LSFM's newest aircraft! (pics)
Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:54 pm
Im glad to announce that LSFM now has its newest aircraft in the fleet back down on the island! She's fresh out of the paint shop and looking great. The Texan is painted as a tribute to the 111th Fighter Squadron of the Texas Air National Guard. The 111th has served the Houston area since 1917 and our T-6 is painted to resemble their T-6's from the 1950s. She will soon be added to the list of aircraft for flight experiences along with the B-17, B-25 & PT-17.
Visit www.LSFM.org for more information and museum updates!
The pics were taken over Galveston Island & at LSFM.
Visit www.LSFM.org for more information and museum updates!
The pics were taken over Galveston Island & at LSFM.
Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:57 pm
I like it 
Whos at the stick, Larry or Tommy 
Thanks.
Whos at the stick, Larry or Tommy Thanks.
Mon Jan 19, 2009 8:57 pm
Great shots!
Love the paint!
Is that Gumby flying it?
Jerry
Love the paint!
Is that Gumby flying it?
Jerry
Mon Jan 19, 2009 9:01 pm
Mon Jan 19, 2009 10:12 pm
Looked like a Marine in the cockpit!
Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:02 pm
You can see that the hangars are still in the process of being repaired from "Ike" in pics one and two... They dont belong to LSFM but are across the ramp.
Also a Cessna T-41 was donated to LSFM last month. This might be added to the "Flight Experiences" as well! It great to see two new hangar mates!
Also a Cessna T-41 was donated to LSFM last month. This might be added to the "Flight Experiences" as well! It great to see two new hangar mates!
Mon Jan 19, 2009 11:57 pm
T-6Fs didn't have a gun
Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:26 am
Great pictures Trae !
Great to know the plan is to use this airplane for rides
It sure looks pretty
Great to know the plan is to use this airplane for rides
It sure looks pretty
Tue Jan 20, 2009 5:35 am
Stoney wrote:T-6Fs didn't have a gun
And I believe that F's weren't equipped with spinners either.
Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:06 am
She's a beauty! 
Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:39 am
Can't some of you experts ever just enjoy the photos, etc without the "Hey! I want to be the first to point out your errors!" crap that accompanies every thread on WIX ?
Congratulations to LSFM for putting another beauty in the air!
Congratulations to LSFM for putting another beauty in the air!
Tue Jan 20, 2009 8:43 am
Stoney,
AT-6F's and SNJ-6's were built by NAA at Hensley Field in Grand Prairie, TX with provisions for the gun in the right wing, one firing through the prop and a simple reflector gun sight. The AT-6F/SNJ-6 were unique in that the swivel rear seat was deleted, had a fixed rear canopy enclosure and provisions for a flexible gun in back were deleted as well. After they were re-designated T-6F's around 1947, you may be correct that gun provisions were no longer used/needed at that point in their careers.
Skymaster02:
Most if not all AT-6F's and SNJ-6's came from the factory equipped with spinners. Many photos of the production line in Grand Prairie show this.
Yes, I know, I'm turning into an Anorak . . . .
Carl Best
AT-6F's and SNJ-6's were built by NAA at Hensley Field in Grand Prairie, TX with provisions for the gun in the right wing, one firing through the prop and a simple reflector gun sight. The AT-6F/SNJ-6 were unique in that the swivel rear seat was deleted, had a fixed rear canopy enclosure and provisions for a flexible gun in back were deleted as well. After they were re-designated T-6F's around 1947, you may be correct that gun provisions were no longer used/needed at that point in their careers.
Skymaster02:
Most if not all AT-6F's and SNJ-6's came from the factory equipped with spinners. Many photos of the production line in Grand Prairie show this.
Yes, I know, I'm turning into an Anorak . . . .
Carl Best
Tue Jan 20, 2009 6:43 pm
T6pilot wrote:Skymaster02:
Most if not all AT-6F's and SNJ-6's came from the factory equipped with spinners. Many photos of the production line in Grand Prairie show this.
I beg to differ. I have owned a T-6G, and have performed many annual inspections on different versions of the AT/T-6 family, and only the "G" came from the factory equipped with prop spinners. They are not shown in the maintenance/erection manuals or the illustrated parts manuals for any other than the G's.
Many aircraft have them, but they were not original equipment on them.
Now to get to the issue of not accurate. This is owned by a museum, its not a run of the mill warbird. Museum pieces and artifacts should be representative or should be original condition. Don't get me wrong, its a nice airplane, but its no museum piece.
Tue Jan 20, 2009 6:54 pm
Since when did an airplane used for ride experiences become a "museum piece"? It's a living, breathing, flying piece of history just like every other flying warbird. I for one wouldn't want a pristinely restored "museum piece" flying every weekend. I'd want the best maintainable aircraft that looks the part it's supposed to play. There will always have to be some trade-off.
BTW, unless I missed something, the first mention of a T-6F was by Stoney, not by anyone at or associated with LSFM. Everything on their site and what Elroy posted says just "T-6", so where in the world did this argument come from anyway?
BTW, unless I missed something, the first mention of a T-6F was by Stoney, not by anyone at or associated with LSFM. Everything on their site and what Elroy posted says just "T-6", so where in the world did this argument come from anyway?
Tue Jan 20, 2009 7:14 pm
Looks to be an SNJ-5 with a T-6F/SNJ-6 rear canopy if I have the registration correct...
http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry ... rtxt=566TX
http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry ... rtxt=566TX