Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 6:24 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 9:20 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 4:55 pm
Posts: 1105
Location: Australia
.
"In the wrong place, at the wrong time - twice", and lived to tell the tale to the ripe old age of 93!

A "veteran" of a different type, going west.


Quote:
Hiroshima and Nagasaki survivor dies aged 93

Tsutomu Yamaguchi, the only official survivor of both atomic bombs in Japan, dies of stomach cancer

Tsutomu Yamaguchi witnessed at close hand the nuclear devastation of two Japanese cities, and lived to tell the tale. Now it will be left to others to tell his incredible story after his death this week at 93.

Yamaguchi, the only person officially recognised as a survivor of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, died on Monday of stomach cancer at a hospital in Nagasaki, his family said today.

The mayor of Nagasaki said "a precious storyteller has been lost".

Yamaguchi, then an engineer for the shipbuilder Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, was in Hiroshima on a business trip on 6 August 1945 when an American B-29 bomber, the Enola Gay, dropped an atomic bomb on the city, killing 80,000 people instantly and another 60,000 in the months that followed. The badly burned Yamaguchi, who was less than two miles from the blast, spent the night in an air raid shelter before returning home to Nagasaki, 180 miles away, two days later.

He was in Nagasaki on 9 August when a nuclear bomb devastated the city, killing an estimated 70,000 people. Japan surrendered less than a week later.

He, his wife and baby son survived and spent the following week in a shelter.

After the war Yamaguchi worked as a translator for the US forces in Nagasaki and later became a teacher. He did not speak publicly about his past until the death in 2005 of his second son – who was six months old at the time of the Nagasaki bombing – from cancer, aged 59.

"My double radiation exposure is now an official government record," he told the Mainichi newspaper last year. "It can tell the younger generation the horrifying history of the atomic bombings even after I die. I could have died on either of those two days. Everything that follows is a bonus."

In recent years he talked openly about life as a double A-bomb survivor and became a vocal supporter of nuclear disarmament. He wrote books and songs about his experiences, and in 2006 made a speech at the UN in New York to mark the release of Niju Hibaku (Double Irradiation), a documentary about him and other people who had lived through both nuclear attacks.

Although 165 people are known to have lived through both attacks, Yamaguchi is the only one to have been officially recognised as a survivor twice over.

"Having experienced atomic bombings twice and survived, it is my destiny to talk about it," he told the UN.

Last month he was visited in hospital by the film director James Cameron, who is reportedly considering making a film about the bombings.

Yamaguchi's copy of the Atomic Bomb Victim Health Handbook, issued in 1957, entitled him and 260,000 other survivors to monthly allowances, free medical checkups and funeral costs.

Although the handbook confirmed he was within a three-kilometre radius of ground zero in both cities, reference to Hiroshima was deleted when he renewed it at Nagasaki city hall in 1960.

After refusing to grant him special double-survivor status because it would not affect his entitlements, officials relented last March, making him the first and so far only survivor of both attacks to be recognised by the authorities.

The blasts deprived him of the hearing in his left ear, but Yamaguchi's family said he was in relatively good health for most of his life. In later years he battled acute leukaemia, cataracts and other radiation-related ailments.


I'm not sure if he would feel incredibly unlucky? or incredibly lucky?, certainly not an experience anyone should suffer, let alone twice? and hopefully the world will not again see the need for the use of nuclear weapons!

Unfortunately while the "5 minutes to midnight clock" suffered during the cold war has been hopefully re-set to midday or earlier in regards to nuclear conflict between opposing Nation States, the rise of modern terrorism means an increasing risk of a rogue state, or corrupt security, providing a nuclear weapon (dirty bomb) for use by terrorists.



Regards

Mark Pilkington

_________________
20th Century - The Age of Manned Flight
"from Wrights to Armstrong in 66 years -WOW!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 7:10 pm
Posts: 648
Location: tempe, az
I guess he gives new meaning to the term "nuclear family"...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:02 pm
Posts: 566
Location: Brisbane Qld Australia
Mark, make no mistake the nuclear arms race of the 50's and 60's actually kept global peace. Conventional wars [as distinct from the current global war on terror aka the Crusades in reverse!] only occur when one side feels that they have an edge over the other. The "balance of terror" keeps folks in check. Ini\dia and Pakistan being a good example.

_________________
..defeat is never an option!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 7:35 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 4:55 pm
Posts: 1105
Location: Australia
Oscar,

I totally agree, the Mutually Assured Destruction doctrine wasnt as "MAD" as its name implied, but hopefully free trade and economic dependancies have moved us beyond the cold war into a period of mutual reliance?, and removed the finger hovering over the big red button.


Whereas there seems no negotiating or diplomatic solution to religious fantatics forming terrorist cells, wanting to bring down western civilisation as we know it, and no apparant reluctance to use any available weapons of mass destruction, or to target general public rather than military targets. - very hard to develop military defences against such attacks.

Regards

Mark Pilkington

_________________
20th Century - The Age of Manned Flight
"from Wrights to Armstrong in 66 years -WOW!"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 34 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group