RyanShort1 wrote:
Well, it looks to me like some folks are trying hard to sabotage any work that could be done. I saw two related items within the last two weeks.
I don't want to post the source, because I think anything posted here could be used against those I hope to see succeed. I do wonder about some US (and other) individuals who's actions make me think that they really believe the plane would be better off out there in the jungle.
Yes, it's valuable, but it's value is to a limited group of people, and I believe that these folks are giving the people overseas a fairy tale that is nothing more than way to reach some other (I know not what) end, that probably benefits someone else.
What's really odd is that from all appearances, the folks out there really stand to benefit from the deal, if they'd stop acting like a bunch of corrupt bureaucrats.
Ryan
Ryan,
I'm not sure if thats to suggest my post is somehow contributing to that sabatoge (intentionally or not)?,
so just to put it on the record, I have and do support the retention and restoration of some of these relics in the region of the battlefield, and am dis-appointed PNG does not have the resources to recover/restore and display some of this wartime heritage itself, (and yes, even to leave some of the wreckage in place if thats all its fit for) but the country has far more pressing issues and demands on its funds to be able to achieve that. I certainly support the recovery of rare and viable restoration projects such as Swamp Ghost rather than let them rot away in the bush, or worse be scrapped by the locals, which unfortunately is the real future of many of the wrecks. It is a pity PNG has not invested sufficient administrative resources to manage a take a few and return one recovery system similar to that undertaken for the A20's by the RAAF, providing a possible win win for every one.
What I have opposed previously here, is a view that all WW2 wreckage in the PNG is the property and heritage of the USA and that there is no PNG heritage rights exist, or are derived from being the battlefield, ie the place where it happened. Ie implying the country of location has no rights to apply heritage limitations to exports, an attitude sometimes also applied to other countries including my own.
If PNG really had the interest, resources, and ability to restore, display and protect Swamp Ghost I would support its retention in PNG, however thats not the reality, or ability of PNG today.
I do hope Swamp Ghost will be released for export and restored, rather than being left to die quickly near the port in Lae, by loss, pilfering and scrapping slowly by stealth whereever it might be stored, or by slow corrosion and souvenir hunting or moonlight scrapping where it sat in the swamp.
The real decisions about releasing Swamp Ghost have to happen in PNG, not elsewhere such as internet forums based on our views and opinions. To influence that decision or sabotage hopes of its export, you would need to have the ear of important PNG Bureaucrats, Politicians pushing your arguments against export (or the Judiciary, if it went to court).
Unfortunately the one way to really undermine that process is to start flinging comments about corruption freely about, even here on the internet simply because the answer is not what is wanted, as the largest insult you can give a Politician/Bureaucrat is to imply they are corrupt or can be bought?, particularly if they happen to be one of those rare ones who are honest!, and that can harden their views against outcomes, rather than be open to them?
My thread here was due to the apparant quoted PNG newspaper report of September 2008 that implied at least one PNG committee etc had changed its mind to let it be exported. This was the first I had heard of such a decision, and the last reported here in Wix was that it was clear to come home? (perhaps based on the same decision? in 2008?).
In anycase that appears to be the last report on the Pacific wrecks site, and yet its nearly 16 months later?, and my thread here is simply an inquiry to know if it was being exported or still hung up in political / legal battles?, and not part of any efforts to influence the outcome, other than support a prompt and responsible one for the future of the aircraft.
regards
Mark Pilkington