Warbird Information Exchange

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed on this site are the responsibility of the poster and do not reflect the views of the management.
It is currently Mon Jun 23, 2025 9:45 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Classic Wings Magazine WWII Naval Aviation Research Pacific Luftwaffe Resource Center
When Hollywood Ruled The Skies - Volumes 1 through 4 by Bruce Oriss


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Brewster F3A Corsairs
PostPosted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:41 pm 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2635
Here's a couple of pics from the Archives.

F3A #04591, Pax River, March 1944. This plane has a venturi like device mounted on the bottom of the wing, just aft of the insignia bar.

F3A #08638 (JS643) Pax River, Nov. 1944. This plane has the venturi mounted on the gear door. Also, no lead edge stall strip and possibly no guns. I figured they are taped over, but no indentations visible.

Note aileron linkage differences between the two.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Regards,
Mike


Last edited by mike furline on Sun Dec 14, 2008 6:24 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:47 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 10:51 pm
Posts: 4669
Location: Cheshire, CT
The British F2A looks like they used an airbrush to take the guns and spoiler out.
Jerry

_________________
"Always remember that, when you enter the ocean or the forest, you are no longer at the top of the food chain."


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 6:50 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Veeeery interesting.

The second aircraft in RN FAA colours looks like the outer wing is much thicker than the standard wing - also the tip, which was clipped on RN Corsairs to get into the RN carrier hangar decks, looks different to that kind, I think.

Here's a deductive guess - a new airfoil wing to improve the low-speed (approach) handling and fit British carriers? (Like most non-Sherlockian deductions, it's probably wrong.)

Thanks for that, I await the solution...

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 8:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 11:52 am
Posts: 775
Location: Arizona
[quote="JDK"]Veeeery interesting.

The second aircraft in RN FAA colours looks like the outer wing is much thicker than the standard wing - also the tip, which was clipped on RN Corsairs to get into the RN carrier hangar decks, looks different to that kind, I think.
[quote]

At first glance it looks like a flying model of a Corsair. They often use a much fatter airfoil out at the tip to make them less prone to tip stall. Plus, most R/C models have an external aileron linkage very much like that of the photo. Not sure what they were attempting but those are definitely some non-standard outer wing panels, and ugly!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 8:39 pm 
Offline
3000+ Post Club
3000+ Post Club
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 27, 2006 2:10 pm
Posts: 3246
Location: New York
James, I agree, and also think the wing might be less tapered, i.e. more nearly constant in chord from wingfold to tip. That would go hand-in-hand with the thickness since thickness must be proportional to chord if the airfoil is the same. Maybe an attempt to make up the wing area lost in the clipping by increasing the chord.

August


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 8:45 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 5:42 pm
Posts: 6884
Location: The Goldfields, Victoria, Australia
Yes, the more you look at that wing, the worse it gets! :lol:

That little sharp 'lump' on the leading edge is similar to the item on the Chipmunk l/e inner, where it causes the wing to stall there first, IIRC, to improve the stall or stall warning. Someone better informed can clarify, I hope.

_________________
James K

"Switch on the underwater landing lights"
Emilio Largo, Thunderball.

www.VintageAeroWriter.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: ???
PostPosted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 11:39 pm 
Offline
Co-MVP - 2006
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 11471
Location: Salem, Oregon
Quote:
That little sharp 'lump' on the leading edge is similar to the item on the Chipmunk l/e inner, where it causes the wing to stall there first, IIRC, to improve the stall or stall warning. Someone better informed can clarify, I hope.

It's a stall strip. This mod was added to the F4U so the wings would stall at the same time elimating the vicious wing drop.

_________________
Don't touch my junk!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:27 am 
Offline
1000+ Posts!
1000+ Posts!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 5:27 am
Posts: 1531
Location: Serbia
Very informative!!! Thank you Mike very much for this reference topic!

Cheers :razz:

_________________
Owner: http://www.letletlet-warplanes.com
Owner: http://www.letletlet-warplanes.com/forum
Owner: http://www.sreckobradic.com
Email: srecko.warplane@gmail.com
Skype: sreckobradic
Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/LetLetLet ... 8234397758


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 2:57 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 12:36 am
Posts: 7961
Location: Mt. Vernon, WA.
The British mod appears to be a grafted on cuff attached @ what looks like the front spar on the existing wing and the cuff built up of false ribs and perhaps plywood as a 'quickie' mod to see if handling was better or worse, my bet is much worse which is why we don't see it on production types it probably handled like a steam shovel and was most likely markedly slower and clumsier with the ' big CUB' wing-perhaps a MoD or FAA requested experiment?
Also note that the venturi has been relocated to the R/H mains outer door instead of the outer lower surface panel. :)

_________________
Don't make me go get my flying monkeys-


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Dec 15, 2008 2:02 pm 
Offline
Been here a long time
Been here a long time

Joined: Sun May 02, 2004 1:16 am
Posts: 11324
Maybe they installed a drooped leading edge for a lower stall speed?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 5:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 1:39 pm
Posts: 58
Location: Somerset,UK
Can you confirm the serial number for the FAA Corsair please. Records I have say's that 'JS643' was in UK during Nov'44! Unless pics were taken in the UK of course!!
Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 7:06 am 
Offline
2000+ Post Club
2000+ Post Club

Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:45 pm
Posts: 2635
merlin101 wrote:
Can you confirm the serial number for the FAA Corsair please. Records I have say's that 'JS643' was in UK during Nov'44! Unless pics were taken in the UK of course!!
Dave


Best I can do,

Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 4:10 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2004 1:39 pm
Posts: 58
Location: Somerset,UK
OK thanks, any more British FAA Corsairs photo's?
Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 46 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group