FIRST
This thread is getting rather ugly.
Let's tone down the rhetoric just a bit.
Second,
I have no desire for Bill to leave this forum. His insight to the Spitfire is invaluable and is some of the best of this forum. Warbirds is what we are about and flying a Spitfire is as much Warbird involvement as one can get.
I did not threaten to can Bill Greenwood.
I have had many conversations with Bill in Private Messages and none of them contained a threat to ban him from the forum.
I have met Bill in person and found him to be a very nice guy.
I disagree with him politically that's all.
I do not have the power to ban anyone.
Scott is the only person to make that call. I have not asked for anyone to be banned.
There are rules in this forum.
Rules of decorum and boundaries to where our conversations can go. these rules were set by the owner of the site.
All of this gnashing of teeth comes from the fact that there are some here that refuse to play by those rules and then get mad when it is pointed out to them. There are wide variations to the interpratations of those rules.
As a moderator I try to be fair and step lightly. I volunteered for the job. I do it for the forum and not for any sort of glory or favor. It's a avocation. I'm not married to the job.
Here is the latest word from Scott. Posted here on December 10, 2008
http://warbirdinformationexchange.org/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=254270#254270
Alright everybody. This type of stuff is really getting old. This forum is about Warbirds, the meaning of which for our purposes includes pretty much any military aircraft. And that's what this forum should remain focused on. However, we are a community of individuals with different tastes and sensibilities and often times those conflict. The moderators and myself strive to maintain a balance but it becomes difficult when people veer off on some non warbird related tangent. For that I created the off-topic section. However, because it doesn't get viewed as much as the more popular sections do it is not used as much and people feel the need to post in the more active sections. This is annoying as well essentially telling me to go F myself, which of course I don't take kindly too.
People who do these sorts of behaviors and then get their threads banned always cry censorship or oppression of freedom of speech when its something they agree with and say its a good call when they disagree with something.
I have my own opinions on a lot of these topics but don't express them here. Why? BECAUSE THIS ISN'T THE PLACE. We should talk about warbirds, and aviation, and aircraft, and military history, and we can even talk about tanks and ships if you want. But if it involves politics, politicians, laws (that don't concern aviation), religion, and any other hot button topics then it will be gone if I see it. This is your only warning. If the mods lock a thread they do so with my authority, they will lock it down and PM with the URL and I will review it. In only one instance have I ever overruled a mod's lock down of a thread.
Let's all get along and respect each other, nobody wants to be the ahole at the party and I don't want to have to be the bouncer.
_________________
Zane Adams
There I was at 20,000 ft, upside down and out of ammunition.
_______________________________________________________________________________
Join us for the Texas Warbird Report on WarbirdRadio.com!
http://www.facebook.com/WarbirdRadioListen at
http://www.warbirdradio.com