Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 13, 2025 1:36 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: PBY flight engineer?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 11:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:23 am
Posts: 699
The PBY originally had a flight engineer's station up in the center pylon, with windows on each side. Do PBYs to this day require an F/E, or was there a time when that function was phased out?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PBY flight engineer?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:17 pm
Posts: 272
Stephan Wilkinson wrote:
The PBY originally had a flight engineer's station up in the center pylon, with windows on each side. Do PBYs to this day require an F/E, or was there a time when that function was phased out?



No FE is required on PBYs now and they haven't been for as long as I remember. I would guess it changed around the time the first PBYs went on the civil registry. Everything important was moved down to the cockpit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PBY flight engineer?
PostPosted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 11:06 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
bombadier29 wrote:
No FE is required on PBYs now and they haven't been for as long as I remember. I would guess it changed around the time the first PBYs went on the civil registry. Everything important was moved down to the cockpit.

Interesting question. No modern Cats I'm aware of use a pylon-located F/E, as bombadier29's said; however there were numerous PBYs and Cats on W.W.II wartime civil registers (Qantas and BOAC for two) and I suspect these had F/Es as normal (but I haven't checked) so better to say postwar change, rather than a civil adaptation, as I believe the F/E role remained through the war in most users crewing.

Better info (David Legg - where are you?) welcome!

Regards,

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PBY flight engineer?
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 8:49 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue May 25, 2004 11:57 am
Posts: 168
ACAM,s PBY had a f/e postion and a f/e on board when it crashed in Oct, of 1957 in labrador, and was recovered in oct of1986


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PBY flight engineer?
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 1:07 pm
Posts: 338
JDK wrote:
Interesting question. No modern Cats I'm aware of use a pylon-located F/E, as bombadier29's said; however there were numerous PBYs and Cats on W.W.II wartime civil registers (Qantas and BOAC for two) and I suspect these had F/Es as normal (but I haven't checked) so better to say postwar change, rather than a civil adaptation, as I believe the F/E role remained through the war in most users crewing.

Better info (David Legg - where are you?) welcome!

Regards,


This is an interesting area and one I have not researched to any degree. James is quite right that the QEA/BOAC Double Sunrise Cats would have retained the FE position. Regarding other RAF Catalinas, off the top of my head I can only think of three that went on to have civil careers, one in Bermuda which I suspect kept the FE position and two in Iceland, both MkIII amphibians. When I was in Iceland recently speaking to some veteran commercial Catalina pilots there, I am sure one of them said the FE position was retained. I would imagine that Catalinas that continued in military service post-war with the US forces, RAAF and RNZAF retained the FE position but I am less sure about RCAF aircraft as quite a few of these continued in military service until the very late-1950s and underwent substantial modification.

The commercial Landseaire conversion certainly did away with the FE position amd many other civil Catalinas were similarly converted although a quick look at the Model 28-5ACF TC does not show that the removal of the FE position was mandatory.

The first Catalina I flew in regularly (the recently scrapped VP-BPS ex-BuAer46633) still had a rudimentary seat in the pylon which was fun to fly in although was not supposed to be used during landing and take off. Others I have flown in including the current G-PBYA have not had seats there.

So, in summary, an area that needs more research.

_________________
David Legg
Editor, The Catalina News
The Catalina Society
Author: Consolidated PBY Catalina - The Peacetime Record


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PBY flight engineer?
PostPosted: Sat Jul 14, 2012 3:49 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
It would raise some eyebrows if it was on your license,
Single Engine land-Multi Engine land-DC-3- PBY Flight Engineer 8)

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PBY flight engineer?
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 12:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 1:07 pm
Posts: 338
David Legg wrote:
.....but I am less sure about RCAF aircraft as quite a few of these continued in military service until the very late-1950s and underwent substantial modification.


I have just looked at my copy of the RCAF Training Command Canso Flying Manual dated March 1959 which relates to Canso A amphibians and it is clear that even at that late stage the Flight Engineer still had his position in the pylon.

_________________
David Legg
Editor, The Catalina News
The Catalina Society
Author: Consolidated PBY Catalina - The Peacetime Record


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PBY flight engineer?
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:43 am
Posts: 322
The Inspector wrote:
It would raise some eyebrows if it was on your license,
Single Engine land-Multi Engine land-DC-3- PBY Flight Engineer 8)


Wouldn't one need to have a Flight Engineer, Reciprocating? My FE ticket has no type specific info, but is Turbojet, so no drama or coolness.
Chris...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PBY flight engineer?
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 1:14 am
Posts: 39
Location: Little Rock AFB
JAARS opperated a PBY for several years and had a flight engineer. I need to add on my civil flight engineer rating. Military FE only right now. Would look cool on my Civil cert.... COM SEL & MEL, LRJET. USAF C-130E/H flight engineer


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PBY flight engineer?
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:24 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
DC-3 used to be a separate rating from MEL and isn't FE Turbine type specific?

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PBY flight engineer?
PostPosted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 5:44 pm
Posts: 966
Location: Seattle, WA
cwmc wrote:
The Inspector wrote:
It would raise some eyebrows if it was on your license,
Single Engine land-Multi Engine land-DC-3- PBY Flight Engineer 8)


Wouldn't one need to have a Flight Engineer, Reciprocating? My FE ticket has no type specific info, but is Turbojet, so no drama or coolness.
Chris...


Is that when you were flying FE for the Wright Brothers, Chris?






Sorry..... :drink3:

_________________
Offer me solutions, offer me alternatives, and I decline......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: PBY flight engineer?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 16, 2012 7:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 3:14 pm
Posts: 126
David Legg wrote:
JDK wrote:
Interesting question. No modern Cats I'm aware of use a pylon-located F/E, as bombadier29's said; however there were numerous PBYs and Cats on W.W.II wartime civil registers (Qantas and BOAC for two) and I suspect these had F/Es as normal (but I haven't checked) so better to say postwar change, rather than a civil adaptation, as I believe the F/E role remained through the war in most users crewing.

Better info (David Legg - where are you?) welcome!

Regards,


This is an interesting area and one I have not researched to any degree. James is quite right that the QEA/BOAC Double Sunrise Cats would have retained the FE position. Regarding other RAF Catalinas, off the top of my head I can only think of three that went on to have civil careers, one in Bermuda which I suspect kept the FE position and two in Iceland, both MkIII amphibians. When I was in Iceland recently speaking to some veteran commercial Catalina pilots there, I am sure one of them said the FE position was retained. I would imagine that Catalinas that continued in military service post-war with the US forces, RAAF and RNZAF retained the FE position but I am less sure about RCAF aircraft as quite a few of these continued in military service until the very late-1950s and underwent substantial modification.

The commercial Landseaire conversion certainly did away with the FE position amd many other civil Catalinas were similarly converted although a quick look at the Model 28-5ACF TC does not show that the removal of the FE position was mandatory.

The first Catalina I flew in regularly (the recently scrapped VP-BPS ex-BuAer46633) still had a rudimentary seat in the pylon which was fun to fly in although was not supposed to be used during landing and take off. Others I have flown in including the current G-PBYA have not had seats there.

So, in summary, an area that needs more research.



Hi all, the HARS Catalina VH-PBZ in Australia has the flight engineers compartment still active. New re calibrated fuel flow meters have recently been re-installed with the current Flight Engineer now also responsible for firing the fire extinguishers which HARS have now fitted as an update mod.

_________________
Just part of the team keeping them going
F111 Ex USAF 67-109 A8-109
Canberra WT492
PBY USN 46679
Constellation USAF 54-0145
Dakota 44-76774
Skymaster 44-9126
Sabre A64-901
HARS, Albion Park, AUSTRALIA


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 271 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group