Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Sat Aug 23, 2025 11:47 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Not an inch to spare!
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 7:07 pm
Posts: 211
Location: Trafford, Alabama
http://go.fark.com/cgi/fark/go.pl?i=405 ... -Australia.
Fully loaded. Not much runway left. WOW :shock:

_________________
*When you meet a Veteran shake his or her hand and thank them. They earned your freedom*


Last edited by B-25 C on Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:32 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:21 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
A couple of different sources list the MTOGW of an Il-76-TD @ 50000kg. or about 247000 lbs. So unless this guy was hauling pallets of bucking bars, I doubt seriously the 1 million pound claim. The -76 is about the same dimensions overall as the A model C-141's.

747's regularly operate close to, and sometimes over the million lb. mark as does the very much larger An-124. I also doubt the landing gear of the CANDID would support anywhere near that weight given its sort of splayed out trailing arm lower struts.

I agree the guy certainly did use every bit of cement available, but that could have come from reduced power settings for technical reasons or a weak engine.
Just my opinion in the matter-

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2008 7:07 pm
Posts: 211
Location: Trafford, Alabama
The Inspector wrote:
A couple of different sources list the MTOGW of an Il-76-TD @ 50000kg. or about 247000 lbs. So unless this guy was hauling pallets of bucking bars, I doubt seriously the 1 million pound claim. The -76 is about the same dimensions overall as the A model C-141's.

747's regularly operate close to, and sometimes over the million lb. mark as does the very much larger An-124. I also doubt the landing gear of the CANDID would support anywhere near that weight given its sort of splayed out trailing arm lower struts.

I agree the guy certainly did use every bit of cement available, but that could have come from reduced power settings for technical reasons or a weak engine.
Just my opinion in the matter-

Probably not but that's what it said.

_________________
*When you meet a Veteran shake his or her hand and thank them. They earned your freedom*


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 1:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 18, 2005 9:44 am
Posts: 163
it was a hot day might that effect the engines ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: every inch counts
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:36 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 9:24 pm
Posts: 1748
Location: atlanta,georgia
That was so close.I wonder if the crew knew they were going to be that close?

_________________
Hang The Expense


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:48 pm 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 10:01 am
Posts: 1126
Location: Post-Confederate People's Republic of Alabamastan, Suh!
In 1992, two Russian Bear-Hs and an AN-124 visited the US (@ Barksdale AFB), and when they left they flew non-stop back to their base near Moscow. We were at the departure end of the runway and being full of fuel both Bears swayed the trees off the end of runway 15 - 12,000'! I've got a ton of film of the ~week they were at BAD, including mine and the Combat Camera raw footage, including the awesome takeoffs. The sound is exactly like Jimmy Stewart's B-36 - exactly.

Wade

_________________
Website: http://www.wademeyersart.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Wade.Meyers.Studios

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:11 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2007 10:23 pm
Posts: 2348
Location: Atlanta, GA
Is the video real? Sure. Did he really need every foot of runway? Maybe. One explanation is that the pilot accelerated longer on the runway to build up more "smash" and pulled 'er off at the end. Is that possible? Sure.

When pilots fly the same airplane, big or small, day in and day out, the only way they genuinely get in a situation like this is to screw up big time, either with the gross weight of the bird or when computing their takeoff data (including a reduced power selection). Not only does experience tell you what's "doable" before crunching the numbers, but crews experienced with these big birds will also employ techniques such as an acceration time check or measured acceleration distance to ensure the airplane is performing properly long before getting to an abort point - not to mention the departure end. No, his climb-out path is not stellar, but he's not dragging the trees for miles either.

I'm a skeptic at heart. :wink: If it were really a goof (including computing no data at all), I'd've expected to see a much more aggressive rotation, given that the end was rapidly approaching. Also, look at it this way - if the airplane were overloaded, what are the odds that the overload was exactly such that it would lift off exactly at the end? Odds are that it'd lift off earlier ... or go long, but not need the precise length available. To me, it's more plausible that he chose his rotation spot, however gutsy it may have been.

One man's opinion.

Ken
767/757/737/727, DC-9, C-130

_________________
"Take care of the little things and the big things will take care of themselves."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 9:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 3:22 am
Posts: 662
Location: Southern California
the AN-124s operate as independant contractors for the ISAF and bring in and out supplies to Bagram Afghanistan, and darn, they would use every inch of runway and you swear they used a couple of yards of the dirt at the end too to get off the ground. You'd think it wouldnt do it every week, but it sure made it!

_________________
California Air Heritage Foundation
B-25J / C-47B / And the list goes on....
"Never start a fight with 7 men when all your packin' is a 6-Gun! "

Proud Supporter of....American Aeronautical Foundation 501(c)(3)
http://www.aafgroup.org


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 10:36 pm 
Offline
BANNED/ACCOUNT SUSPENDED
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:58 am
Posts: 1054
Location: In Your Screen
Sounds like what the doctor told muddyboots :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jan 08, 2009 11:18 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 6:08 pm
Posts: 2595
Location: Mississippi
---v-O-v---

Next time I'll let YOU dig the foxhole ;)

_________________
"I knew the jig was up when I saw the P-51D-20-NA Mustang blue-nosed bastards from Bodney, and by the way the blue was more of a royal blue than an indigo and the inner landing gear interiors were NOT green, over Berlin."


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 29 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group