Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Wed May 14, 2025 3:39 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 1:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:26 pm
Posts: 4
Possible recovery of Catalina and occupants.


http://www.portclintonnewsherald.com/ar ... ng-pattern


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 5:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2008 7:04 pm
Posts: 133
Location: Rudolph,Ohio
Neat to see some local news. Thanks for posting, JOE

_________________
Joe Amend - YAM Restoration


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 6:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 7:35 pm
Posts: 587
Regrettably it is highly unlikely that they will find human remains on this aircraft. IT has been underwater for 70 years.

Think about it... Robert Ballard found the Titanic 73 years after it sank...this plane was found 70 years after it went down. There were no organic remains found on Titanic and, unfortunately, the same will be the case here.

At best they may find dog tags, and those will be buried with all honors.

JPAC has enough trouble getting to land oriented sites let alone one that is underwater. It took them over 60 years to get to a land site less than 30 miles from their building on their own island. Sad to say I wouldn't hold my breath on this one.

Parks Canada should document the site and attempt to identify possible occupants in situ on their own. This is done based on finding things that a person might wear. Dog tags are the best identifier. Weapons, commo gear and other non organic material that might survive a marine environment. If they wait for JPAC to sync up with them it will be decades before they go back to do anything that looks like a recovery. Interestingly enough press reports that keep this story in front of the public will actually move JPAC to do something...JPAC tends to be reactive rather than pro-active.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:39 pm 
Offline
WIX Motor Pool Officer
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 21, 2004 7:56 pm
Posts: 680
Location: Vermont
Pathfinder wrote:
Regrettably it is highly unlikely that they will find human remains on this aircraft. IT has been underwater for 70 years.

Think about it... Robert Ballard found the Titanic 73 years after it sank...this plane was found 70 years after it went down. There were no organic remains found on Titanic and, unfortunately, the same will be the case here.

At best they may find dog tags, and those will be buried with all honors.

JPAC has enough trouble getting to land oriented sites let alone one that is underwater. It took them over 60 years to get to a land site less than 30 miles from their building on their own island. Sad to say I wouldn't hold my breath on this one.

Parks Canada should document the site and attempt to identify possible occupants in situ on their own. This is done based on finding things that a person might wear. Dog tags are the best identifier. Weapons, commo gear and other non organic material that might survive a marine environment. If they wait for JPAC to sync up with them it will be decades before they go back to do anything that looks like a recovery. Interestingly enough press reports that keep this story in front of the public will actually move JPAC to do something...JPAC tends to be reactive rather than pro-active.


Actually whether or not there are organic remains aboard would be determined by local conditions. A case in point would be HMS Victory which was lost in 1744. Locacted by Odyssey Marine Exploration just a few years ago, they did in fact find human remains at the site. I will agree that it would be good if Parks Canada got permission to survey the site to determine if in fact there are remains at the site. That might help push the process along and make it possible to bring these men home at long last.

_________________
It's you and me against the world.

We attack at dawn.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 7:58 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 2:02 am
Posts: 4695
Location: Yucca Valley, CA
Interesting story - don't often hear about recovering a whole aircraft to recover human remains.

Is this particular PBY a seaplane or an amphibian?

And what's the determining factor as to whether human remains (bones) still would be found? Salt/fresh water, temperature or depth? I remember the story of a Japanese pilot's skull being found at Pearl Harbor recently, and I've also seen the Titanic images of nothing more than a pair of shoes where the victims had come to rest.

_________________
Image
All right, Mister Dorfmann, start pullin'!
Pilot: "Flap switch works hard in down position."
Mechanic: "Flap switch checked OK. Pilot needs more P.T." - Flight report, TB-17G 42-102875 (Hobbs AAF)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:01 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 11:52 am
Posts: 1525
Location: Williamsburg, VA
I stand to be corrected on this, but as I understand it, the presence of remains is more dependent upon consumption than dissolution... the remains of the unfortunate Titanic passengers and crew were consumed by organisms living at that extreme depth. There aren't too many aquatic organisms which will consume bone material as well, apparently- witness the finding of skeletal remains aboard the Mary Rose and Vasa when those ships were recovered after several hundred years. So the probability is very good that there will be skeletal remains aboard the aircraft.

Having accomplished that and brought the unfortunate crewmen home, my question would then be, what will be done with the aircraft? It sounds as though it may be in really good condition otherwise, being in fresh water... any thoughts on that?

Lynn


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 1:34 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:18 am
Posts: 1574
Location: Northwest Ohio
lmritger wrote:
I stand to be corrected on this, but as I understand it, the presence of remains is more dependent upon consumption than dissolution... the remains of the unfortunate Titanic passengers and crew were consumed by organisms living at that extreme depth. There aren't too many aquatic organisms which will consume bone material as well, apparently- witness the finding of skeletal remains aboard the Mary Rose and Vasa when those ships were recovered after several hundred years. So the probability is very good that there will be skeletal remains aboard the aircraft.

Having accomplished that and brought the unfortunate crewmen home, my question would then be, what will be done with the aircraft? It sounds as though it may be in really good condition otherwise, being in fresh water... any thoughts on that?

Lynn

Likewise with the Hunley. When this aircraft was first found and identified, the local news channels had broadcasts from Fremont. To the residents of Fremont it is a big deal. I agree, there should be some remains to be recovered.

_________________
A&P/I.A., A.A.S./Aviation Maintenance technology
Warbird salvage/recovery
One day I'll get that P-40!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 6:05 am
Posts: 271
Location: Oxfordshire
Lynn

From what I recall seein the video and speaking to Boris, there was very little remains for the pilot of the Bell P39Q-15 now being preservd for display in Buffallo. All the remains were in the foot well and there was not a lot. This was in cold fresh water at about 4-5m depth?

regards

Mark

_________________
'Coups De Foudre'
(511FS, 405FG watering hole), St Dizier, France 1944/45


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 2:21 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Thu Dec 21, 2006 8:32 am
Posts: 4324
Location: Battle Creek, MI
I have an old video of divers exploring the wreck of a ship that sank in Lake Superior in the 1920s. They found some skeletal remains after 70-odd years after she went down, so it's definitely possible that there could be ramains in the PBY.

SN


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], old iron and 318 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group