Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sun May 11, 2025 10:48 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 9:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:40 pm
Posts: 332
Location: Smithville, ON
I am looking for info on the squadrons of the aircraft in these photos.
Also location it might be!?
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2009 12:43 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
Beaubomber II was 42-63442 and served with the 73rd Wing, 499th Group, 879th Squadron. She flew from Isely Field, Saipan.

I can't tell squadron assignments for the other two photos because I don't see any ship numbers I can read, but the second picture is a 498th Group airplane, also 73rd Wing on Saipan.

Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2009 8:53 am 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
I would imagine they were all on Saipan and 73rd. The 314th BW on Guam would have AC numbers on the fuselage as well.

Thanks for the shots!!!!

I have never seen bombs layed out like this.., without being on a trailer prior to arming. How would they load these.., pick them back up and onto a trailer then crank them into the bombay? What a pain!!

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2009 9:00 am 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
Smis,

Those little cradles are designed to work with the small three-wheeled bomb trucks you see in many photos. Notice how the "legs" have the high arches, these arches are to allow the two outboard tires of the little cart to go through. Then you pick up the bomb and remove the cradle. I'm just now leaving the house, but I can find a photo of the three wheeler later if you'd like.

I'm still trying to figure out if the little handcarts were shipped with the M-5 bomb trailers or separately. A certain number of the cradles appear to have been delivered with the big trailer to the units.

Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2009 9:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 10:26 am
Posts: 550
Location: Northants, UK
I seem to recall that six cradles were shipped with each M5 Bomb Trailer, while one folding M1 Bomb Lift Truck handcart came with the M6 Bomb Service Truck.

All the best,
Paul

_________________
Paul Bellamy

401BG Association Historian & Honorary Life Member
401BG Historical Society (UK) Member
1st Air Division HQ Historical Society (UK) Founder Member
Director of Archives & Collections, Airfield Research Group Archive, Alconbury
RAF Alconbury Base Historian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2009 9:39 am 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
Always thought they carried them and loaded them like this!!! :shock: :lol:
Image

Image

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2009 9:41 am 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
Scott

Is this the trailer??.., in looking at the photo i can see how they would scoot them off of the trailer and onto the rack.., or was it vice versa?


Image

I always thought they would pull the trailer under the bombay and just rachet up the bombs.., apparently not!!!

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2009 10:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 10:26 am
Posts: 550
Location: Northants, UK
That's an M5 Bomb Trailer in the foreground, and it's nice to see a photo showing the unloading ramp in use.
The M1 Bomb Lift Truck is the pallet truck in the background in front of the nosewheel, ready to lift one of the loaded cradles.

The trailer would fit under a B-17, B-24s had to be loaded from the cradles due to the low fuselage.
I don't know about the clearance on a B-29 though.

All the best,
PB

_________________
Paul Bellamy

401BG Association Historian & Honorary Life Member
401BG Historical Society (UK) Member
1st Air Division HQ Historical Society (UK) Founder Member
Director of Archives & Collections, Airfield Research Group Archive, Alconbury
RAF Alconbury Base Historian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2009 12:54 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 12:56 pm
Posts: 3442
Location: North of Texas, South of Kansas
You had to use the M1 for the '29 as well, Paul. The forward turret and radome would obstruct getting the M5 in there. I'm not certain about the aft bay, but I don't think I have seen a photo of an M5 under either one.

Great photo, Smis--it's going into my personal bomb trailer restoration file with your permission! And as for loading the big trailer, that was generally done at the bomb dump by using the Chevy bomb loading truck (or its equivalent) that we've documented in my bomb trailer thread in the Maintenance Hangar.

Scott


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2009 1:36 pm 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
yah, I always loved the photo myself. The three wheeled carts, two of them.., one by the nose gear and one being pushed by the guy near the offloading ramp.

Now, the would wheel these under the bombay and then there was a way to crank them up and lock them down inside? How did they get from the cart to the racks?

Simple enough to pick up a 100lber by hand, as in the photos above.., but not a 500lber!

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2009 2:41 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 10:18 pm
Posts: 3293
Location: Phoenix, Az
On the 17, and I am sure the other bombers as well had provisions for installing pulleys and winches to load the racks. On the 17 the bomb hoist was stored on the aft bulkhead of the bombbay, and was clipped onto the racks when in use.

_________________
Matt Gunsch, A&P, IA, Warbird maint and restorations
Jack, You have Debauched my sloth !!!!!!
We tried voting with the Ballot box, When do we start voting from the Ammo box, and am I allowed only one vote ?
Check out the Ercoupe Discussion Group on facebook


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2009 3:51 pm 
Offline
Account Suspended
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:06 pm
Posts: 2713
Let's see em hand crank this puppy!!!!

Image

4400 lbs!

_________________
S.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2009 4:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 10:26 am
Posts: 550
Location: Northants, UK
Image

4000lb'ers in England, July 1943, just to emphasize how big they are. :wink:

_________________
Paul Bellamy

401BG Association Historian & Honorary Life Member
401BG Historical Society (UK) Member
1st Air Division HQ Historical Society (UK) Founder Member
Director of Archives & Collections, Airfield Research Group Archive, Alconbury
RAF Alconbury Base Historian


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2009 4:29 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 3:08 pm
Posts: 4542
Location: chicago
Wow!

Just out of curiosity, what would 1 ginormous bomb do that an equivalent tonnage of smaller bombs could not?

_________________
.
.
Sure, Charles Lindbergh flew the plane... but Tom Rutledge built the engine!

Visit Django Studios online or Facebook!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 21, 2009 8:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 10:26 am
Posts: 550
Location: Northants, UK
The AN-M56 4000lb LC was a Light Case weapon, i.e. the weight of explosive was 3245lbs alone, inside a thin metal casing just strong enough to hold the contents during storage and delivery.

This was the AAF's "Block Buster" bomb, designed as a pure blast weapon to "raze areas equal to a city block or more".

I suppose the direct RAF version was the 4000lb Cookie, also available in 8000lb and 12000lb flavours depending on how many were bolted together.

All the best,
PB

_________________
Paul Bellamy

401BG Association Historian & Honorary Life Member
401BG Historical Society (UK) Member
1st Air Division HQ Historical Society (UK) Founder Member
Director of Archives & Collections, Airfield Research Group Archive, Alconbury
RAF Alconbury Base Historian


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: C VEICH, Google [Bot], Noha307 and 294 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group