Thanks all for the analysis on Lockbourne...I think what was throwing me off was the 1943 photo was taken at a fairly low altitude while the sat pics are from a much higher altitude. I was trying to place the big runway to the south much further than where it actually resided. That must have been some big runway...looks like it would be able to support B-29s taking off it pairs!
Mike B Fellow F-4 Resto Team member: that's the pic I was looking for...I need to get that Lockbourne book some day...saw it a few times in Barnes & Noble at Easton.
Jerry: thanks for the exhaustive analysis. I wondered if the arrow-like intersection was the same arrow in the 1943 pic....your steer confirmed that. Funny how what I thought was a monster runway is smaller than I expected....its still pretty wide; I glanced at it while departing 23L a number of months back.
I drove thru the base area last month while my wife and I had some time to kill...very strange to see the empty street areas and the few remaining buildings from what I remember as a bustling air force base back when I was growing up there...
Now if we could just bring back those B-47s...
