JDK wrote:
However it mustn't be overlooked that an F-111G, "the Boneyard Wrangler" is now in show to the general public for free at the RAAF Museum, and an F-111C - the Aussie-only model, on promise for the same museum. That's the core and important point in preservation terms.
I think the QAM campaign should ask the pretty obvious question of what asbestos has been removed from the F-111G at Point Cook, and what was the manhours to do so, as clearly we couldn't have it on show to the public at Point Cook, unless it had been made safe - its a good question to ask in a Ministerial letter, or even to pass to a friendly supporter in Opposition for question time if they can be interested in the campaign.
The Australian Moveable Cultural laws encourage at least two examples of significant heritage objects in public collections in Australia, for diversity of location and risk mitigation, two in the one collection doesnt really meet the objectives, and obviously the G and the C are telling slightly different stories. Clearly then there is room for other C's and even G's to be preserved in Australia, but equally one in every museum is an overkill and waste of resources.
But of course there remains the question of how historically significant the F-111 really is to Australia, which should drive a National collection policy as to how many are preserved, and in a perfect world - where.
ie A National Collection Policy, not just a RAAF Collection Policy, and Defence is not the appropriate government agency to determine a National Collection Policy.
Regards
Mark Pilkington