Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Fri Jun 27, 2025 11:04 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:03 pm
Posts: 13
Location: Fort Smith, AR
I have noticed that the propeller blades on the F7F fire bombers are squared off while the original and restored 'Cats have rounded tips.

Was this just a newer model of propeller and, if so, why did the contractors go with the square tipped blade model? As noted, the restorations all seem to have gone back to the original style blades.

Thanks to all for any and all information.

Randie Coulter


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 7:48 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 7:28 pm
Posts: 2184
Location: Waukesha, WI
Trust me, I don't know squat but it may be that they are taking an existing prop blade that is longer than required and cutting it down. I have seen this with other applications I once messed with. It was cheaper than to tool for the original version and quite acceptable, performance wise. 8)

Now I'll wait to be flogged for my misinformation. :wink:

_________________
"There are old pilots and bold pilots but few old, bold pilots."


Last edited by sdennison on Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:03 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:03 pm
Posts: 13
Location: Fort Smith, AR
Someone else had suggested that that might be the case.

I know that they changed the propellers out on the F-15 Reporter fire bomber because of performance issues and I was wondering if that might not have been the case with the F7F's as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 10:27 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 08, 2004 2:59 pm
Posts: 1715
Location: Safford, Az
Now I could be totally wrong but there is some truth to the matter.
Cut down props are like cutting the wings down on a racer, gives a little more performance.
Why none now do since most survivers were fire bombers, don't know?
I would say that owners din't like em and were able to find original blades?
I too would like to know a little about this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:03 pm
Posts: 13
Location: Fort Smith, AR
Well, at least I got the pot stirred up a little on this. Gonna sit back and see what happens. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 9:25 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:52 pm
Posts: 1216
Location: Hudson, MA
RCoulter52 wrote:
I have noticed that the propeller blades on the F7F fire bombers are squared off while the original and restored 'Cats have rounded tips.

Was this just a newer model of propeller and, if so, why did the contractors go with the square tipped blade model? As noted, the restorations all seem to have gone back to the original style blades.

Thanks to all for any and all information.

Randie Coulter


I don't know for sure but would think that later versions of the props may have had squared tips. I have a photograph of one of the last C-123s in service and it had one propeller with rounded tips and one with square tips. There was a lot of research done on propellers during and after the war and one of the results is that pre war most props had rounded tips and post war most have squared tips. My guess is that rounded tips did not add to efficiency and squared tips either were more efficient or did not detract and were easier to manufacture.

_________________
"I can't understand it, I cut it twice and it's still too short!" Robert F. Dupre' 1923-2010 Go With God.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:11 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:03 pm
Posts: 13
Location: Fort Smith, AR
Alright. We're getting some interesting takes on this. Let's keep it going until we get a definitive answer. All, so far, seem logical.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:17 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 12:39 pm
Posts: 1817
Location: Irving, Texas
C-130 props have square tips yet the P-3 has round tips with the same engine. I asked a Hamilton Standard prop tech rep and he said the difference is the square tips provide better heavy lift while the round tips are better for cruising.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 1:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 190
Location: Waco, TX
The B-26K-model Invader had different R2800s and square-tip props than the earlier models, wonder if the fire bomber Tcats used that prop and maybe engine combination...? From the same era....


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 5:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:03 pm
Posts: 13
Location: Fort Smith, AR
b29flteng wrote:
C-130 props have square tips yet the P-3 has round tips with the same engine. I asked a Hamilton Standard prop tech rep and he said the difference is the square tips provide better heavy lift while the round tips are better for cruising.

Now we're getting somewhere.

Thank all of you guys for the input. But, don't stop now! It's getting fun and educational!! :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 01, 2009 5:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:03 pm
Posts: 13
Location: Fort Smith, AR
hahnej wrote:
The B-26K-model Invader had different R2800s and square-tip props than the earlier models, wonder if the fire bomber Tcats used that prop and maybe engine combination...? From the same era....

This, too, is a possibility as they were from the same time frame. Something else to ponder.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 12:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:03 pm
Posts: 13
Location: Fort Smith, AR
Just wanna keep this on the front page in case somebody else has a different explanation. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 02, 2009 12:48 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
I was told by an old timey P-3/C-130 F.E. that square tips=power props and round=speed props

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 9:10 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 12:03 pm
Posts: 13
Location: Fort Smith, AR
One more bump and then I'll let her die.

I think we may have the answer, though. The little 'Cats were lifting quite a bit more than when they were at their 'fighting weight' so the the 'square tips=power props and round=speed props' makes sense to me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 03, 2009 4:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 2:24 pm
Posts: 819
Location: San Angelo, Texas
Ref the round tips on the P-3. Interesting to note that the L-188 Super Electra had square tips. One would think an airline would opt for speed props vs power props. And it looks like Aero Union (IIRC) is using speed props on its firefighting P-3s rather than power props.

_________________
Bob


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group