Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat May 09, 2026 5:39 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Alaskan YL-15s
PostPosted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 10:28 pm
Posts: 788
Location: Washington State
I was looking through Airliners.net and saw a 1990 photo of a semi-derelict YL-15 on floats at Anchorage.

Anyone know its status...or anything about the other ex-USFS YL-15s?
The only thing I've ever heard is one was parted out and someone used the flaps (or entire wing) for a STOL homebuilt.

One was offered in the 90s in Trade-A-Plane.
I sent a letter (no phone # was given) but never heard anything back.

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:53 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 1:05 am
Posts: 3236
IIRC, wasn't this the one that is stored in Anoka, MN?


Saludos,


Tulio

_________________
Why take the best part of life out of your life, when you can have life with the best part of your life in your life?

I am one of them 'futbol' people.

Will the previous owner has pics of this double cabin sample

GOOD MORNING, WELCOME TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Press "1" for English.
Press "2" to disconnect until you have learned to speak English.


Sooooo, how am I going to know to press 1 or 2, if I do not speak English????


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 8:57 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 6:57 pm
Posts: 2716
Location: St Petersburg FL, USA
Was this the one (as seen over at Airliners), that one is serial # 47-432, N4770C, and it's airworthy status is in question according to FAA?

http://www.airliners.net/photo/Boeing-Y ... eb0dcc75dd

_________________
Image
Aviation Illustration Website
http://shepartstudio.com/illustration/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: I think...
PostPosted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 5:02 pm
Posts: 786
Location: US
that I saw that a couple (1-2) years ago on Ebay. I called and talked with them but they wanted WAY more than I was willing to pay. I don't know if its the same plane or not but the one I called on was partially disassembled


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ???
PostPosted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 5:30 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11475
Location: Salem, Oregon
Sam Richardson was looking at 2 or 3 in Alaska a few years ago.
He never made the deal so maybe hitting the cow with his SeaBee got him focused in other directions?

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 20, 2009 6:38 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 12:53 pm
Posts: 336
Location: U.K.
Why did Boeing get involved with a "Puddle jumper" like that?
I thought Billy Boeing only built BIG aeroplanes.

Rgds Cking


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 10:28 pm
Posts: 788
Location: Washington State
Holedigger wrote:
Was this the one (as seen over at Airliners), that one is serial # 47-432, N4770C, and it's airworthy status is in question according to FAA?


Yes, that's the plane I was referring to.


As to why Boeing built the plane....remember it was post war, they were looking for business. IIRC, it was designed before the KC-97 and B-47 production took up most of its time.

I have hunch they would have built any production models in Wichita at the ex-Stearman facility.

I don't have my book handy, so I don't know if it was built for the competition finally won by the L-19/O-1...which won after the Army lifted a very tight weight requirement (suited more towards a "new" L-4-type).

_________________
Remember the vets, the wonderful planes they flew and their sacrifices for a future many of them did not live to see.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 21, 2009 9:25 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:38 pm
Posts: 2664
Location: Nashville, Tennessee
As a kid , I used to have a Stearman book that listed all the Stearman types built. It had the YL-15 in the postwar activity of what was the Stearman division of Boeing. My book was loaned and not returned, unfortunatley.
My "guess", is that maybe it was designed and built at the Stearman factory and was hoped to be a success once the PT-17 production ended.

Another thought, why wouldn't the military just use the L-4's and L-5's they had in abundance? Well, after WW II, two major new types of military aviation were in their infancy, Rotary wing, and Search and Rescue operations. So the military had mixed success with the early helicopters that were having a lot of accidents, and were of limited utility.
They started requesting designs that fill in the gap between fixed and rotary wing operations plus fill the role of rotary wing if needed.
Thus, the ultra-stol desings like the Boeing YL-15, COnvair L-13, and that Northrop tri-motored transport. The weird stuff ran it's course once the helicopter designs got up to speed.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 169 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group