos from May 2012
http://rnzaf.proboards.com/index.cgi?ac ... read=16268

_________________
The Wings Over New Zealand Forum http://rnzaf.proboards.com

The Wings Over New Zealand Show http://www.cambridgeairforce.org.nz/WONZ_Show.html

Wings Over Cambridge http://www.cambridgeairforce.org.nz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 7:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 190
Location: Waco, TX
Is it just me or does that cockpit look really tiny? Were Mosquitos a single-pilot aircraft only or were they dual seats, or was it a navigator seat...? Also, looks like no pass-thru from the nose area to the cockpit...?

Beautiful aircraft. Can't wait to see it finished.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 8:33 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 25, 2006 9:18 pm
Posts: 2275
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanks for the update!

I'm getting so anxious to see that Mossie take to the skies again!

As for the cockpit set up. With the bomber version, there was only the one seat for the pilot, while the fighter version had two seats Side-by-side. That being said, I think I remember hearing the navigator's seat was set back a few inches further than the pilot, right?

As for dual controls though, I don't think ever built them with dual controls, or at least not dual controls for combat aircraft.

I could be totally wrong, but that's what my brain's database came up with. I hope I'm right, but please correct me if I'm wrong.

Peace,

David M


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 1:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2004 7:18 am
Posts: 671
Location: Berkshire, UK
TriangleP wrote:
davey, de Havilland produced a T Mk III trainer with dual controls, but not for combat as you note. I suppose they made these after some pilots crashed on takeoff/landing. The few pilots I've talked to said the engine swing on takeoff was impressive and could put you right into the ditch if the pilot didn't compensate with power levels and rudder input. Landing could be a serious handful on one engine. A couple of them also said they learned by sitting in the navigators seat of a regular MkVI (single control) and learned by watching the instructor takeoff and land, then were told to "take her up" by themselves after this. Some of these guys had a couple of hundred hours flying under their belt by the time they were posted to Mosquitos, so they weren't dummies and managed to learn by just doing it.


Indeed there was a T.III dual control trainer. The much missed ex-BAe Mosquito that fatally crashed at Barton back in the mid 1990's was a T.III, as is the ex-IWM Mosquito now owned by FHC and now in also in NZ for restoration.

It says a lot for the female pilots of the wartime ATA, that they flew Mosquitos solo, and often for the first time solo, with little more than their ATA pilot notes bookets for reference. :supz:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 2:04 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 8:54 am
Posts: 3331
Any news on the Spitfire XVI for Tony Banta?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 4:01 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!

Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:10 am
Posts: 1132
Location: Cambridge, New Zealand
Mike, I think that is still in the queue but will start after the XIV rolls out in a few months time. It was in the hangar when I was last there, awaiting its time.

_________________
The Wings Over New Zealand Forum http://rnzaf.proboards.com

The Wings Over New Zealand Show http://www.cambridgeairforce.org.nz/WONZ_Show.html

Wings Over Cambridge http://www.cambridgeairforce.org.nz


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 09, 2012 10:50 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Just to add to a few questions answers...

All Mosquitos were two crew aircraft, and the pilot's seat was slightly forward of the navigator's.

This has a fighter nose, with four .303 guns and ammunition tanks in it, plus four 20mm cannon underneath and back into the fw'd bomb bay.

Those with the bomber / Photo Recon nose had a 'pass through' to the stbd (right) and a prone bomb aimer's position, also used for aiming camera in the PR versions.

Because of the guns in the fighter / fighter-bomber and night-fighter versions, the entry door is on the stbd side. On the bomber / PR types it's on the lower stbd side, the original position. Fighters also had a flat armoured windscreen and a 'stick' control for the pilot, bombers a yoke and a 'Vee' windscreen.

The trainer issue is actually cultural, and shows a difference in attitudes to modern thinking. In the 1930s, British Commonwealth military pilots qualified as 'general duties' and were expected to be able to fly anything within their 'ticket's remit, without type conversions. There were general conversions for things like multi-engine and marine (flying boats and floatplanes) flying but rarely a formal course on a new type. They were expected to just fly what came next. Type conversion as a concept came in during W.W.II and after as a direct result of the general 'ticket' flying qualification becoming inadequate with the diversity and complexity (as well as performance) of W.W.II aircraft.

That's why the Mosquito (and Spitfire) dual control trainer versions were a postwar development, after the vast majority of pilots had learned to fly them without, and had a loss rate to match. Better late (and for training foreign sales pilots) than never.

Regards,

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 272 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group